What this is
- This research investigates the role of matrix metalloproteinases () in tumor immune responses and their potential as therapeutic targets.
- The specific focus is on the MMP2/9 inhibitor SB-3CT and its effects on expression and T cell activity.
- Findings suggest that SB-3CT enhances anti-tumor immunity and improves the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapies.
Essence
- SB-3CT, an MMP2/9 inhibitor, reduces levels in cancer cells, enhancing T cell-mediated tumor killing and improving survival in mouse models. This study proposes a novel combination therapy strategy using SB-3CT with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Key takeaways
- Inhibition of MMP2/9 by SB-3CT significantly reduces tumor burden and enhances survival in mouse models of melanoma and lung cancer.
- SB-3CT treatment decreases mRNA and protein levels in cancer cells, suggesting a mechanism for improved anti-tumor immunity.
- Combining SB-3CT with anti-CTLA-4 therapy results in greater tumor growth inhibition and extended survival compared to either treatment alone.
Caveats
- The study is preclinical, relying on mouse models, which may not fully replicate human responses to therapy.
- Further research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential side effects of SB-3CT in clinical settings.
Definitions
- MMPs: Matrix metalloproteinases, a family of enzymes involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix components.
- PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1, a protein that inhibits T cell activation and is a target for cancer immunotherapy.
AI simplified
Background
Emerging immunotherapies that use immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) [1] have been approved to fight multiple cancers, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and bladder cancer. ICB therapies that target cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [2], programmed death 1 (PD-1) [3], and its ligand programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) [4] have shown promising clinical effects. However, only a small proportion of patients can benefit from anti-CTLA4 and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Recent studies have demonstrated the power of ICB in combination with other treatment strategies to improve treatment efficacy. For example, a combination of CPI-1205, which pharmacologically inhibits EZH2, plus ipilimumab increases the effectiveness of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in a mouse model [5]. In patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, the combination of ipilimumab and sargramostim results in longer overall survival time and lower toxicity compared to treatment with ipilimumab alone [6]. Developing an efficient combinational approach necessitates a better understanding of the underlying mechanism for these synergistic effects. For example, epigenetic modifiers (e.g., BRD4, MLL1), noncoding RNAs (e.g., miR-200, miR570, LINK-A), signaling pathways (e.g., IFNγ-JAK-STAT, NF-κB, HIF-1α, EGFR, Hippo signaling pathway), and post-translational modification (GSK3β, CSN5) are involved in PD-1/PD-L1 pathways [7, 8].
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases [9]. There are 24 known MMPs in humans with several distinct domains, including gelatinases, collagenases, matrilysins, stromelysins, and membrane-type MMPs [10]. MMPs mediate a range of biological functions, such as degradation of various molecules for cell adhesion and modulation of cellular and extracellular matrix interactions [11]. Recent studies have shown that MMPs are highly associated with the microenvironment of tumors and immune cells and that targeting MMPs may overcome the barrier of immune suppression [11, 12]. For example, MMPs process CCL/MCP and CXCL chemokines and their receptors to modulate inflammatory and immune responses [13]. MMP9 is a component of the angiogenic switch during carcinogenesis [14], and MMP9-cleaved osteopontin fragments contribute to tumor immune escape by inducing the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [15]. Clinical trials have pharmacologically targeted MMPs, and multiple broad-spectrum MMP inhibitors, such as batimastat, CGS 27023A, marimastat, prinomastat, tanomastat, and periostat [16], have been developed to target the synthesis, secretion, and activation of MMPs. Among these, marimastat, which was seen as the most promising, was evaluated in phase III trials for patients with breast cancer, lung cancer, and gastric cancer [17–19]. MMP inhibitors have failed to improve the overall survival times of patients or to alleviate symptomatic progression of cancer in clinical trials, mainly due to the non-specificity of the drug and the complex complicated background for specific effects of MMPs [20]. There is a need to understand the impact of MMPs in carcinogenesis in order to optimize the effects of MMP inhibitors in cancer therapy. In addition, the cross-talk between MMP inhibitors and ICB treatment remains unknown. In the present study, we systematically explored the genomic alterations of MMPs across 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [21]. We further characterized the efficacy of one MMP inhibitor, SB-3CT, in combination with anti-PD-1 and/or anti-CTLA4 in vitro and in vivo. Our research provides further understanding of MMPs involved in immunotherapy.
Methods
Data collection and processing
Normalized gene expression data based on the expectation maximization of 33 cancer types was downloaded from the TCGA data portal (http://gdac.broadinstitute.org/↗) [22]. Other independent expression datasets for patients with different cancer types were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/↗), including lung cancer (GSE33072↗ [23], GSE42127↗ [24]) and head and neck cancer (GSE65858↗ [25]). The gene expression data for liver cancer (LICA, LIRI) were downloaded from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (https://icgc.org/icgc/↗). The percentages of TILs were obtained from Thorsson et al. [26] (https://gdc.cancer.gov/about-data/publications/panimmune↗).
The gene list of MMPs was obtained from https://www.genenames.org/↗. MMP family members were divided into seven groups based on their typical structure [10]. The gene signature of the immune cell populations was obtained from Charoentong et al. [27]. Fifty hallmark gene sets were downloaded from The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB, http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/↗) [28]. We used GSVA [29] to calculate the score of each MMP group, immune cell populations, and MSigDB hallmark pathways. MMP groups were considered to show differential expression between tumor and normal paired tissue samples if the GSVA score difference > 0.3 and the two-sided paired Student’s t test p < 0.05. We calculated Spearman’s correlation between the expression of immune features and the score of MMP groups, considering |Rs| > 0.2 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 for statistical significance.
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition gene signatures were obtained from Mak et al. [30], including 25 epithelial marker genes and 52 mesenchymal marker genes. The EMT score for each sample was estimated as \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\sum}_i^N{M}^i/N-{\sum}_j^n{E}^j/n $$\end{document}∑iNMi/N−∑jnEj/n, as described in a previous study [30], where M and E represent the expression of the mesenchymal gene and epithelial gene, respectively, and N and n respectively represent the number of mesenchymal genes and epithelial genes.
Cell culture and transfections
The human malignant melanoma cell lines (A375 and SK-MEL-28) and mouse LLC cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (BI), 100 U of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco). The human A549 lung cancer and mouse melanoma cell line B16F10 was cultured in RPMI1640 medium. All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination and found to be negative. SB-3CT was added to the complete medium at the indicated concentrations and time.
Plasmids and vectors
For the stable infection cell lines, MMP2 and MMP9 shRNA lentiviral vectors carrying hairpins were purchased from Shanghai GemmaPharma. The targeting sequences were described as follows:
shMMP2 #1:AAGAACCAGATCACATACAGG;
shMMP2 #2: AACGGACAAAGAGTTGGCAGT;
shMMP9 #1: AACATCACCTATTGGATCCAA;
shMMP9 #2: AGTACTGGCGATTCTCTGAGGC.
MMP2 and MMP9 overexpression plasmids were synthesized by Shanghai Genechem.
Antibodies and chemicals
Human anti-PD-L1-Rb (ab213524) and mouse anti-PD-L1-Rb (ab213480) were purchased from Abcam; anti-CD8α-Rb (GB11068 and GB11068-1) was purchased from Servicebio; anti-PD-1-Rb (84651) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology; the antibodies specific for human anti-MMP2-Rb (10375-2-AP), anti-MMP9-Rb (10373-2-AP), anti-MMP9-Rb (10373-2-AP), anti-GAPDH-M (60004-1-Ig), and anti-PD-L1-M (66248) were purchased from Proteintech; SB-3CT was purchased from Selleck(S7430); and in vivo mAb anti-PD-1-M (BE0146), anti-CTLA-4-M (BE0164), and IgG isotype control (BE0086, BE0089) were purchased from Bioxcell.
T cell–mediated tumor cell killing assay
To acquire activated T cells, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (LTS1077, Yanjin Biological) were cultured in CTSTM AIIM VTM SFM (A3021002; Gibco) with ImmunoCult Human CD3/CD28/CD2 T cell activator (10,970; STEMCELL Technologies) and IL-2 (1000 U/mL; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 1 week according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The experiments were performed with anti-CD3 antibody (100 ng/mL; 16-0037; eBioscience, Thermo Scientific), IL-2 (1000 U/mL). Cancer cells were allowed to adhere to the plates overnight and then incubated for 48 h with activated T cells in the presence or absence of SB-3CT (25 μM). The ratios between cancer cells and activated cells (1:3) were modified according to the purpose of each experiment. T cells and cell debris were removed by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) wash, and living cancer cells were then quantified by a spectrometer at OD (570 nm) followed by crystal violet staining.
Flow cytometry analysis
In this study, all flow cytometry antibodies and agents were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). In the mouse samples, single-cell suspension of B16f10-xenograft tumor was obtained by rapid and gentle stripping, physical grinding, and filter filtration. After blocking with CD16/CD32 (40477) antibody and removing dead cells with Zombie Red Fixable Viability Kit (77475), cells were stained using APCCY7-CD45(103116), AF700-CD3(100216), PECY5.5-CD4(100434), PECY7-CD8(100722), APC-CD25(102012), and BV421-PD1(135218) for 20 min. After fixation and permeabilization (421402), intracellular antibody was stained using PE-FOXp3(126404), FITC-GZMB (372206), and BV711-IFNγ(505836). To detect the expression of PD-L1 on the membrane of human cell lines, cells were stained using PE-PDL1 (329706), after blocking with Human TruStain FcX(422302) antibody and removing dead cells with Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Kit (423102). Stained cells were analyzed by FACS Dxp AthenaTM (Cytek, Fremont, CA, USA). Data were further analyzed by Flow Jo 10.0 software.
Immunoblot analyses
Cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (DingGuo, China) supplemented with protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA). Protein concentrations were measured using a Beckman Coulter DU-800 spectrophotometer using the BCA reagent (Beyotime, China). Equal amounts of protein were resolved by SDS–PAGE and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. The blots were detected using a gel image analysis system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Immunofluorescence
For multiple immunofluorescence, human tissue chip and 4-μm paraffin sections were baked for 120 min at 60 °C and then deparaffinized. Antigen was retrieved at EDTA antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.0) and maintained at a sub-boiling temperature for 8 min, then left standing for 8 min and followed by maintaining at sub-boiling temperature again for 7 min. After spontaneous fluorescence quenching, samples were blocked in 3% BSA, PBS wash with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies targeting PD-1, CD8α, or PD-1 were incubated overnight at 4 °C in the blocking solution and then the following day were held at room temperature for 30 min. After extensive washing in PBS-0.25% Triton X-100, the secondary antibody was added to the blocking solution and incubated for 2 h if needed. Each primary antibody was dyed separately, and between intervals of each staining, the antigen was repaired once again in the EDTA antigen retrieval buffer (pH 8.0) by a microwave oven. After extensive washing in PBS-0.25% Triton X-100, slides were given a coverslip of anti-fade mounting medium. Then, the slides were incubated with DAPI solution at room temperature for 10 min and kept in a dark place. Microscopy detection was performed and images were collected by fluorescent microscopy.
Real-time RT-PCR analyses
Total RNAs were extracted using trizol (Bioteke Corporation, China), and reverse transcription reactions were performed using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 40 cycles of quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were conducted in 96-well plates using SYBR Green qPCR mixture (CWBIO, China) on the QuantStudio3 Real-Time PCR System. The fold change of gene expression was calculated by 2– (ΔCtexperimental group–ΔCtcontrol group). The sequence of primers was as follows:
Human GAPDH: forward, 5′-GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT-3′; reverse, 5′-GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG-3′.
Mouse GAPDH: forward, 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′; reverse, 5′-GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA-3′.
Human PD-L1 (also known as CD274): forward, 5-TGGCATTTGCTGAACGCATTT-3′; reverse, 5′-TGCAGCCAGGTCTAATTGTTTT-3′.
Mouse PD-L1 (also known as Cd274): forward, 5′-GCTCCAAAGGACTTGTACGTG-3′; reverse, 5′-TGATCTGAAGGGCAGCATTTC-3′.
Human MMP9: forward, 5′-TGTACCGCTATGGTTACACTCG-3′; reverse, 5′-GGCAGGGACAGTTGCTTCT-3′.
Human MMP2: forward, 5′-TACAGGATCATTGGCTACACACC-3′; reverse, 5′-GGTCACATCGCTCCAGACT-3′.
Mouse tumor generation and implantation
The animal protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital (Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China). All experiments strictly followed the guidelines for the investigation of experimental pain in conscious animals for minimizing animals’ suffering and improving animals’ welfare. Wild-type B16F10 (5 × 105) or LLC cells (1 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into specific-pathogen-free-grade 6-week-old C57BL/6 female mice (from the Shanghai SLAC). Nearly 1 week later, the mice were pooled and randomly divided into several groups. When establishing the lung metastatic xenograft model, the mice in each group received 100-μl cell suspension (including 5 × 105 B16F10 cells) via intravenous injection and were administered treatment on day 3. Mice were treated daily with SB-3CT (10 mg/kg, i.p.), anti-mouse PD-1 mAb (100 μg/mouse/3 days) or anti-mouse CTLA-4 mAb (200 μg/mouse/3 days), combination therapy or control vehicle/isotype only, for 9–15 days. Subsequently, tumors were collected and analyzed by FACS. The excised xenografts were also snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were prepared for further analysis at the same time.
RNA-seq analysis
RNA-seq was performed by Illumina Hiseq x-ten with 150-base paired-end reads. All reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10 or hg19) using hisat2 [31] with the default setting. Stringtie [32] was used to calculate the transcriptional expression level as fragments per kilobase per million. Genes were considered to be differentially expressed if the |log2(fold change)| > 0.5 and two-sided Student’s t test p < 0.5.
Survival analysis
Overall survival analyses were performed using the R package survival, and the subjects were dichotomized based on median expression (enrichment score) or divided in two or more groups by specified parameters. Kaplan–Meier estimation of survival was used to construct the survival curves. Log-rank tests (corresponding to a two-sided Z test) were used to compare overall survival between subjects in different groups, and the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) was provided for comparison of two groups. The p values were adjusted for multiple testing based on the FDR according to the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Statistical analysis
Experimental data were expressed as mean ± s.d. One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test were used to determine the statistical differences between multiple groups, and two-sided Student’s t test was used in two groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with the analysis and mapping by Graphpad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., version 7.0).
Results
Dysregulation of MMP family and association with cancer hallmarks
To determine the functional effects of group4 dysregulation in human cancer, we analyzed the correlation between the group4 GSVA score and 50 cancer hallmark gene sets, which represent well-defined biological processes in human cancers [28]. We found that the group4 score highly correlated with multiple cancer hallmarks, including angiogenesis, apoptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and inflammatory response (Additional file 1: Fig. S1C). Interestingly, this score significantly correlated with many cancer hallmarks associated with immune response, including TNF-α signaling via NF-κB, IL2, and STAT5 signaling; IL6, JAK, and STAT3 signaling; inflammatory responses; IFNα response; and IFNγ response (Additional file 1: Fig. S1C). Therefore, we further explored the association of MMP2/9 with the tumor–immune environment. We observed that MMP2/9 highly correlated with tumor infiltration lymphocytes (TILs) across 27 cancer types (median Spearman’s correlation coefficient [Rs] = 0.43; Fig. 1c). Furthermore, MMP2/9 correlated with regulatory T cells (Tregs) [34, 35] across 30 cancer types (median Rs = 0.57; Fig. 1d). In addition, MMP2/9 positively correlated with most inhibitory immune checkpoints across multiple cancer types (Fig. 1e). For example, MMP2/9 highly correlated with exhausted T cell marker PDCD1 across 23 cancer types. These results suggested that MMP2/9 may contribute to tumor immune escape.
To further investigate the functional role of MMP2/9 in the immune response, we performed an in vitro T cell cytotoxicity-mediated tumor killing assay based on SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of SB-3CT, which is known to inhibit gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) with high selectivity [36, 37]. Inhibition of MMP2/9 significantly increased the CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity and ability to eliminate tumor cells (Fig. 1f, g), and the CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity and killing ability was significantly stronger with IFNγ induction, which induced PD-L1 surface expression [38]. Taken together, our T cell tumor killing assay suggested that SB-3CT, an MMP2/9 inhibitor, can activate co-cultured T cell activity.
Dysregulation of MMPs and associations with cancer hallmarks.Seven MMP groups based on their typical structures.Differential score of MMP groups across 14 cancer types (-axis) compared to paired normal samples (fold change > 1.5; paired two-sided Student’stest< 0.05). Pie chart in the right panel shows the percentage of cancer types with significant upregulation (red), downregulation (blue), and non-significant alteration (gray).,MMP2/9 score correlated withT cell–tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) andregulatory T cells (Tregs). Pie charts show the percentage of cancer types with positive (red) and non-significant (gray) correlation.Spearman’s correlation of MMP groups and inhibitory immune checkpoints.,T cell–mediated cancer cell killing assay.SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells co-cultured with activated T cells for 48 h with or without SB-3CT (12.5, 25 μM) or IFNγ (200 ng/mL) were subjected to crystal violet staining. SK-MEL-28-to-T cell ratio, 1:3.Statistical analysis. Results are mean ± s.d. NS,> 0.05, *< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test a b c d c d e f g f g Y t p p p p p
SB-3CT, the MMP2/9 inhibitor, enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 blockade
Synergistic therapeutic effect of combination treatments with MMP2/9 inhibitor, SB-3CT, and anti-PD-1. Images ofB16F10 tumor andLLC tumor, collected from the combination strategies (control: isotype; PD1 inhibition: anti-PD1; MMP2/9 inhibition: SB-3CT; combination treatment: anti-PD-1+SB-3CT). The B16F10 tumor was captured at the ninth days, and the LLC tumor was captured at the fifth days after treatment. Tumor volumes ofB16F10 andLLC tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis ofB16F10 orLLC tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy. Body weight ofB16F10 andLLC tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy. Sample size per group in one experiment is 5. Error bars represent s.d. of individual mice per group in one experiment. NS,> 0.05, *< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by,two-way ANOVA,,two-sided log-rank test, and,one-way ANOVA a b c d e f g h c d e f g h p p p p
Enhanced activation of lymphocytes and reduced expression of PD-L1 with SB-3CT treatment
Immune features in tumors for B16F10 xenograft mouse model with SB-3CT treatment.Fluorescence expression andquantification of CD8T cells.Heatmap of-score normalized percentage of immune cell populations (–) in TILs for B16F10 tumor-bearing mice treated with anti-PD-1 and SB-3CT in combination or alone.–In the implanted B16F10 tumors from mice treated with or without SB-3CT and PD-1 blockade, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used to measureCD8in CD3T cells,CD8IFNγin CD8T cells,CD8GZMBin CD8T cells,Gr-1CD11bMDSCs in CD45cells, andCD25FOXP3Treg in CD4cells.Fluorescence expression andquantification of PD-L1 in B16F10 tumor-bearing wild-type C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy. Sample size is 5 in each cohort. Scale bars, 50 μm. Results are mean ± s.d. ns,> 0.05,*< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test a b c d h d h d e f g h i j + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Z p p p p
SB-3CT modulates PD-L1-related pathways through diminishing PD-L1
To further understand the regulation of the MMP2/9 inhibitor, SB-3CT, on PD-L1 expression, we performed RNA-seq to identify the signaling pathways altered by SB-3CT in A375 cells. We found 323 significantly upregulated genes and 1870 downregulated genes upon treatment with SB-3CT (Fig. 5n). In particular, the downregulated genes were significantly enriched in oncogenic pathways, including PI3K-Akt, AMPK, Hippo, HIF-1, and mTOR signaling pathways (Fig. 5o), which have been reported as activating the expression of PD-L1 [7]. Taken together, our results suggested a potential mechanism in that SB-3CT decreases multiple oncogenic pathways, including the PI3K-AKT pathway, to decrease the expression level of PD-L1.
Downregulation of MMP2/9 by SB-3CT treatment reduced PD-L1 expression.Spearman’s correlation of group4 score and PD-L1 mRNA expression across 33 cancer types.–Evaluation of PD-L1 expression derived from SK-MEL-28 melanoma cell lines and A549 lung cancer cell lines treated with DMSO, SB-3CT (25 μM), IFNγ (200 ng/mL), and IFNγ/SB-3CT in combination for 24 h.,PD-L1 expression by RT-PCR inSK-MEL-28 melanoma cell lines andA549 lung cancer cell lines.,Western blot (left panel: representative images, right panel: quantification) of PD-L1 protein levels inSK-MEL-28 andA549.,Flow cytometry of PD-L1membrane level inSK-MEL-28 andA549.–PD-L1 expression of SK-MEL-28 melanoma cell line transfected with shMMP2 (–) and shMMP9 (–) or the scrambled negative control shRNA (shNC). Western blot (,) quantification of MMP2, MMP9, and PD-L1 protein expression (,), and RT-PCR analysis of MMP2, MMP9, and PD-L1 mRNA expression (,) a b g b c b c d e d e f g f g h m h j k m h k i l j m +
Regulation of PD-L1 expression through MMP2/9 has an anti-tumor effect.–Analysis of PD-L1 expression of SK-MEL-28 melanoma cell line with overexpression (oe) MMP2 (–), oeMMP9 (–). Western blot (,), quantification (,), and RT-PCR analysis (,) of MMP2, MMP9, and PD-L1 protein or mRNA expression.–PD-L1 expression of shMMP2 (–) and shMMP9 (–) SK-MEL-28 melanoma cell line treated with SB-3CT. Western blot (,); quantification of MMP2, MMP9, and PD-L1 protein (,); and mRNA expression (,).Western blot showed the protein expression of PD-L1 for SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells with overexpression of PD-L1, treated with or without SB-3CT.-scale normalization expression of differentially expressed genes (fold change > 1.5 and two-sided Student’stest< 0.05) between A375 melanoma cell lines treated with IFNγ/SB-3CT in combination and IFNγ.Enriched signaling pathways for genes downregulated in A375 melanoma cell lines treated with SB-3CT and IFNγ in combination (Fisher’s exact test< 0.05). All experiments were repeated three times independently. Results are mean ± s.d. NS,> 0.05, *< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test a f a c d f a d b e c f g l g i j l g j h k i l m n o Z t p p p p p p
Combination of SB-3CT and anti-CTLA-4 improves anti-tumor immune response
A recent study demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 in combination with anti-CTLA4 [39]. Since we identified that SB-3CT can reduce PD-L1 expression, we hypothesized that the combination of SB-3CT and anti-CTLA-4 will also achieve therapeutic efficacy. We assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the MMP2/9 inhibitor SB-3CT in combination with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody in two tumor models, B16F10 melanoma (Fig. 6a, Additional file 1: Fig. S6A) and LLC (Fig. 6b, Additional file 1: Fig. S6B). In the B16F10 melanoma model, SB-3CT alone significantly decreased tumor growth at day 9 post-treatment compared to the control group (mean tumor size 1482 vs 2570 mm3; p < 0.01), while a combination treatment of SB-3CT and anti-CTLA-4 reached better efficacy (mean tumor size310 vs 2570 mm3; p < 0.001; Fig. 6a and Additional file 1: Fig. S6C). SB-3CT alone substantially extended the overall survival time (median survival37 vs 22 days; p < 0.01) of B16F10 tumor-bearing mice, and combined with anti-CTLA-4, enhanced the survival benefit (median survival time: 58 vs 22 days; p < 0.001; Fig. 6c). The LLC model showed similar results in that mice given the SB-3CT treatment had inhibited tumor growth (1402 vs 2593 mm3; p < 0.001; Fig. 6b and Additional file 1: Fig. S6D) and extended survival time (31 vs 23 days; p < 0.01; Fig. 6d), while the combination treatment enhanced the decrease in tumor growth (392 vs 2593 mm3; p < 0.001; Fig. 6b and Additional file 1: Fig. S6D) and extended survival (62 vs 23 days; p < 0.01; Fig. 6d). Administration of SB-3CT or in combination with CTLA-4 blockade exhibited minimal effects on the body weight of the mice (Additional file 1: Fig. S6E-F), which further confirmed the limited toxicity associated with SB-3CT treatment in tumor-bearing mice.
We further delineated the effects of SB-3CT and anti-CTLA-4 treatment in combination or alone on the tumor–immune microenvironment. Immunofluorescent staining showed that the PD-L1 protein was significantly reduced in SB-3CT-treated mice compared with the control group, and combination therapy enhanced this decrease (Fig. 6e, f). The combination treatment substantially reduced PD-L1 expression and increased the activated tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cell population in the tumor (Fig. 6g, h). Further FACS analysis revealed the functional activity of CD8+ TILs in tumors treated with the combination treatment (Fig. 6i, Additional file 1: Fig. S7, and Fig. S8). The combination treatment significantly increased the infiltration percentage of CD3+ T cells in CD45+ cells (from 23.6 to 52.0%; p < 0.01)(Additional file 1: Fig. S7A and C) and the infiltration percentage of CD8+ T cells in CD3+ T cells (from 40.4 to 69.7%; p < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Fig. S7B and D). We further assessed the functional consequences of SB-3CT and anti-CTLA-4 in combination in TILs and found that the combination treatment significantly enhanced the infiltration of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells (from 27.1 to 51.8%; p < 0.001; Additional file 1: Fig. S8A and D) and IFNγ+CD8+ T cells (from 7.43 to 64.0%, p < 0.001; Additional file 1: Fig. S8B and E). Meanwhile, the combination treatment substantially reduced the infiltration percentage of CD25+FOXP3+Treg cells in CD4+ T cells (from 10.6 to 2.25%; p < 0.001; Additional file 1: Fig. S8C and F). This suggested that combining the MMP2/9 inhibitor SB-3CT with anti-CTLA-4 can promote active lymphocytes and reduce suppressed immune cells and PD-L1 to enhance therapeutic efficacy.
SB-3CT improved therapeutic efficacy of ICB therapy in lung metastasis models of melanoma
Synergistic therapeutic effect of SB-3CT treatment combined with CTLA-4 blockade. Tumor volumes ofB16F10 orLLC tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-CTLA-4, or combination strategy. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis ofB16F10 orLLC tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-CTLA-4, or combination strategy.–Immune features in B16F10 tumor-bearing C57/BL6 mice treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-CTLA-4, or combination strategy.Fluorescence expression andquantification of PD-L1 expression in tumor.Fluorescence expression andquantification of PD1CD8T cells in tumor.Heatmap represents-score normalized percentage of immune cell populations. Sample size per group in one experiment is 5. Error bars represent s.d. of individual mice per group in one experiment. NS,> 0.05, *< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by,two-way ANOVA,,two-sided log-rank test, and,one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test a b c d e i e f g h i a b c d f h + + Z p p p p
SB-3CT significantly reduces melanoma lung metastasis in combination with checkpoint inhibition.Spearman’s correlation between MMP2/9 score and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) score.Heatmap shows the relative expression of mesenchymal genes differentially expressed between B16F10 tumor with vehicle (= 4) and SB-3CT treatment (= 4).EMT score between SB-3CT treatment and vehicle group.value is determined by two-sided Student’stest.Representative images andquantification of lung metastasis in wild-type C57/BL6 mice with B16F10 cells intravenously treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy.Kaplan–Meier survival curve for mice over time.Representative images andquantification of lung metastasis in wild-type C57/BL6 mice with B16F10 cells intravenously treated with isotype, SB-3CT, anti-PD-1, or combination strategy.Kaplan–Meier survival curve for mice over time. Sample size per group in one experiment is 5. Error bars represent s.d. of individual mice per group in one experiment. NS,> 0.05, *< 0.05, **< 0.01, and ***< 0.001, as determined by,two-way ANOVA,,two-sided log-rank test, and,one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test a b c d e f g h i b c f i e h n n p t p p p p
Discussion
Therapies for treating cancer by utilizing the human immune system have shown substantial clinical benefits. However, the overall response rate to PD-1/PD-L1 blockers has been relatively low, so it is necessary to further improve ICB therapy by combining it with other treatment strategies. MMPs are the most prominent family of proteinases associated with tumorigenesis. There are increasing studies that reported the associations between MMP family and cancer immunotherapy. For example, Juric et al. reported that anti-MMP-9 treatment can increase the expression of CXCL10 and other T cell-related stimulatory factors, including IL-12p70 and IL18 [47]. However, the association of MMPs and immune checkpoint blockade therapy, particularly, whether it is involved in the regulation of PD-L1, remains unclear. Herein, we systematically explored the dysregulation of MMPs in human cancers and demonstrated that MMP2/9 highly correlates with TILs. MMP2/9 is also associated with T cell exhaustion and inhibitory immune checkpoints. We further demonstrated that SB-3CT, an MMP2/9 inhibitor, significantly enhances T cell–mediated cytotoxicity. Our results showed that MMP2/9-specific inhibitor SB-3CT significantly decreased PD-L1 mRNA and protein levels in melanoma cell lines and significantly reduced the PD-L1 protein level in PD-L1 overexpression cell line. Based on our results and previous literatures, we speculate that MMP inhibition may decrease PD-L1 expression by inactivating TGF-β. It was reported that MMPs (MT1-MMP, MMP2, and MMP9) can activate TGF-β via proteolytic cleavage of latent transforming growth factor-β binding protein (LTBP) and the latency-associated peptide (LAP) [48–50]. Additionally, Tumor growth factor beta (TGF-β) can significantly elevate the PD-L1 expression by inducing EMT [51, 52]. Therefore, we hypothesize that MMP inhibition may inactivate TGF-β, leading to the PD-L1 downregulation. Our previous study and many recent studies have shown that the tumor PD-L1 expression level affects tumor immunity by control of cytotoxic T cell activity [53–58]. Therefore, our results suggested that tumor PD-L1 may contribute to SB-3CT-mediated anti-tumor effect. It is necessary to perform experiments in in vitro and in vivo assays with deficient PD-L1 to test if SB-3CT requires PD-L1 for its efficacy.
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov and previous literatures, several MMP inhibitors were synthesized and trialed [18–20, 59]. Unfortunately, several clinical trials of MMP inhibitors are failed at different phases, mainly due to the non-specificity of the drug and the complicated background for specific effects of MMPs. The development of MMP inhibitors is largely paused due to these failures. New clinical trials of MMP inhibitors have been started in cancers to improve the therapeutic efficacy through combination treatment with other therapies or compounds. For example, MMP9 neutralizing antibody (andecaliximab) and anti-PD1 (nivolumab) was combined to treat gastric and esophageal cancers in the phase II clinical trial NCT02864381↗ [60], suggesting the potential re-application of MMP inhibitors in cancer therapy. Our in vivo studies showed that SB-3CT, an MMP2/9 inhibitor, could improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 treatment in mouse models with melanoma and lung cancer, as well as metastatic melanoma in the lung. Through our computational analysis and in vitro assays, we revealed a potential mechanism in that MMP2/9 modulates the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells. As a small molecule, SB-3CT is much cheaper to use than anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4 antibodies [61]. More importantly, SB-3CT targets MMP2/9 in the tumor microenvironment rather target immune response directly, which is how antibodies function, and it may cause less toxicity or immune-related adverse events, thus making SB-3CT a potential reagent for future immunotherapy [62–64]. Further studies are necessary to examine the potential toxicity of SB-3CT or its associated immune-related adverse events.
Our work provides a novel paradigm for reducing the workload for identifying potential reagents for immunotherapy through integrative analysis as well as in vitro assays. We subdivided MMPs based on the structure of functional domains and their substrate specificities as the previous study suggested, including signal peptide domain, propeptide domain, catalytic domain, and haemopexin-like domain [10]. This is a widely accepted classification, which is used in many other studies [10, 65–67]. It is possible to subdivide MMPs based on different criteria, which may lead to the discoveries of other MMP inhibitors that may play significant roles in clinical practice.
Conclusions
MMP2/9 is significantly dysregulated in human cancers and is associated with poor prognosis and detrimental immune features. The inhibition of MMP2/9 by SB-3CT significantly reduced the tumor burden and improved survival time via the promotion of anti-tumor immunity, potentially through reducing PD-L1 expression. SB-3CT treatment enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade in the treatment of both primary and metastatic tumors, thus providing a novel therapeutic strategy for SB-3CT and ICB therapy to enhance immunotherapy efficacy.
Supplementary information
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. MMP2/9 associated with poor prognosis and cancer hallmarks. Fig. S2. Schematic of experimental tumor-bearing model for the combination treatment of SB-3CT and PD-1 blockade. Fig. S3. Expression of TILs in tumors from B16F10 xenograft mouse model with SB-3CT and PD-1 blockade. Fig. S4. Association of MMP2/9 score and PD-L1. Fig. S5. PD-L1 Expression through MMP2/9, SB-3CT with limited activity in the context of KD of MMP2 and MMP9. Fig. S6. Combination treatment of SB-3CT and CTLA-4 blockade in tumor-bearing model. Fig. S7. Expression of TILs in tumors from B16F10 xenograft mouse model with SB-3CT and CTLA-4 blockade. Fig. S8. Infiltration of functional immune cells in tumors from B16F10 xenograft mouse model with SB-3CT and CTLA-4 blockade. Fig. S9. Effects of SB-3CT in mouse model of B16F10 tumor with lung metastasis.