Prevalence and correlates of elder abuse: A cross-sectional, community-based study from rural Puducherry

Jan 16, 2020The National medical journal of India

How common elder abuse is and what factors are linked to it in rural Puducherry

AI simplified

Abstract

The prevalence of elder abuse in rural Puducherry is 50.2%.

Higher education status is associated with lower odds of experiencing elder abuse.
Elderly individuals with primary education have an odds ratio of 0.39 for suffering from abuse compared to those with no formal education.
Those with middle school education have an odds ratio of 0.35, while high school graduates show an odds ratio of 0.08 for abuse risk.
Individuals aged 80 years and above have higher odds of abuse, with an odds ratio of 3.02 compared to those under 80 years.
Factors such as sex, socioeconomic status, marital status, and living arrangements were adjusted for in the analysis.

AI simplified

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse is a neglected problem and needs to be addressed to improve the quality of life (QoL) of the elderly. We aimed to study the correlates of elder abuse in rural Puducherry.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, communitybased study among all the elderly people (60 years and above), from one of the four villages of a rural primary health centre in Puducherry. Participants were contacted at their homes. After obtaining consent, data were collected using (i) a structured, pre-tested questionnaire on sociodemographic details; (ii) elder abuse using the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test; and (iii) QoL using WHO QoL-BREF. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of elder abuse.

RESULTS: Of the 243 elderly individuals studied, 63% were women. The prevalence of elder abuse was 50.2%. On multivariable analysis, elderly with higher education status were found to have lower odds for suffering from abuse (primary education odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [0.18-0.84]; middle school OR 0.35 [0.14-0.86]; high school OR 0.08 [0.01-0.4]) compared to those with no formal education and those above 80 years of age were found to have higher odds for abuse (OR 3.02 [1.1-7.9]) compared to those <80 years, after adjusting for confounders such as sex, socioeconomic status, marital status and living arrangement.

CONCLUSION: Half the elderly in our sample suffered from abuse. The higher age group and absence of formal education emerged as independent predictors of elder abuse.

Abstract

Related papers

what lands in your inbox each week: