Pyronaridine–Artesunate versus Mefloquine plus Artesunate for Malaria

Apr 6, 2012The New England journal of medicine

Comparing pyronaridine-artesunate and mefloquine-artesunate treatments for malaria

AI simplified

Abstract

Efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate reached 99.2% for adequate clinical and parasitologic response at day 28.

  • Pyronaridine-artesunate demonstrated noninferiority to mefloquine plus artesunate for treating uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.
  • In the per-protocol population, the treatment difference between pyronaridine-artesunate and mefloquine plus artesunate was 1.4 percentage points.
  • Efficacy on day 42 was similar in both treatment groups, with pyronaridine-artesunate at 83.1% and mefloquine plus artesunate at 83.9%.
  • Patients in Cambodia had a median parasite clearance time of 64 hours, significantly longer than in other countries.
  • The recrudescence rate in Cambodia was higher for pyronaridine-artesunate compared to mefloquine plus artesunate, with 10.2% versus 0% respectively.
  • Elevated levels of aminotransferases were noted in patients receiving pyronaridine-artesunate, while two patients on mefloquine plus artesunate experienced seizures.

AI simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free