BMJ medicine

How well COVID-19 drug trials report side effects: a systematic review

Updated

Abstract

Among 56 reviewed clinical trials on covid-19 drugs, one in three had low or very low quality of reporting of adverse events.

  • No included study achieved a high score for the quality of reporting of adverse events.
  • 60.7% of trials had a moderate score, while 33.9% had a low score and 5.4% had a very low score.
  • All trials with a very low reporting score were randomised open label trials.
  • Journal articles published on PubMed under-reported 51% of serious adverse events compared to ClinicalTrials.gov summaries.
  • Risk assessment in these clinical trials did not meet recommended good practice standards for reporting.

Simplified

Key numbers

60.7%
Moderate Quality Reporting
Percentage of trials with moderate quality scores for adverse event reporting.
51%
Under-Reporting of Serious
Percentage of serious under-reported in journal articles compared to trial summaries.
39.3%
Low or Very Low Quality Reporting
Percentage of trials with low or very low quality scores for reporting .

Full Text

We can’t show the full text here under this license.

Funding

Competing interests

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the French National Research Agency (ANR Agence Nationale de la Recherche) for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free