What this is
- This research evaluates VER-027, a novel targeting both RSV-A and RSV-B subgroups.
- The vaccine was tested in a mouse model to assess its immunogenicity and protective efficacy.
- Results indicate that VER-027 induces strong immune responses and provides complete protection against RSV challenges.
Essence
- VER-027, an targeting RSV-A and RSV-B, induced robust antibody and T cell responses, fully protecting mice from viral challenges. This dual-targeting approach shows promise for broad RSV vaccine development.
Key takeaways
- VER-027 induced high levels of RSV pre-F-specific IgG antibodies, demonstrating strong humoral immunity against both RSV subgroups.
- All vaccinated mice exhibited complete protection against RSV-A and RSV-B challenges, regardless of the vaccine dose, indicating the vaccine's efficacy.
- VER-027 elicited significant CD8+ T cell responses specific to the RSV F protein, contributing to cellular immunity essential for viral clearance.
Caveats
- The study used a mouse model, which may not fully replicate human immune responses or vaccine efficacy in humans.
- Long-term safety and durability of immunity from VER-027 remain to be established through clinical trials.
Definitions
- mRNA vaccine: A type of vaccine that uses messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response.
- neutralizing antibodies (nAbs): Antibodies that defend against pathogens by neutralizing their biological effects, particularly in viral infections.
Simplified
Introduction
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially among infants and older adults.1 Each year, RSV is estimated to cause 33.1 million LRTI episodes, 3.2 million hospitalizations, and 118,000 deaths worldwide.1 In infancy, primary RSV infection frequently results in LRTIs, with 2%–3% of infected infants requiring hospitalization. These infections can progress to severe respiratory illnesses such as bronchiolitis, pneumonia, recurrent wheezing, and, in severe cases, respiratory failure. Importantly, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading single pathogen responsible for mortality in children under 1 year of age, with RSV ranking as the second most common cause in this population.2,3
RSV is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus that is classified into two major antigenic subgroups, A and B, based mainly on differences in the G glycoprotein.4,5 The RSV fusion (F) protein, in its fusion conformation, is a major target of virus-neutralizing antibodies and exhibits differences in surface-exposed regions between RSV A and RSV B. Both subgroups co-circulate worldwide, cause similar respiratory illnesses, and exhibit varying prevalence and severity between seasons. Although the F protein is relatively conserved, antigenic differences between RSV subgroups elicit distinct subgroup-specific immunity. Immunity induced by natural infection or vaccination confers incomplete immunity and optimizing cross-protection by including both subgroups in a vaccine should maximize vaccine-induced protection. This is supported by variation in neutralizing antibody potency and the waning of immunity between subgroups following vaccination.5,6
After the failure of the first RSV vaccine in the 1960s, which used formalin-inactivated whole virus and was associated with enhanced respiratory disease upon natural infection,7,8 substantial efforts have since focused on developing safer and more effective vaccines and therapeutics. For decades, despite intensive research, an RSV vaccine remained unavailable due to challenges such as immune evasion, antigenic variability, and concerns regarding vaccine safety and efficacy.9–12 However, the recent advances in RSV vaccine technology based on use of stabilized prefusion (pre-F) protein antigens led to the successful development of three recently licensed vaccines for older adults, representing a major advance in reducing RSV-related morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. Arexvy (recombinant, adjuvanted), developed by GSK, was approved in May 2023 for adults aged 60 and older. That same month, Pfizer’s Abrysvo (recombinant) was approved for maternal immunization to protect infants as well as for use in older adults (Table 1). GSK’s Arexvy is a protein-based RSV vaccine that incorporates the stabilized prefusion F protein derived from the RSV A subgroup, whereas Pfizer’s Abrysvo is a bivalent vaccine formulated with prefusion F proteins from both RSV A and B subgroups; notably, Abrysvo is specifically designed to elicit broad immune responses and confer protection against infections caused by both major RSV subgroups.5,13 In May 2024, Moderna’s mRNA-1345, marketed as mRESVIA, was approved for adults aged 60 and older (Table 1).14–16
Following the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, mRNA vaccines were rapidly developed, granted emergency use authorization, and administered to the eligible population, demonstrating approximately 90% efficacy and representing one of the fastest and most extensive global vaccination campaigns in history.17 Based on this technology platform, mRESVIA has been developed as an mRNA-based RSV vaccine. While current mRNA RSV vaccines are generally well tolerated and primarily associated with mild adverse effects such as injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and chills, rare severe events including allergic reactions and potential increases in severe RSV cases among infants have been reported.18,19 Furthermore, the long-term safety profile and durability of protective immunity against both subgroups with the current RSV mRNA vaccine remain largely undefined. Given their limited ability to overcome the antigenic diversity between RSV subgroups and the suboptimal cross-protection observed after natural infection, there is an urgent need for next-generation mRNA vaccines that can elicit broad, durable, and safe immunity against both subgroups.
In this study, we developed a novel mRNA-based RSV vaccine (VER-027) encoding the F protein of both RSV subgroups A and B and evaluated its immunogenicity and prophylactic efficacy in a BALB/c mouse model. VER-027 immunization induced robust pre-F–specific IgG responses and potent neutralizing activity against both subgroups, demonstrating strong RSV-specific humoral immunity. In parallel, VER-027 induced RSV-specific cellular immunity, characterized by the activation of functionally active CD8+ T cells targeting the immunodominant F protein epitope (F85–93). To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first investigation of an RSV mRNA vaccine specifically engineered to target both RSV subgroups. By demonstrating complete protection against challenge with either subgroup, our findings provide proof-of-concept for the effectiveness of a dual-targeting approach. This strategy offers a promising pathway toward the development of a broad-spectrum RSV vaccine capable of addressing the genetic and antigenic diversity that contributes to the global burden of RSV disease.
| Name | Vender | Subgroups | Platform | Adjuvant | Efficacy Elderly (E) | Efficacy Maternal (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrysvo | Pfizer | A and B | Prefusion F protein | N/A | 89% (79% in the season 2). [006] | 67.7% at 90 d following birth. The efficacy lowers to 56.8% after 180. [006] |
| Arexvy | GSK | A only | Prefusion F protein | AS01 | 83% (77% at 14 mo). [006] | N/A |
| mRESVIA | Moderna | A only | mRNA | N/A | 83.7% (63% after 8.6 mo). [006] | N/A |
Methods
Cells and propagation of RSV strains
HEp-2 cells were obtained from ATCC (CCL-23) and maintained in complete Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomycin. Sub-confluent HEp-2 monolayers were inoculated with RSV strains (mKate2 A2, B1, or mKate2 BAF-BAG) and rocked at room temperature (RT) for 1 h to facilitate viral adsorption. Following this, cultures were incubated until peak viral titers were achieved. Virus stocks were then harvested and titrated as previously described.20
Mice
Pathogen-free 6- to 8-week-old female BALB/c (H-2d) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). All animal procedures and husbandry were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), under approved protocol number PROTO201800280.
Preparation of mRNA for manufacturing
Plasmid templates for RSV-F mRNAs were prepared using the EndoFree Plasmid Maxi Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 100 μg of supercoiled plasmid DNA was linearized with BspQI (NEB) at 50 °C for 2 h. In vitro transcription was carried out in a 400 μl reaction containing 20 μg linearized DNA, 5 mM each of ATP, CTP, GTP, and m1UTP (N1-methylpseudo UTP), 4 mM SmartCap SC101, 1× T7 RNA polymerase buffer, 16.3 KU T7 RNA polymerase, 320 U RNase inhibitor, and 0.8 U YPP. The reactions were incubated at 42 °C for 4 h followed by DNase I digest (160 U, 37 °C, 1 hr), and mRNA was purified using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (30 K, Merck Millipore) by centrifugation (6,000 × g, 16 °C, 10 min) with repeated washes until the A260/230 ratio was ≥2.0. The RNA was recovered by inverted centrifugation (6,000 × g, 16 °C, 2 min). Integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis following heat denaturation (75 °C, 4 min and 4 °C, 5 min).
Formulation of mRNA-LNP (STL1244)
STL1244 cells were prepared as described in prior studies.21,22 Briefly, LNPs were formulated by mixing lipid components and an aqueous mRNA solution using a microfluidic device (Nanoassembly Ignite +, Precision Nanosystems, Canada). A novel ionizable lipid, STP1244 (chemically synthesized by ST Pharm), was mixed with DOPE (helper lipid; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), cholesterol (structural lipid; Sigma-Aldrich), and C16 PEG2000-Ceramide (PEG-lipid; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, Alabama, USA) at a defined molar ratio of STP1244: DOPE: cholesterol: C16 PEG2000-Ceramide = 36.5:15:52:1.5 (mol %). The lipid components dissolved in ethanol and mRNA dissolved in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer were mixed at a 1:1 volume ration and formulated using a microfluidic device at a total flow rate of 12 mL/min. The resulting LNPs were diafiltrated with 1 × PBS and concentrated in Tris buffer containing sucrose using ultrafiltration (Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit, Sigma-Aldrich). Concentrated LNPs were stored at −20 °C until further use. To determine mRNA concentration and encapsulation efficiency, a RiboGreen assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was performed using a spectrofluorometer (FP-8350, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). The size distribution and zeta potential of the well-dispersed LNPs in 1 × PBS were measured by a dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Zetasizer Ultra instrument (Malvern, UK) at a 173° scattering angle at RT.
In vitro transcription (IVT)
DNA template sequence for mRNA in vitro transcription (IVT) consisted of T7 promoter, 5′ untranslated region (UTR), and an open reading frame of RSV prefusion form modified from the RSV fusion glycoprotein (GenBank protein ID: AAB59858.1↗ for genotype A2 and AAB82429.1↗ for B1), 3′ UTR and 120 bases of poly adenine (polyA). The 5′ UTR and 3′ UTR are from the human globin alpha gene. The DNA fragment was synthesized and subcloned into a pUC57-Kan vector by GenScript (Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). The plasmid vector was linearized using the restriction enzyme BspQI (New England Biolabs) to obtain RSV fusion protein. N1-Methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) was purchased from BOC Sciences (New York, USA). IVT condition was performed according to the manufacture’s recommendation (TranscriptAid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit, ThermoFisher Scientific): ATP/CTP/GTP/m1ψTP: (5 mM each), SmartCap (SC101, 4 mM, ST Pharm, Seoul, ROK), Linear template DNA (1 μg of plasmid), and T7 RNA polymerase enzyme mix (2 μl) was used for the experiment. IVT was carried out in a 20 μl reaction mixture incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The template DNA was removed using 2 units of DNase I (ThermoFisher Scientific) and treated at 37 °C for 15 min followed by column purification (Monarch RNA Cleanup Kit, New England Biolabs).
Transfection
One microgram of mRNAs was transfected into 293FT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) cells in a 12 well plate using Lipofectamine MesseangerMax (ThermoFisher Scientific) at a ratio of 1:2 according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Western blot
Cell pellets were lysed with NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM sodium chloride/1% NP-40/50 mM Tris, pH 8.0) after 24 h of transfection. The cell lysates were harvested after centrifugation and loaded onto the SDS-PAGE gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred onto a 0.45 μm PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). The PVDF membranes were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) in tris-buffered saline buffer (TBS, Bio-Rad) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Bio-Rad) for 1 h at RT. The membranes were washed 3 times with 1 × TBST and incubated for 1 h with rabbit anti-RSV fusion glycoprotein antibody (10049-R302, Sino Biological at 1:1,000 in TBST) and anti-GAPDH (sc-47724, Santa Cruz at 1:1,000 in TBST) at room temperature. The membranes were then washed three times with 1 × TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch at 1:5,000 in TBST) for 1 h at RT. The membranes were washed three times with 1 × TBST and SuperSignal West Pico Plus Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for protein detection.
RSV mRNA vaccine administration, sample collection, and viral challenge
Groups of mice (n = 20 per group) were vaccinated intramuscularly (i.m.) with 2, 10, or 20 μg of VER-027, administered twice at 3-wk intervals. Two control groups were included: a naïve group and an LNP-only control group. Serum samples were collected from all groups at 2, 5, and 7 wk via sub-mandibular bleeding. Mice were anesthetized via intramuscular injection of a ketamine-xylazine solution and infected intranasally (i.n.) with either 3 × 105 PFU mkate2 RSV A2 strain or 2 × 106 PFU RSV B1 strain in 100 μl of plain EMEM. For direct inoculation, mice were held upright with fully extended necks and readily inhaled a 100 μl volume of undiluted stock virus dispensed onto their nostrils using a micropipette. Mice were monitored for pain, distress or suffering. The mice were then euthanized on day 4 post infection (p.i.) and the lungs, spleen, and blood were collected for downstream virological and immunological analyses.
Lung viral plaque assay
Mice were euthanized on day 4 p.i. by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of Fatal Plus, and lungs were harvested for downstream analysis. A mini-BeadBeater-96 (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Oklahoma, USA) was used to homogenize the lungs as described.23 Lung homogenates were serially diluted in serum-free EMEM and inoculated onto sub-confluent HEp-2 cells in 24-well plates. After a 1 h adsorption period at RT on a rocking platform to ensure uniform viral attachment, the inoculum was removed, and the cells were overlaid with minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.75% methylcellulose. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 for 6 d. Following incubation, the overlay medium was carefully removed, and the cell monolayers were fixed in cold methanol at −80 °C for a minimum of 60 min. Viral plaques were then detected via immunostaining with RSV-specific primary antibodies and subsequent colorimetric visualization, as previously described.24–26
RNA isolation from lung tissues and RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNAs were extracted from lung using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80 °C. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by using qScriptTM XLT One-Step RT-qPCR ToughMix (Quantibio LLC.), and a Roche 480 II lightcycler. The thermal cycling conditions were 45 °C for 10 min and 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 45 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s for denaturing and annealing, respectively. Primer 3 software (https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0↗) was used to design primers and probe. The primers and probes for RSV B1 Fusion (F) gene (forward, 5′-CCTTCTTTCCACAGGCTGAC-3′; reverse, 5′-TCCCACGATTTTTGTTGGAT-3′, probe, 5′ Fam- CCAAGTGAA/ZEN/GTCAGCCTTTG -BHQ-1 3′) were synthesized by Integrated DNA technologies (IDT) (Coralville, Iowa, USA). All samples were run in triplicate including a nontemplate control (sterile, PCR-grade water) and positive control comprised of an extended standard of the amplicon region. Viral copy numbers were quantified and compared to those of the standard controls.
IgG ELISA targeting RSV prefusion (F) Protein
RSV prefusion (F)-specific IgG antibody titers in serum samples were evaluated using ELISA. Due to institutional animal care guidelines limiting blood collection to approximately 250 µl per 25 g mouse every 2–3 wk, serum volumes obtained at weeks 2, 5, and 7 post-prime were insufficient to perform both IgG ELISA and neutralization assays on individual samples. Therefore, sera were pooled within each experimental group to enable completion of all planned immunogenicity analyses. Briefly, ELISA plate was coated overnight at RT with an RSV prefusion glycoprotein F0 (Acrobiosystems LLC) (2 µg/ml). The next day, the plates were washed with PBS-Tween (PBST) (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS) using the BioTech ELx50 plate washer and blocked with 1% BSA at RT for 2 h. Following blocking and PBST washing, pooled serially diluted mouse serum samples were added and incubated at 4 °C overnight. Then, goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP) diluted 1:3,000 in blocking solution was applied and incubated at RT for 1 h. The plates were again washed with PBST, and 1-Step Ultra TMB ELISA substrate (ThermoFisher LLC.) was applied to catalyze a colorimetric reaction. The reaction was stopped using the SeraCare KPL TMB stop solution. The plates were read at 450 nm using a BioTek Cytation 3. The background absorbance was subtracted from the sample absorbance readings, and the data were plotted on a graph.
Evaluation of neutralizing antibodies in serum samples
HEp-2 cells were seeded at 3.0 × 104 cells per well in 96-well plates and cultured overnight. Mouse serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min and serially diluted in 1× PBS without Calcium and Magnesium. mKate2 A2 (RSV A strain) or mKate2 BAF-BAG (RSV B strain) was diluted in in serum-free EMEM to a final concentration of 100 FFU per well and incubated with the serially diluted mouse sera. This virus-serum mixture was rocked at RT for 1 h to allow antibody-RSV interaction. Following incubation HEp-2 cells were infected with the mixture and spinoculated at 3,000 rpm for 30 min. Subsequently, 150 µl of complete EMEM/10% FBS/penicillin G/streptomycin/0.75% methylcellulose was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 36 to 48 h. FFUs were quantified using the BioTek Cytation 7, which detects the far-red fluorescent mKate2 reporter (561 nm). All samples were evaluated in duplicate, and data were normalized using negative controls (mock-infected HEp-2 cells) and positive controls (RSV without serum).
Evaluation of cellular immune responses
Teramer staining and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) were performed to enumerate RSV F85-93 specific CD8+ T cells and cytokine-producing cells as described previously.25,27 In brief, freshly isolated splenocytes (2 × 106) were left untreated, stimulated with individual peptide (RSV F85-93 KYKNAVTEL, 1 μg/sample, Genscript), or stimulated with cell stimulation cocktail (Thermo Fisher, Cat no. 00-4970-93) for 6 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in the presence of brefeldin A (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, California, USA). TruStain FcXTM (anti-mouse CD16/32, BioLegend, Cat no. 101320) was used to inhibit non-specific binding of surface staining antibodies. Then, cells were subsequently stained with a viability dye (Zombie aqua, BioLegend, Cat no. 423102) to determine live/dead cells. Next, cell surface staining including tetramer staining was performed with PE-H-2Kd F85-93 tetramer (NIH tetramer facility, Atlanta, Georgia, USA), BV605-CD3 (BD Biosciences, Cat # 564009), eFluor 450-CD4 (RM4-5, Thermofisher, Cat no. 48-0042-82), APC-Cy7-CD8 (BD Biosciences, Cat no. 557654) for 30 min at 4 °C, followed by permeabilization using Cytofix/Cytoperm (Fisher Scientific, Cat no. BD 555028). The following intracellular stains were used to quantify cytokine production, FITC-IFN-γ (BioLegend, Cat no. 503806), PE/Cyanine7-IL-2 (BioLegend, Cat # 503832), Alexa Fluor-TNF-α (BioLegend, Cat no. 506314). Fluorescence was measured using Symphony 5 (BD Immunocytometry Systems) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashlan, Oregon, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, California, USA). Comparisons between 2 groups were assessed with a 2-tailed Student’s t test, while comparisons across more than 2 groups were evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test to account for multiple comparisons. Data values below limits of detection were assigned a value of half the limit of detection. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
Results
Generation of RSV mRNA vaccine candidate (VER-027)
A novel mRNA-based RSV vaccine candidate, VER-027, was rationally designed to express the prefusion-stabilized F glycoprotein from both RSV genotypes A and B. The prefusion conformation of the F protein is well-established as the optimal immunogen for eliciting potent neutralizing antibody responses.11 To maintain the prefusion state, four stabilizing substitutions (S155C, S190F, V207L, and S290C) were introduced into the F protein sequence. Each mRNA component was synthesized via T7 RNA polymerase–driven in vitro transcription (IVT) from DNA templates containing a T7 promoter, 5′ untranslated region (UTR), the prefusion F gene, 3′ UTR, and a 120-nt polyadenylated tail (Fig. 1A and B). Transient transfection of 293FT cells with an equal amount of the resulting mRNAs demonstrated robust expression of the RSV F proteins. Western blot analysis of cell lysates collected 24 h post-transfection confirmed that the engineered constructs predominantly expressed the prefusion conformation, as evidenced by a distinct migration pattern compared to wild-type F (pre-FA vs. wt-FA; Fig. 1C). For vaccine formulation, the pre-FA and pre-FB mRNAs were co-encapsulated in a proprietary ionizable lipid nanoparticle (LNP) system (STLNP®) to generate VER-027. Prior to in vivo immunogenicity assessment, formulation integrity and functionality were validated by transfecting 293FT cells with VER-027, which reproduced the protein expression profiles observed with individual mRNA transfections (Fig. 1D).
Design, production, and expression validation of RSV mRNA vaccine candidates. (A) Schematic representation of the DNA template used fortranscription, containing a T7 promoter, 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), the open reading frame encoding the RSV prefusion F protein (RSV-F), and a 120-nt poly(A) tail. (B) In vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase generated mRNAs encoding prefusion-stabilized F proteins from RSV genotypes A (pre-F) and B (pre-F), as well as the wild-type F protein from genotype A (wt-F). Products were resolved on a 1% agarose gel. (C) Expression of RSV-F proteins following transfection of 293FT cells with 1 μg of each mRNA, assessed by immunoblot analysis 24 h post-transfection. (D) Verification of F protein expression from the formulated mRNA–LNP vaccine candidate (VER-027) following transfection of 293FT cells with 0.8 μg or 2.4 μg of the formulation. in vitro pre A B A
Humoral immune responses induced by the VER-027 mRNA vaccine in a BALB/c mouse model
Following confirmation of the size and in vitro expression of the VER-027 vaccine, we proceeded to manufacture the formulation and assess its immunogenicity in mice. VER-027 was formulated to harbor equal amounts of the 2 subgroup pre-F mRNAs. Here, we selected the BALB/c mouse model because it is well established in our laboratory and is known for its documented susceptibility to RSV infection, providing reproducible immune responses that facilitate evaluation of both humoral and cell–mediated protection.26,28,29 These characteristics make it a genetically uniform, well-characterized, and reliable system for preclinical assessment of RSV vaccine efficacy and safety. Groups of BALB/c mice were primed and boosted with VER-027 at doses of 2, 10, or 20 µg total mRNAs, administered 3 wk apart, as illustrated in Fig. 2. The RSV F protein mediates viral entry and cell-cell fusion, forming syncytia, and undergoes a transition from a metastable prefusion (pre-F) to a stable postfusion (post-F) state, making it the main target of neutralizing antibodies (nAb).30 Multiple studies have demonstrated that pre-F specific IgG responses play a crucial role in protection against RSV infection, with the pre-F conformation eliciting higher levels of neutralizing antibodies compared to the post-F form, suggesting greater potential for effective immunity.31,32 Thus, we hypothesized that VER-027 would elicit robust humoral immune responses, supporting its potential as a promising new mRNA vaccine candidate. To examine this, we measured RSV pre-F–specific IgG responses at weeks 2, 5, and 7 after the prime, as well as neutralizing antibody titers following challenge with both RSV A and B strains. As shown in Fig. 3, serum samples from mice vaccinated with VER-027 exhibited significantly higher levels of RSV pre-F specific IgG antibodies compared to those from mice vaccinated with control LNP or naïve mice. While a clear difference in pre-F–specific IgG levels was observed between the 2 µg and the 10 or 20 µg groups only at two weeks post-prime, no significant differences were detected among the vaccinated groups at 5 or 7 wk following priming.
Protection against RSV infection has been shown to correlate positively with elevated serum neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers, while higher nAb levels are inversely associated with the risk of progression from infection to lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in children.33,34 Accordingly, we next quantified serum nAb titers to evaluate whether VER-027 vaccination can elicit subgroup-specific responses against both RSV A and RSV B, as detailed in the Methods. Stored serum samples were heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min and nAb titers were assessed against the mkate2 A2 strain (Fig. 4A) or the recombinant mkate2 BAF BAG strain expressing RSV F and G protein from Buenos Aires B strain (Fig. 4B), generated using reverse genetics. As shown in Fig. 4, all VER-027 immunized mice exhibited robust nAb titers compared with naive or control LNP immunized mice. Week 2 post-prime nAb titers were excluded from analysis due to levels being below the reliable detection threshold (data not shown). Boost vaccination led to a significant increase in nAb titers across all dose groups. Collectively, these results clearly demonstrated that VER-027 elicited robust humoral immune responses, including RSV pre-F–specific IgG and nAbs against both RSV A and RSV B subgroups.
Mouse immunization schedule. Six-week-old BALB/c mice (= 20 per group) were primed with VER-027 on day 0 and boosted with the same vaccine platform on day 21 (week 3). Serum samples were collected at weeks 2, 5, and 7 via mandibular bleeding. Mice were challenged with either RSV A strain or RSV B strain on day 84 (63 d post-boost) and were sacrificed on day 4 p.i. This figure was created using BioRender.com. n
RSV prefusion specific IgG responses. BALB/c mice (= 20 per group) were immunized with VER-027 2, 10, or 20 µg. Naive mice and those receiving control LNP served as negative controls. Serum samples were collected via mandibular bleeding at 2, 5, and 7 wk post-prime, and RSV prefusion specific IgG levels were quantified by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was determined using 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-test in Graph Pad Prism. **< 0.01, ***< 0.001. n P P
Serum nAb responses to RSV A (A) and B (B) strains. BALB/c mice (= 20 per group) were immunized with VER-027 at 2, 10, or 20 µg doses. Naïve mice and control LNP immunized mice served as negative controls. Serum samples were collected via mandibular bleeding at 2, 5, and 7 wk post-prime and pooled within each group. nAb titers against RSV A (A) and RSV B (B) were measured in pooled serum samples. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test using Graph Pad Prism. ***< 0.001. n P
Induction of F-specific cellular immunity by VER-027 mRNA vaccine in a BALB/c mouse model
In addition to humoral immunity, cellular immune responses are critical for protection against RSV infection, with RSV-specific CD8+ T cells playing a key role in viral clearance and recovery.24,35–37 To evaluate RSV-specific cellular immune responses, we performed MHC class I tetramer staining for the RSV F85–93 epitope, along with intracellular cytokine staining following in vitro restimulation with the F85–93 peptide. The RSV F85-93, an immunodominant cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope within the RSV F protein, exhibits Kd-restricted specificity.38 By employing an MHC class I tetramer containing the F85-93 epitope (KYKNAVTEL) synthesized at the NIH tetramer facility (Atlanta, Georgia, USA), we successfully visualized and quantified F85-93-specific CD8+ T cell response in RSV challenged BALB/c mice. Importantly, this tetramer was applicable to both RSV A and B strains, as the epitope sequence was identical in our challenge strains (mkate2 RSV A2 and RSV B1). The representative flow cytometry gating strategy for surface markers, shown in Fig. S1, was used to sequentially identify single, viable CD3+ T cells and further delineate the CD8+ T cell population, within which F85–93-specific cells were quantified using the MHC class I tetramer. As shown in Fig. 5, all VER-027 vaccinated mice increased F85–93-specific CD8+ T cell responses, ranging from 1.4% to 1.7% of total CD8+ T cells following challenge with either RSV A or RSV B strains. In contrast, naïve mice and those immunized with control LNP exhibited only minimal frequencies (< 0.1%) of F85–93-specific CD8+ T cells. Consistent with humoral responses, no dose-dependent differences were observed among mice receiving 2, 10, or 20 µg of VER-027. Although day 4 p.i. is generally considered early for the detection of RSV-induced CD8+ T cell responses, a substantial population of F85–93-specific CD8+ T cells was readily detected in VER-027–immunized mice. These findings suggest that VER-027 induces a rapid and robust RSV F-specific cellular immune response against both RSV subgroups.
Next, we quantified cytokine production by CD8+ T cells, specifically IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, to evaluate their functional activity (Fig. 6). Upon re-stimulation with the RSV F85-93 peptide, naïve and control LNP-vaccinated mice exhibited minimal cytokine production, whereas VER-027 vaccinated mice showed a significantly higher frequency of CD3+CD8+ T cells producing these cytokines. The hierarchy of cytokine production followed the pattern IFN-γ > TNF-α > IL-2. Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells were not directly gated in this assay. However, our analyses indicate that only approximately 10% of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells produce TNF or IFN-γ upon F85-93 peptide restimulation, corresponding to ∼0.1%–0.2% cytokine-positive cells among ∼1.5% tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (data not shown). Accordingly, the frequency of cytokine-producing cells detected by intracellular cytokine staining is expected to be lower than the total tetramer+ population. In addition, these analyses were performed using splenocytes rather than lung-derived lymphocytes, which typically exhibit lower frequencies of effector CD8+ T cells at the time point analyzed. Furthermore, the F85–93 epitope is a subdominant CD8+ T cell epitope in BALB/c mice, whereas M282–90 is immunodominant, which may further contribute to the relatively modest magnitude of the observed antigen-specific response. Since splenocytes were restimulated with a CTL-restricted epitope, RSV F85-93 specific CD4+ T cell responses were minimal, indicating a lack of cross-reactivity between RSV F85-93 specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses. In Fig. S2, CD8+ T cells exhibited distinct intracellular cytokine staining profiles across the three restimulation conditions, as illustrated by representative gating of negative control, positive control, and F85–93 peptide–stimulated samples. While CD4+ T cells did not generate F85–93–specific cytokine responses (data not shown), they demonstrated a high frequency of cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 following PMA/ionomycin restimulation. These results indicate that CD4+ T cells are healthy and fully capable of producing cytokines, and that the absence of an F85–93–specific response is not due to T cell dysfunction, but rather reflects the MHC class I–restricted nature of this epitope.
Direct enumeration of Fepitope-specific CD8T cells. BALB/c mice were immunized intramuscularly twice with the VER-027. Naive mice and mice receiving control LNP served as negative controls. Four days post challenge with RSV A2 strain or RSV B1 strain, splenocytes were harvested and analyzed via flow cytometry following staining with the Ftetramer. (A) Representative flow cytometry dot plot depicting Fepitope-specific CD8T cells. The gated population represents tetramer-binding CD8T cells, and the values within the gate indicate the frequency of CD8T cells specific for the Fepitope. (B) Quantitative analysis derived from the raw data. A graph generated from raw data, where each dot represents an individual measurement, with reproducibility confirmed across independent experiment. Statistical significance was assessed by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test using Graph Pad Prism. ***< 0.001. 85–93 85–93 85–93 85–93 + + + + P
RSV F-specific CD8T cells cytokine responses in BALB/c mice. All 3 VER-027 vaccinated groups (2, 10, and 20 µg) and two control groups (naive and control LNP) were challenged with RSV A2 (A) or RSV B1 (B) on day 63 following post-boost. Four days after challenge, splenocytes were isolated and re-stimulated in vitro with cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) epitope peptide (F) for 6 h in the presence of Brefeldin A (BFA), which inhibits protein transport to facilitate intracellular cytokine accumulation. The percentages of CD3CD8T cells expressing IFN-γ, TNF-α, or IL-2 are shown for each group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test using Graph Pad Prism. ***< 0.001. 85-93 85-93 + + + P
VER-027 vaccination protects mice completely regardless of the doses
Extensive analyses of recent clinical isolates from multiple global regions reveal the co-circulation of RSV-A and RSV-B subgroups, with strain predominance fluctuating over time.39,40 Because both subgroups contribute to ongoing transmission and disease burden, these findings emphasize the necessity of developing vaccines that provide broad protection against both RSV-A and RSV-B. To the best of our knowledge, VER-027 represents the first mRNA vaccine candidate designed to target both RSV A and B subgroups concurrently. Protective efficacy was evaluated by assessing lung viral loads following intranasal challenge with either the RSV mKate2 A2 (subgroup A) or RSV B1 (subgroup B) strain. All immunized mice were challenged at 63 days post-boost, a time point corresponding to the memory phase of vaccine-induced immunity. This design allowed us to specifically evaluate the durability and effectiveness of VER-027 in mediating long-term protective immune responses. Naive mice and those immunized with control LNP were included as controls, and left lungs were harvested 4 d p.i. While we initially hypothesized that vaccine efficacy would vary in a dose-dependent manner, plaque assay analysis of RSV subgroup A challenge (Fig. 7A) and RT-qPCR quantification following RSV subgroup B challenge (Fig. 7B) demonstrated that all vaccinated groups, irrespective of administered dose, exhibited complete protection in contrast to naive or control LNP-immunized mice, which displayed high viral loads. This complete protection significantly correlated with (1) high pre-F specific IgG production, (2) robust anti-RSV neutralization activity for both A and B subgroups, and (3) significant F85-93-specific, functionally active CD8+ T cell responses.
Lung viral loads following RSV A2 or B1 challenge. BALB/c mice were immunized with VER-027 2, 10, or 20 µg, with naive and control LNP immunized mice serving as negative controls. Mice (= 20 per group) were challenged with RSV A2 or RSV B1 63 d after the boost. Lungs were harvested on day 4 p.i., and viral titers were determined by plaque assay for RSV A2 (A) or RT-qPCR for RSV B1 (B). The dotted horizontal line indicates the limit of detection. Statistical significance determined by comparing VER-027–vaccinated groups with the control LNP group (***< 0.001). n P
Discussion
Herein, we developed a novel mRNA-based RSV vaccine candidate, VER-027, which encodes the prefusion (pre-F) forms of both subgroups A and B F proteins. The humoral and cellular immune responses, along with the protective efficacy of three doses of VER-027, were evaluated in a BALB/c mouse model. We found that VER-027 induced high levels of RSV-specific IgG and nAb titers against both RSV-A and RSV-B strains, elicited strong cellular immune responses, and conferred complete protection against challenge with either subgroup.
Since the discovery of RSV in the 1950s, numerous efforts have been made to develop a vaccine against RSV. Safety concerns and an incomplete understanding of immune correlates of protection have long impeded the development of effective RSV vaccines.8,41 The recent licensure of subunit and mRNA vaccines targeting the prefusion F protein demonstrates that these barriers can be overcome. The approval of 3 RSV vaccines by the FDA marks a major step forward. Yet, these vaccines continue to present important limitations: (1) efficacy is moderate, ranging from 70% to 80%, with long-term durability remaining uncertain, (2) post-marketing surveillance studies have identified a rare but increased risk of Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) with the 2 protein-based vaccine, whereas no such safety signal has been observed to date with the mRNA-based RSV vaccine, suggesting a potentially more favorable GBS safety profile,42,43 (3) the ongoing circulation of both RSV-A and RSV-B strains raises concern about the breadth of protection. Collectively, these limitations highlight an unmet need for next-generation mRNA vaccines that can elicit broad, durable, and highly efficacious immune responses. Achieving greater than 95% efficacy against RSV infections stands as a critical benchmark for our novel vaccine candidate.
The success history of mRNA vaccines is relatively limited, as this platform only achieved its first widespread regulatory approval in 2021 with the rapid authorization of COVID.17,44 Compared with traditional vaccine platforms, mRNA vaccine platform offers rapid design, scalable manufacturing, and potent immunogenicity without the use of live virus.45 Here, we developed an RSV mRNA vaccine candidate, VER-027, which incorporates two key innovative design elements, (1) a novel mRNA-engineered antigen design strategy, and (2) proprietary chemical innovations from ST Pharm, Co. Ltd (Seoul, Korea) including SmartCap technology for optimized 5′ capping and ionizable STLNP® for efficient lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery. The GLP-grade VER-027 formulations, manufactured by ST Pharm, contain 2 separate mRNA molecules, each encoding either the RSV subgroup A or B Pre-F protein. In fact, these chemical technologies were also utilized in a highly effective Severe fever thrombolysis syndrome virus (SFTSV) mRNA vaccine formulation that was recently reported.21
For preclinical evaluation of VER-027, we selected BALB/c mice as the animal model because they provide a well-characterized and reproducible system for RSV research. BALB/c mice are widely used in RSV challenge studies, owing to their susceptibility to infection, defined immunological background, and the availability of established reagents and readouts for T cell and antibody responses. Importantly, this model allows for comprehensive assessment of vaccine-induced immunogenicity, antiviral activity, and protective efficacy, thereby providing a robust foundation for advancing VER-027 toward further preclinical and clinical development.46–49 The robust humoral and cellular responses elicited by VER-027 underscore its strong immunogenic potential. By inducing high titers of pre-F–specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies, along with F85–93–specific CD8+ T cell responses, VER-027 appears to promote a balanced and comprehensive immune profile. Importantly, the sustained protection observed against both RSV A and B challenge at 63 d post-boost, well beyond the typical timeframe of 35 d post-boost for memory establishment in mice, suggests that VER-027 generates long-lived, functional memory responses rather than transient effector activity. This durability highlights the vaccine’s potential to confer lasting immunity and supports its promise as a broadly protective RSV candidate. The ability of VER-027 to elicit sustained memory protection is particularly important in the context of RSV, where reinfections are common throughout life and long-term immunity has proven difficult to achieve. These findings support the potential of VER-027 to provide prolonged protection across different RSV subgroups and highlight its promise as a vaccine candidate with the capacity to overcome one of the major challenges in RSV vaccinology.
As we described in Table 1, two prefusion F–based vaccines, Pfizer’s bivalent RSV preF (Abrysvo) and GSK’s AREXVY, have recently been licensed for adults ≥ 60 yr, demonstrating high efficacy (∼80%–90%) against RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease over at least 2 seasons, along with robust boosting of RSV A and B neutralizing antibody titers. More recently, Moderna’s mRNA-based preF vaccine, mRESVIA, achieved ∼60%–70% efficacy against RSV-LRTD in older adults at increased risk, further supporting prefusion F–focused neutralizing antibody responses as a key correlate of protection. Although our preclinical study did not include these licensed products as positive controls, our vaccine similarly targets stabilized prefusion F, inducing high titers of RSV A and B neutralizing antibodies and a Th1-mediated cellular response. While direct quantitative comparisons are limited by differences in species, antigen formats, and dosing, the shared focus on prefusion F and the induction of broad neutralizing activity underscore the translational potential of our candidate and its relevance within the current landscape of RSV vaccine strategies.
Protection against RSV is mediated by a coordinated interplay of neutralizing antibodies, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, with their relative contribution depending on whether protection is defined as prevention of infection, reduction of viral load, or mitigation of immunopathology.50–52 Neutralizing antibodies, particularly those targeting the F protein, are the dominant correlate for preventing infection and early virus replication, as shown by prophylactic monoclonal antibody and serum neutralization studies that significantly reduce viral titers, morbidity, and mortality.53 CD4+ T cells provide essential help for high-quality antibody responses and can also contribute directly to protection or immunopathology depending on their polarization, with Th2-biased CD4 responses linked to enhanced respiratory disease in the FI-RSV model. CD8+ T cells are critical for efficient clearance of established RSV infection and can reduce lung viral load and disease severity. Overall, antibodies are primary for sterilizing or near-sterilizing immunity, CD8+ T cells are key for post-infection clearance, and CD4+ T cells are central modulators that shape both arms and can tip the balance toward protection versus vaccine-enhanced disease.
To date, most RSV mRNA vaccine studies have focused on adults and older populations, leaving an important knowledge gap regarding vaccine performance across broader human populations. While this study highlights the strong immunogenicity and protective efficacy of VER-027, some considerations remain. Mouse models, though valuable for dissecting immune mechanisms, may not fully capture human immune responses or disease. Likewise, the duration of immunity observed preclinically may differ in humans, and optimal dosing in small animals may not directly translate to clinical settings. Comprehensive clinical evaluation of VER-027 will therefore be essential to establish its protective efficacy against both RSV subgroups, assess the durability and breadth of immune responses, and define its safety profile, thereby informing its potential as a widely applicable RSV vaccine candidate. Taken together, our preclinical findings support VER-027 as a robust next-generation RSV vaccine candidate capable of protecting against both RSV subgroups A and B, with the potential to broaden protection to additional populations and address a critical global health need through durable memory responses.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the NIH Tetramer Core Facility (NIH Contract 75N93020D00005 and RRID: SCR_ 026557) for providing PE-H-2Kd F85-93 tetramer, as well as the Pediatrics/Winship Flow Cytometry Core for their assistance.
Contributor Information
Sujin Lee, Department of Pediatrics, Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States; Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jack Yoon, Vernagen, LLC, Tucker, GA, United States.
Savannah Shooter, Department of Pediatrics, Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States; Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States.
David S Pak, Vernagen, LLC, Tucker, GA, United States.
Binh Ha, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines, Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Christina A Rostad, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines, Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Larry J Anderson, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines, Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Raymond F Schinazi, Department of Pediatrics, Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States; Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Baek Kim, Department of Pediatrics, Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States; Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States; Vernagen, LLC, Tucker, GA, United States.
Author contributions
Sujin Lee (Conceptualization [Lead], Data curation [Lead], Formal analysis [Lead], Funding acquisition [Lead], Methodology [Lead], Validation [Lead], Writing—original draft [Lead], Writing—review & editing [Lead]), Jack Yoon (Conceptualization [Supporting], Data curation [Equal], Formal analysis [Equal], Validation [Equal], Writing—original draft [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), Savannah Shooter (Formal analysis [Supporting], Methodology [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), David S Pak (Formal analysis [Supporting], Methodology [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), Binh Ha (Formal analysis [Supporting], Methodology [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), Christina Rostad (Resources [Supporting], Validation [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), Larry Anderson (Resources [Supporting], Validation [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), Raymond Schinazi (Resources [Supporting], Validation [Supporting], Writing—review & editing [Supporting]), and Baek Kim (Conceptualization [Lead], Funding acquisition [Lead], Validation [Lead], Writing—original draft [Lead], Writing—review & editing [Lead])
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at ImmunoHorizons online.
Funding
This research was funded by the Vernagen Contract No. 0000074878 (S.L., L.J.A., and B.K.).
Conflicts of interest
R.F.S. is a scientific advisor and shareholder of Vernagen. His conflicts have been disclosed and approved by Emory University.
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding authors upon reseanable request.
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding authors upon reseanable request.