Full text is available at the source.
Comparison and Agreement Between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in Evaluating Patients' Eligibility for Delirium Assessment in the ICU
Comparing two sedation scales to decide if ICU patients can be checked for delirium
AI simplified
Abstract
In a cohort of 975 ICU admissions, the correlation between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) was 0.91.
- The agreement between RASS and SAS for assessing eligibility for delirium screening was estimated to be 0.93.
- 70.1% of patients were eligible for CAM-ICU assessment using RASS, while 72.1% were eligible using SAS.
- In mechanically ventilated patients, RASS identified 19.1% as CAM-ICU eligible compared to 24.6% identified by SAS.
- The correlation coefficient in the mechanically ventilated subgroup was 0.70, with an agreement of 0.81.
AI simplified