Trials

Sarilumab injections versus standard care in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: summary of a clinical trial plan

Updated

Abstract

A total of 30 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 will be evaluated for the effects of a single 400 mg dose of sarilumab on clinical outcomes.

  • Patients receiving sarilumab may experience less severe clinical status, as assessed by a 7-point ordinal scale, compared to those receiving standard care.
  • A reduction in the number of days in the hospital may be observed in patients treated with sarilumab.
  • The incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events will be monitored to assess the safety of sarilumab during hospitalization and up to 14 days after discharge.
  • Exploratory analysis will compare baseline clinical and biological markers, such as serum IL-6 levels, to identify potential candidates for sarilumab treatment.

Simplified

Key numbers

30 patients
Sample Size
30 patients will be randomized to receive either sarilumab or standard care.
2:1
Randomization Ratio
Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to sarilumab plus standard care vs. standard care.

Full Text

What this is

  • This protocol outlines a clinical trial evaluating sarilumab for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
  • The aim is to assess its efficacy in preventing severe disease progression compared to standard care.
  • The trial will recruit 30 patients, comparing outcomes over a 7-day period.

Essence

  • The trial investigates whether a single dose of sarilumab can improve clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

RGV declares no competing interests related to the present protocol; She reports she has received educational or research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Janssen Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Roche, and Sanofi; has received personal fees for advisory boards from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz and Sanofi; has delivered presentations sponsored by BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz and Sanofi; has received non-financial support for Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. FAS declares he has no competing interests. FRL is Medical Advisor at Sanofi Spain. He declares no competing interests related to the present protocol. IGA declares no competing interests related to the present protocol. He reports grants from ISCIII, grants from Fundación La Caixa; personal fees from Lilly, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees and non-financial support from Abbvie, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, non-financial support from MSD, non-financial support from Pfizer, non-financial support from Novartis, outside the submitted work; JSS declares he has no competing interests.
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free