Effectiveness of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Uganda: a three-arm, open-label, non-inferiority and superiority, cluster-randomised, controlled trial

Jan 18, 2025The Lancet. Infectious diseases

How well two drug combinations work for seasonal malaria prevention in Uganda: a community-based comparison trial

AI simplified

Abstract

3881 children were enrolled, yielding malaria incidence rates of 0.90 cases per 100 person-months for SPAQ and 0.80 for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine.

  • SPAQ reduced malaria risk by 94%, while dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine reduced it by 96%, compared to a control group.
  • The protective effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was shown to be non-inferior to SPAQ based on a predefined margin.
  • More than 88% of malaria cases exhibited mutations linked to moderate resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
  • Less than 1% of cases showed mutations associated with 4-aminoquinolone resistance.
  • There was a significant decrease in prevalence of key mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance.
  • No serious or fatal adverse events were reported during the trial.

AI simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free