What this is
- This research investigates the effects of psilocybin on in healthy individuals.
- It explores the association between psilocybin-induced mystical experiences and increases in mindfulness.
- The study also examines the relationship between pre-drug and serotonin 2A receptor (5-HTR) binding.
Essence
- Psilocybin administration leads to a significant increase in three months later, positively correlated with the intensity of mystical experiences. Additionally, lower pre-drug 5-HTR binding in the right amygdala is associated with higher mindfulness.
Key takeaways
- increased by 8.1% from baseline to three months after psilocybin administration. This suggests that psilocybin may enhance psychological well-being through mindfulness.
- The intensity of the is positively associated with increases in . This indicates that deeper mystical experiences may facilitate greater mindfulness.
- A significant negative association exists between pre-drug 5-HTR binding in the right amygdala and . This suggests that lower serotonin receptor availability may correlate with higher mindfulness levels.
Caveats
- The study's open-label design lacks a blinded control group, which may affect the validity of the findings. Additionally, the influence of external life circumstances on follow-up scores remains unaccounted for.
Definitions
- trait mindfulness: A stable disposition characterized by awareness and attention to the present moment, often linked to psychological health.
- mystical-type experience: An altered state of consciousness during psilocybin use, marked by feelings of unity, transcendence, and ineffability.
Simplified
Introduction
Psilocybin is a tryptamine alkaloid, naturally present in the Psilocybe genus of mushrooms, currently being researched as a promising therapeutic agent for a range of psychiatric disorders (Carhart-Harris and Goodwin, 2017; Andersen et al., 2021). In clinical studies, psilocybin shows immediate and sustained effects on depression (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016, 2018, 2021; Davis et al., 2021), obsessive-compulsive disorder (Moreno et al., 2006), anxiety and depression in terminal cancer patients (Grob et al., 2011; Griffiths et al., 2016; Ross et al., 2016), alcohol abuse (Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019) and smoking (Johnson et al., 2014, 2017). With increasing evidence in favor of positive effects of psilocybin, it is crucial to explore potential associated psychological factors. A small (n = 10) study has recently demonstrated increases in trait mindfulness in healthy individuals 3 months following a psilocybin session with no related mindfulness-training (Madsen et al., 2020). Similarly, significant increases in trait mindfulness have been observed as soon as 24 h after psilocybin intake in experienced meditators compared to placebo (Smigielski et al., 2019a). Trait mindfulness can be defined as “the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment.” (Kabat-Zinn, 2003, p. 145). It is positively associated with trait openness (Giluk, 2009), improved behavioral regulation (Keng et al., 2011) and positive bias (Kiken and Shook, 2011), and negatively associated with trait neuroticism (Giluk, 2009), emotional reactivity (Baer et al., 2006) and negative bias (Kiken and Shook, 2011), suggesting that higher trait mindfulness is an indicator of greater psychological health. Several techniques to evoke a state of mindfulness stem from Buddhist meditation (Kabat-Zinn, 2003; Bishop et al., 2004), and have been integrated as components of third-wave cognitive behavior therapy, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) (Hayes et al., 2006), Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) (Segal et al., 2002) and Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) (Kabat-Zinn, 1990), so called mindfulness-based interventions (MBI’s). Several researchers have postulated MBI as a framework for psychedelic drug administration due to similar phenomenology and psychological benefits that may act synergistically in combination (Heuschkel and Kuypers, 2020; Sloshower et al., 2020; Eleftheriou and Thomas, 2021). However, more empirical data is needed to gain a better understanding of how acute psychoactive effects of psilocybin are potentially associated with changes in trait mindfulness.
The psychoactive metabolite of psilocybin, psilocin, dose-dependently activates the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) (Vollenweider et al., 1998; Nichols, 2016; Madsen et al., 2019), alters cerebral functional network changes (Carhart-Harris et al., 2012; Madsen et al., 2021) and induces an altered state of consciousness characterized by three phases: ascent, peak and descent, lasting 4–6 h (Griffiths et al., 2011; Madsen et al., 2019; Stenbæk et al., 2020). The psilocybin-induced psychedelic experience has a unique phenomenology, including effects such as altered visual and auditory perception, audio-visual synesthesia, enhanced emotions and meaning-making and changes in sense of self (Preller and Vollenweider, 2018). Interestingly, when administered in medium-to-high doses (>12 mg), psilocybin can induce a highly meaningful experience (Griffiths et al., 2006, 2008) known as the mystical-type experience, characterized as an experience of unity with all that exists, a sense of awareness of the fundamental truths of reality, deepfelt blissful mood, transcendence of space and time and difficulty describing the experience with words, termed ineffability (Stace, 1960; Pahnke, 1963; Barrett and Griffiths, 2018). Having a mystical-type experience during psilocybin administration has been associated with persistent positive effects (McCulloch et al., 2022) and increases in trait openness (Maclean et al., 2011) in healthy volunteers, as well as improvements in symptoms in psychiatric patient populations (Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Griffiths et al., 2016; Ross et al., 2016; Roseman et al., 2018; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019). The psilocybin-induced mystical-type experience shares many phenomenological features with mindful states, including altered self-referential processing (Smigielski et al., 2019b). It is therefore possible that having a mystical experience in the context of psilocybin administration could be a catalyst for lasting changes in trait mindfulness.
We have recently reported a significant negative association between changes in neocortical 5-HT2AR binding 1 week after psilocybin administration and changes in trait mindfulness after 3 months (Madsen et al., 2020), suggesting an involvement of 5-HT2AR in trait mindfulness. We also found that lower pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding, i.e., unstimulated by psilocybin, predicted the temporal unfolding of psychoactive effects of psilocybin, including greater intensity of the mystical-type experience (Stenbæk et al., 2020). 5-HT2AR binding in selected frontolimbic brain regions has previously been positively associated to trait neuroticism (Frokjaer et al., 2008), a trait inversely related to trait mindfulness (Brown and Ryan, 2003; Giluk, 2009; Jensen et al., 2016). Given that 5-HT2AR is critical for the described mind-expanding effects of psilocybin (Vollenweider et al., 1998; Stenbæk et al., 2020), it is conceivable that 5-HT2AR may be involved in mindful and meditative states that are often also described as expanded states (Hölzel et al., 2011; Smigielski et al., 2019b). However, the association between pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding and trait mindfulness has not yet been investigated.
In the present study, we evaluate the effect of psilocybin on changes in trait mindfulness from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and whether the mystical-type experience during acute psilocybin administration is associated with these changes in trait mindfulness. Lastly, we explore whether pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding in neocortex and frontolimbic regions is associated with trait mindfulness. We hypothesize that: (1) Trait mindfulness will increase from baseline to 3-month following psilocybin administration, (2) The intensity of the mystical-type experience is positively associated with changes in trait mindfulness, and (3) Pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding in neocortex and frontolimbic regions is negatively associated with trait mindfulness.
Materials and methods
Participants
The study included 39 participants who received a psychoactive psilocybin dose (>12 mg) and completed baseline and 3-month follow-up measures of trait mindfulness, as well as a post-session measure of the mystical-type experience. Of these, seven participants completed two psilocybin interventions with new baseline and follow-up measures, at least 12 months apart (mean months between interventions (SD) [range]: 21 (5) [12–28]). Thus, in order to increase power for the analyses, a total of 46 datasets were included in the analyses pertaining to hypotheses (1) and (2). For the analyses pertaining to hypothesis (3), 32 of the included participants also completed a pre-drug Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan with the tracer [11C]-Cimbi-36 for imaging of 5-HT2AR binding in neocortex and frontolimbic regions (Ettrup et al., 2014, 2016).
All participants were recruited from a database of individuals volunteering to participate in human neuroimaging studies of psilocybin. Exclusion criteria included (a) present or previous psychiatric disorder in participant or immediate family, (b) present or previous neurological illness, severe somatic illness, or present medication that could affect the results, (c) non-fluency in Danish, vision or hearing impairment, (d) Present or previous learning disabilities, (e) current pregnancy or breastfeeding for women, (f) contraindications for MR-imaging, (g) alcohol or drug abuse, (h) allergy to the test drugs, (i) significant exposure to radioactivity within the past year, e.g., due to medical imaging, (j) ECG indicative of cardiac disease or use of medication causing prolonged QT-interval, (k) previous negative side-effects from hallucinogens, (l) use of psychedelics in the past 6 months, (m) blood donation less than 3 months before project participation, (n) hemoglobin <7.8 mM for women and 8.4 mM for men, (o) low plasma ferritin (<12 μg/L) and (p) bodyweight <50 kg. This was ensured through a complete physical and neurological exam, including ECG and blood screening for pathology, and a psychiatric screening, using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al., 1998).
Experimental procedures
Psilocybin interventions
Prior to the intervention day, participants met with the psychological support staff (one trained lead psychologist and one psychology trainee) to prepare for the psilocybin intervention, which included being informed about potential side-effects and safety precautions. On the intervention day, psilocybin was administered orally in 3 mg capsules with a glass of water based on a maximum weight-adjusted dose of 0.21 mg/kg (n = 12 sessions) or 0.31 mg/kg (n = 34 sessions). Of the 46 psilocybin interventions, 6 took place partly in a PET-scanner during acute effects (Madsen et al., 2019); 18 took place in a comfortable and private room (Madsen et al., 2020), and 22 took place partly in a MR-scanner during acute effects (Madsen et al., 2021). The psychological support staff members were present with the participant throughout the intervention day to provide interpersonal support. All participants met with the psychological support staff the day after intervention for an integration session. All preparation and integration sessions were standardized across interventions and were conducted by the same lead psychologist.
Outcome measures
Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale
We used the Danish version of the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) (Jensen et al., 2016) to assess the participants’ trait mindfulness at baseline and 3 months after the psilocybin intervention. The MAAS is a self-report scale, comprising 15 items related to general tendencies of inattentiveness toward emotions, thought, activities and physical sensations in the everyday experience, rated on a six-point Likert scale from one (almost always) to six (almost never). Example items include “I find it difficult to stay focused on what’s happening in the present” and “I find myself preoccupied with the future or the past.” The total MAAS score is calculated as the mean of all 15 items. Higher scores indicate higher degrees of trait mindfulness. The MAAS has a unidimensional construct with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for this dataset: baseline α = 0.86, follow-up α = 0.90) and good test-rest reliability (Brown and Ryan, 2003; Jensen et al., 2016).
Mystical Experience Questionnaire
Approximately 6 h after psilocybin administration on the intervention day, participants completed the Danish version of the 30-item version of the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) (Barrett et al., 2015). The MEQ is a self-report scale to assess the intensity of mystical experience related to a discrete event, such as during acute psilocybin effects. Participants rated each item on a 6-point Likert scale [0 = none at all, 5 = extreme (more than ever before in my life and stronger than 4)] on four subscales: mystical (e.g., “freedom from the limitations of your personal self and feeling of unity or bond with what was felt to be greater than your personal self”), positive mood (e.g., “experience of ecstasy”), transcendence of time and space (e.g., “loss of your usual sense of time”) and ineffability (e.g., “feeling that you could not do justice to your experience by describing it in words”). The total MEQ score is calculated as the mean of all items.
Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Thirty-two participants were scanned at baseline using High Resolution Research Tomography PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, USA) with an approximate in-plane resolution of 2 mm for 120 min after a bolus injection of [11C]-Cimbi-36 tracer to reflect and image 5-HT2AR binding (Ettrup et al., 2014, 2016). The scans were reconstructed into 45 frames (6 × 10 s, 6 × 20 s, 6 × 60 s, 8 × 120 s, 19 × 300 s). For the purpose of PET-image co-registration and segmentation, high resolution 3D T1-weighted and T2-weighted images were acquired on a 3T prisma magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), using either a 64-channel or a 32-channel head coil. Regional time-activity curves including cerebellum as a reference region were extracted, as previously described (Svarer et al., 2005), and kinetic modeling was done using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) to compute the regional non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) (Ettrup et al., 2014, 2016). Neocortical (a volume-weighted average of all cortical regions) [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND was chosen as our primary outcome region based on findings from our previous study (Madsen et al., 2020), the high expression of 5-HT2AR within neocortex (Beliveau et al., 2017) and the high degree of inter-regional correlation across neocortical subregions (Erritzoe et al., 2010; Spies et al., 2020). As secondary outcomes for post-hoc analyses, [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND in frontolimbic regions [frontal cortex, left and right amygdala and left and right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)] were chosen based on a previous study (Armand et al., 2022).
Data analysis
Psilocybin, Mystical Experience Questionnaire, and change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale
To evaluate the change in MAAS score from baseline to 3-month follow-up after psilocybin administration (Hypothesis 1) and its association with MEQ total score (Hypothesis 2), we used a linear mixed-effect model (LMM) for each hypothesis, as this model accounts for the repeated measures. To account for the seven participants who had completed two psilocybin interventions, participant-ID was included as a random effect. Baseline MAAS score was included as a covariate for Hypothesis 2, as magnitude of the change naturally is dependent on the baseline MAAS score due to the upper limit of the scale being six, and baseline MAAS has been associated to change in MAAS following a mindfulness-intervention (Shapiro et al., 2011). Although psilocybin dose and setting (Studerus et al., 2012) have been associated with acute psychedelic effects and positive psychological outcomes, inclusion of these as covariates in our model did not substantially affect the results, and were therefore not included in the final analyses. We report change in MAAS as the percentage change with a 95% confidence interval.
analysis of Mystical Experience Questionnaire subscales and change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale Post-hoc
In post-hoc analyses, we examined associations between change in MAAS and the individual MEQ subscales mystical, positive mood, transcendence of time and space, and ineffability, using the same LMM and under the same conditions presented in section “Psilocybin, Mystical Experience Questionnaire, and change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale.”
Pre-drug neocortical [C]-Cimbi-36 binding and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale 11
To evaluate the association between pre-drug neocortical [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND and MAAS score, (Hypothesis 3) we fit a linear regression model with [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND as independent variable and MAAS score as the dependent variable. Given that MAAS score is associated to age (Jensen et al., 2016) and body mass index (BMI) (Camilleri et al., 2015), these were included as covariates. Effects for the models are reported as unstandardized regression coefficients (β) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and adjusted R2 as a measure of variance.
analyses of pre-drug frontolimbic [C]-Cimbi-36 binding and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale Post-hoc 11
In post-hoc analyses, we evaluated the associations between pre-drug [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND in the frontolimbic brain regions (total frontal cortex and right and left amygdala and ACC) and MAAS score. Covariates and procedures for reporting effects for the models were identical to those presented in section “Pre-drug neocortical [11C]-Cimbi-36 binding and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale.”
Statistical significance and effect size
For Hypothesis 1, we conducted two significance tests: one with (n = 46) and one without the 10 participants from our previous study (n = 36) (Madsen et al., 2020), to demonstrate an independent replication. Cohen’s d is reported as an expression of standardized effect size (Cohen, 1988) for Hypothesis 1. The threshold for statistical significance for Hypothesis 1, 2 and 3 was p < 0.05. For the post-hoc analyses, p-values were corrected for multiple tests using the Bonferroni method; four tests for the post-hoc analyses regarding the MEQ subscales, and five tests for the post-hoc analyses regarding pre-drug [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND in frontolimbic regions. For post-hoc analyses, p-values are reported both uncorrected (punc) and with a family-wise error rate correction (pFWER) using a statistical threshold of pFWER < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical software R (v4.0.5).
Results
Participant characteristics and descriptive statistics
Participant characteristics and descriptive data are summarized in Table 1. Previous psychedelic use covers prior experience with 5-HT2AR agonistic psychedelics. A figure graphically displaying the change in each MAAS item score from baseline to 3-month follow-up can be found in Supplementary Figure 1.
| Variables | Mean ± SD | Median | Range: min, max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions= 46n | |||
| Sex (% female) | 37 | ||
| Previous psychedelic use (% yes) | 37 | ||
| Age (years) | 32.6 ± 8.69 | 29.8 | 24.2, 60.2 |
| BMI (kg/m) 2 1 | 24.5 ± 3.09 | 23.8 | 18.8, 33.2 |
| Weight-adjusted psilocybin dose (mg/kg) | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.15, 0.32 |
| Actual psilocybin dose (mg) | 20.2 ± 4.36 | 21 | 12, 30 |
| Time from psilocybin intervention to follow-up MAAS score (months) | 3.21 ± 0.55 | 3.1 | 2.55, 5.35 |
| Baseline MAAS score | 4.14 ± 0.6 | 4.2 | 2.33, 5.13 |
| Neocortical [C]-Cimbi-36 BP 11 ND 1 | 1.21 ± 0.220 | 1.17 | 0.870, 2.02 |
Changes in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale following psilocybin administration
We found a significant increase in average MAAS score from baseline to 3-month follow-up, both in the full sample (n = 46) (Cohen’s d: 0.72; mean% change [95%CI]: 8.1 [5.1;11.1]; p = 3.24 × 10–6, Figure 1) and in the independent sample (n = 36) (Cohen’s d: 0.71; mean% change [95%CI]: 7.5 [4.0;10.9]; p = 1.0 × 10–4). A graphical display of relation between baseline MAAS and change in MAAS is illustrated in Supplementary Figure 2.
Change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) score following psilocybin administration from baseline to 3-month follow-up in the full sample (= 46). Colored lines: Individual values; middle black dot: mean; error bar: SD. No participants had a total MAAS score <2. Maximum possible MAAS score = 6. n
Mystical Experience Questionnaire and change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale
MEQ total score was significantly positively associated with change in MAAS score (% mean change per unit increase in MEQ [95%CI]: 3.1 [0.04; 6.0]; p = 0.035, Figure 2).
Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) total score association with percentage change in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS). Black line and gray shading: Estimated regression line and 95% confidence interval. Colored circles: Individual participants. No participants had an MEQ score ≤1.
: Mystical Experience Questionnaire subscales and changes in Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale Post-hoc
Post-hoc analyses revealed a statistically significant positive association between change in MAAS score and the MEQ subscale mystical (% mean change per unit increase in mystical [95%CI]: 2.93 [0.75; 5.11]; punc = 0.012, pFWER = 0.049). No other significant associations between change in MAAS score and MEQ subscales were observed after correction for multiple testing (positive mood: 3.40 [0.67; 6.13]; punc = 0.019, pFWER = 0.076, transcendence of time and space: 0.48 [−2.57; 3.57]; punc = 0.75, pFWER = 3 and ineffability: −0.13 [−3.01; 2.76]; punc = 0.93, pFWER = 3.72).
Pre-drug neocortical [C]-Cimbi-36 BPand Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale 11 ND
The linear regression model showed a negative but not significant association between pre-drug neocortical [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND and MAAS score (β [95%CI], R2: −0.55 [−1.48; 0.38], 0.0051; p = 0.24).
: Pre-drug frontolimbic [C]-Cimbi-36 BPand Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale Post-hoc 11 ND
Post-hoc analyses revealed a significant negative association between pre-drug right amygdala [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND and MAAS score (β [95%CI], R2: −0.67 [–1.06; −0.28], 0.30; punc = 0.0016, pFWER = 0.008, Figure 3). No other significant associations between [11C]-Cimbi-36 BPND in frontolimbic regions and MAAS score were observed after correction for multiple testing (frontal cortex: −0.48 [−1.35; 0.38], 0.00015; punc = 0.26, pFWER = 1.3), right ACC: −0.19 [−1.54; 0.17], −0.0047; punc = 0.29, pFWER = 1.45, left ACC: −0.31 [−0.90; −0.28], – 0.0056; punc = 0.30, pFWER = 1.5 and left amygdala: (−0.14 [−1.71; −0.89], −0.05; punc = 0.78, pFWER = 3.9).
Pre-drug right amygdala [C]-Cimbi-36 BPassociation with Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) score. Black line and gray shading: Estimated regression line and 95% confidence interval. Colored circles: Individual participants. No participants had a MAAS score <2 or >5. Maximum possible MAAS score = 6. 11 ND
Discussion
We here demonstrate that psilocybin induces a significant increase in trait mindfulness of 8.1% from baseline to 3-month follow-up across 46 psilocybin sessions. As a novel finding, we show that participants who experienced a greater mystical-type experience exhibited a significantly greater increase in trait mindfulness at 3-month follow-up. We found no significant association between pre-drug neocortical 5-HT2AR binding and trait mindfulness; however, post-hoc analyses of frontolimbic brain regions revealed a significant negative association between pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding in the right amygdala and trait mindfulness.
The observed increase in trait mindfulness replicates and strengthens the results of our previous study, where psilocybin increased trait mindfulness for at least 3 months in 10 healthy volunteers (Madsen et al., 2020). These findings align with previous studies of psychedelic-induced mindfulness in healthy volunteers. Buddhist meditation practitioners show increased trait mindfulness the day after psilocybin compared to placebo (Smigielski et al., 2019a), and ayahuasca intake is associated with increased mindfulness 24 h after administration (Soler et al., 2016; Uthaug et al., 2018). More sustained effects have only been studied after 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) intake where trait mindfulness was higher 1 month after intake (Uthaug et al., 2019). Taken together, there is a growing amount of evidence suggesting that psychedelic substances promote an immediate and sustained increase in trait mindfulness in healthy individuals.
Although trait mindfulness is considered a stable human disposition, it can be enhanced through meditation and mindfulness-practice (Smigielski et al., 2019a). Our findings of sustained and increased trait mindfulness following psilocybin administration can be interpreted in relation to a previous mindfulness-intervention, where healthy individuals participated in an 8-week intensive MBSR course and on average experienced a 7% increase in trait mindfulness, compared to 1–3% in the inactive control groups (Jensen et al., 2012), indicating a significant increase following MBSR training. Another MBSR study reported a sustained 8% increase in trait mindfulness over 12-months in the treatment group, compared to the control group where both increases and decreases in trait mindfulness were reported, fluctuating up to 7% in each direction (Shapiro et al., 2011). These results suggest that trait mindfulness naturally fluctuates over time, but on average at a lower magnitude and without a clear pattern compared to what is observed following MBSR treatment and psilocybin intervention, the latter as suggested by the results from the current study.
Our findings support a positive association between the intensity of the mystical-type experience and increases in trait mindfulness, echoing previous studies that have attested to the importance of the mystical-type experience for lasting positive psychological effects of psilocybin (Pahnke, 1963; Maclean et al., 2011; Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Griffiths et al., 2016, 2018; Ross et al., 2016; Roseman et al., 2018; Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019; Smigielski et al., 2019a; McCulloch et al., 2022). In self-reported psilocybin accounts, healthy participants who have had a complete mystical-type experience (>60% on all subscales of the MEQ) describe feeling a universal bond, witnessing profound beauty and a great love for family (McCulloch et al., 2022). These themes of connectedness, bliss and unity with all things are also recounted in mindfulness practice, such as meditation (Hölzel and Ott, 2006; Barrett and Griffiths, 2018). Other notable parallels with meditation include the experience of ego-dissolution (Millière, 2017; Barrett and Griffiths, 2018; Millière et al., 2018) along with neurobiological similarities, such as reduced network integrity in the default mode network (Brewer et al., 2011; Carhart-Harris et al., 2014; Fox et al., 2016; Barrett and Griffiths, 2018). Furthermore, it has recently been demonstrated that both trait mindfulness and mystical-type experiences are associated with greater mental wellbeing, and that specifically psilocybin-induced mystical-type experiences alongside a mindfulness practice are associated with higher mindfulness and greater mental wellbeing (Qiu and Minda, 2022). It is possible that the subjective experience of merging with a “oneness” of all things together with a diminished focus on ego, at least when combined with a blissful or ecstatic emotional tone, allows for a shift in perspective that is conducive for psychological flexibility and mindful living. This is further supported by our post hoc finding of a significant positive association between the MEQ subscale “mystical” and change in trait mindfulness. Based on these initial findings, we encourage future research to study the possible complimentary effects of mindfulness-practice and psilocybin in clinical populations, as it may be a suitable therapeutic framework to maintain positive psychological effects of psilocybin treatment. It is also conceivable that intervention with psilocybin could be used to address barriers to MBI and potentially assist individuals who struggle with engagement in therapy.
In post-hoc analyses, we found a significant negative association between pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding in the right amygdala and trait mindfulness. There is some pre-clinical evidence to suggest an inverse coupling between available serotonin in the brain and 5-HT2AR binding (Jørgensen et al., 2018), further supported by the downregulation of 5-HT2AR binding following administration of serotonergic antidepressants (Sanders-Bush et al., 1989; Gray and Roth, 2001; Günther et al., 2009), also seen in depressed patients (Yatham et al., 1999). As such, it is possible that lower 5-HT2AR binding in the right amygdala reflects increased serotonin, and that this is coupled to higher trait mindfulness. However, interpretation of this finding should be made with caution, as the time-activity curve fit for amygdala is typically noisy (Finnema et al., 2014), and we observed no other significant associations for neocortex or frontolimbic regions, including the left amygdala. Interestingly, fMRI studies support involvement of the right amygdala in mindful states (Farb et al., 2007) and trait mindfulness (Way et al., 2010), suggesting that the right amygdala may be more involved in mindfulness than the left amygdala. Future studies are needed to replicate the observed association between right amygdala 5-HT2AR binding and trait mindfulness, and further explore the role of serotonin for individual differences in response to psychedelic administration.
Limitations
Our findings should be interpreted in light of the following limitations: Since we did not collect data in the time that elapsed between psilocybin intervention and 3-months follow-up, we cannot determine whether follow-up MAAS scores were affected by other life circumstances during this time period. Furthermore, although MAAS has shown high test-retest reliability and is a stable personality trait measure of mindfulness (Brown and Ryan, 2003; Jensen et al., 2016), this study is limited by its open-label design and not having a blinded control group (see Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2021 for discussion).
Conclusion
We demonstrate that trait mindfulness is increased in healthy volunteers at least 3 months following a single psilocybin intervention and that the self-reported mystical-type experience immediately following the psychedelic experience is positively associated with this lasting increase in trait mindfulness. We also show a negative association between pre-drug 5-HT2AR binding in the right amygdala and trait mindfulness. These findings suggest that psilocybin and the mystical-type experience could have mindfulness-enhancing capacities, and may potentially work in synergy with mindfulness-based forms of therapies in a clinical setting.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, data in the Cimbi database can be accessed by application (http://www.cimbi.dk/db↗). Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Peter S. Jensen, http://www.cimbi.dk/db↗.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT ID: 2016-004000-61, amendments: 2017014166, 2017082837, and 2018023295); and the Ethics Committee for the Capital Region of Copenhagen (journal ID: H-16028698, with amendments 56023, 56967, 57974, 59673, 60437, 62255, 74340, and 79042). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
AS collected the data, performed analyses, and wrote the manuscript. MM collected the data and provided feedback on the manuscript. BO provided statistical consultation. SA collected the data, assisted with the psilocybin interventions, and provided feedback on the manuscript. GK conceptualized the study, supervised the data collection, and provided feedback on the manuscript. PF collected the data, supervised the data collection, and provided feedback on the manuscript. DS conceptualized the study, assisted with the psilocybin interventions, and supervised the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We extend our sincere gratitude to Peter Jensen, Dorthe Givard, Drummond McCulloch, Lone Freyr, Agnete Dyssegaard, Josephine Torp, Gerda Thomsen, Svitlana Olsen, Annette Johansen, Catharina Messel, and Maria Zofia Grzywacz for help in various aspects of data collection and analysis. We are grateful to the University of Chemistry and Technology and the National Institute of Mental Health (Prague, Czechia) for production of psilocybin and Glostrup Apotek (Glostrup, Denmark) for encapsulation. We are grateful to The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation for the donation of the Cyclotron and PET scanner.
Funding
Data collected in the present manuscript was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark (Grant Number 4108-00004B), Independent Research Fund Denmark (Grant Numbers 6110-00518B and 9058-00017B), and The Ester M. og Konrad Kristian Sigurdssons Dyreværns Foundation (Grant Number 850-22-55166-17-LNG). AS was supported through a stipend from The Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant Number NNF20OC0066082). MM was supported through a stipend from Rigshospitalet’s Research Council (Grant Number R130-A5324). BO was supported by The Lundbeck Foundation (Grant Number R231-2016-3236) and Marie-Curie-NEUROMODEL (Grant Number 746850).
Conflict of interest
MM has received an honorarium as a speaker for Lundbeck Pharma and the Lundbeck Foundation. DS has received an honorarium as a speaker for the Lundbeck Foundation. GK has received honoraria as a consultant for Sanos and as a speaker for Sage-Biogen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer SL declared a shared parent affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at the time of review.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948729/full#supplementary-material↗
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, data in the Cimbi database can be accessed by application (http://www.cimbi.dk/db↗). Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Peter S. Jensen, http://www.cimbi.dk/db↗.