Full text is available at the source.
Surprising patterns in fruit fly daily activity rhythms in natural environments
Updated
Abstract
Several key laboratory-based assumptions about fly circadian behavior are not supported by natural observations.
- Flies do not consistently anticipate light transitions in their natural environment.
- The midday 'siesta' behavior observed in the lab is not evident in the wild.
- Crepuscular activity and nocturnal behavior under moonlight differ from laboratory findings.
- Temperature stimuli may have a more significant role than light stimuli in influencing fly behavior.
- A third locomotor component, termed 'A' (afternoon), was identified in addition to the morning and evening oscillators.
- Natural rhythm phenotypes can be replicated in the lab using realistic temperature and light cycle simulations.
Simplified