Trials

Using biofeedback and electrical nerve stimulation to treat bowel problems after lower rectal surgery: a plan for a randomized trial

Updated

Abstract

A total of 242 participants with (LARS) will be enrolled in a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a combined treatment approach.

  • LARS affects approximately 25-80% of patients post-rectal cancer surgery, leading to significant bowel dysfunction.
  • Biofeedback therapy has shown limited success in improving rectal control in these patients.
  • Stimulating the pudendal perineal nerves may provide greater benefits for pelvic floor muscle function than biofeedback alone.
  • The primary outcome of the study is the LARS score, with secondary outcomes including anorectal manometry and quality of life measurements.
  • Participants will undergo 20 treatment sessions over 4 weeks, with evaluations at baseline, 1 month post-intervention, and 6 months follow-up.

Simplified

Key numbers

242
Participant Count
Total number of participants in the trial.
25%
Improvement Rate Threshold
Minimum improvement rate for treatment efficacy.

Full Text

What this is

  • This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of combined biofeedback and percutaneous electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (B-PEPNS) for ().
  • affects 25-80% of rectal cancer surgery patients, causing debilitating bowel dysfunction.
  • The trial will enroll 242 participants, comparing outcomes between B-PEPNS and biofeedback alone over a treatment period of 4 weeks.

Essence

  • The study aims to assess whether B-PEPNS combined with biofeedback can more effectively alleviate symptoms compared to biofeedback alone, potentially improving patients' quality of life after rectal cancer surgery.

Key takeaways

  • is a common complication after rectal cancer surgery, leading to significant bowel dysfunction. Current treatments have limitations, necessitating new approaches like B-PEPNS.
  • The trial will measure primary outcomes using the score, with secondary outcomes including anorectal manometry and quality of life assessments via the EORTC QLQ-CR29.
  • The study is designed to provide evidence on the effectiveness of a non-surgical treatment option for , potentially offering a new standard of care.

Caveats

  • Limitations include potential variability in participant adherence and the inability to blind participants and therapists, which may introduce bias.
  • The absence of long-term follow-up data may limit insights into the sustained effects of the intervention.

Definitions

  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A condition affecting bowel function after rectal surgery, characterized by fecal incontinence, urgency, and increased bowel frequency.

Simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free