Regenerative biomaterials

Calcium silicate promotes bone stem cell energy changes that support bone formation and healing

Updated

Abstract

Essence

Calcium silicate promoted osteogenesis and bone regeneration by shifting BMSCs toward through .

Evidence

This preclinical hBMSC and bone-regeneration study found that calcium silicate, mainly via silicon ion release, increased mitophagy, autophagic flux, mitochondrial fusion, and oxidative phosphorylation, and that blocking oxidative phosphorylation hindered the osteogenic and regenerative effects.

Caveat

The mechanism and benefits were shown in hBMSCs and preclinical bone-regeneration experiments, not in human clinical bone healing.

Simplified

Key numbers

105.7 mg/L
Si Ion Concentration
Concentration of Si ions in extracts compared to α-MEM.
26.14 ± 1.37%
Bone Volume Fraction Increase
BV/TV in -treated vs. control group.
171.3 mg/L
Ca Ion Concentration
Concentration of Ca ions in extracts compared to α-MEM.

Key figures

Figure 1.
extract effects on osteogenic markers, proliferation, and differentiation in human BMSCs
Highlights increased osteogenic marker expression and proliferation in treated with CS extract during differentiation
rbaf101f1
  • Panel A
    Flow cytometry showing percentages of hBMSCs positive for CD73, CD90, CD105 (around 94-95%), and low positivity for CD34 and CD45 (around 0.5%)
  • Panel B
    Proliferation of hBMSCs measured by CCK-8 assay over 3 days with various CS extract dilutions; 25% CS shows significantly higher proliferation than control at days 2 and 3
  • Panel C
    at 7 days and at 14 days post-osteogenic induction; CS+ group appears visibly more stained than Control+OM and Control groups
  • Panel D
    Relative mRNA levels of osteogenic markers , , , and at 7 days; CS+OM group shows significantly higher expression than Control and Control+OM groups
  • Panel E
    Immunofluorescence staining of and ALP at 4 days post-osteogenic induction; CS+OM group appears to have stronger red fluorescence signal than Control+OM group
Figure 2.
Control vs -treated : mitochondrial respiration and metabolite changes.
Highlights increased mitochondrial respiration and metabolic shifts toward in CS-treated hBMSCs.
rbaf101f2
  • Panel A
    Oxygen consumption rate () over time with sequential injections of Oligomycin (Oligo), FCCP, and rotenone plus antimycin A (Rot/AA); CS-treated cells appear to have higher OCR than control.
  • Panel B
    Quantified OCR parameters showing basal respiration, ATP production, and maximal respiratory capacity are significantly higher in CS-treated hBMSCs; spare respiratory capacity shows an increase but is not statistically marked.
  • Panel C
    Principal component analysis () of metabolomics data showing distinct clustering of control and CS-treated hBMSCs.
  • Panel D
    Metabolite set enrichment analysis () highlighting pathways with significant changes, including pyruvate metabolism, transfer of acetyl groups into mitochondria, and the .
  • Panel E
    Heatmap of the 50 most significantly affected metabolites showing clear differences in abundance between control and CS-treated hBMSCs.
  • Panel F
    Bar graphs showing peak areas of citric acid cycle metabolites citric acid and L-malic acid, both significantly increased in CS-treated hBMSCs.
Figure 3.
Control vs -treated : mitochondrial morphology, gene expression, dysfunction, and reactive oxygen species levels
Highlights longer mitochondria and reduced mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS in CS-treated hBMSCs versus control cells.
rbaf101f3
  • Panel A
    Mitochondria labeled with anti- antibody show visibly longer mitochondria in CS-treated hBMSCs compared to control; mean mitochondrial length is higher in CS group.
  • Panel B
    TEM images reveal mitochondrial morphology differences between control and CS-treated hBMSCs, with CS mitochondria appearing more elongated.
  • Panel C
    Relative mRNA levels of genes (Fis1, Mtp18) are lower, and fusion genes (Mfn1, Mfn2) are higher in CS-treated hBMSCs compared to control.
  • Panel D
    Flow cytometry with and Red probes shows a lower proportion of dysfunctional mitochondria (MitoTracker Green+Red−) in CS-treated hBMSCs than control.
  • Panel E
    MitoTracker Green and labeling indicates fewer hBMSCs producing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species () in CS-treated group versus control.
  • Panel F
    Quantification of MitoSOX fluorescence intensity shows reduced mtROS levels in CS-treated hBMSCs compared to control.
Figure 4.
Control vs -treated : and markers and localization.
Highlights increased mitophagy and autophagic flux in CS-treated hBMSCs, spotlighting enhanced cellular recycling activity.
rbaf101f4
  • Panel A
    Colocalization of mitochondrial marker (green) and lysosomal marker (red) in control and CS-treated hBMSCs, with visibly higher colocalization in CS-treated cells.
  • Panel B
    Western blot analysis of and levels in control, CS, , and CS+BafA1 treated hBMSCs, showing increased LC3-II and decreased p62 in CS-treated cells compared to control.
  • Panel C
    Fluorescence images of hBMSCs transfected with showing autophagic flux; CS-treated cells have significantly more total LC3 puncta and red puncta (autolysosomes) than control.
Figure 5.
Control vs vs CS+: mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, osteogenic markers, and metabolism in
Highlights how CS enhances mitochondrial function and osteogenic markers while BafA1 reverses these effects in hBMSCs.
rbaf101f5
  • Panel A
    Flow cytometry plots and quantification of dysfunctional mitochondria percentage using and Red probes; CS group shows reduced dysfunctional mitochondria compared to control, while CS+BafA1 group shows increased percentage.
  • Panel B
    fluorescence intensity measuring mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (); CS group has lower mtROS levels than control, CS+BafA1 group shows increased mtROS.
  • Panel C
    and at 7 and 14 days post-osteogenic induction; CS group shows stronger staining indicating osteogenic activity, CS+BafA1 group shows reduced staining.
  • Panel D
    Basal oxygen consumption rate () indicating activity; CS group has higher OCR than control, CS+BafA1 group shows reduced OCR.
  • Panel E
    Relative mRNA levels of osteogenic markers , , ALP, and at 7 days post-induction; CS group shows increased expression, CS+BafA1 group shows decreased expression compared to CS.
  • Panel F
    Immunofluorescence staining of and ALP proteins with actin and DAPI counterstaining at 4 days post-induction; CS group shows visibly stronger OPN and ALP signals compared to control, CS+BafA1 group shows reduced signals.
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • Calcium silicate (CS) bioactive materials enhance bone regeneration by promoting the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).
  • CS stimulates mitochondrial () in human BMSCs, leading to metabolic shifts that support osteogenesis.
  • The study investigates the mechanisms by which CS induces , eliminates dysfunctional mitochondria, and enhances mitochondrial function, thereby facilitating bone regeneration.

Essence

  • Calcium silicate enhances the osteogenic differentiation of human BMSCs through increased mitochondrial , driven by that improves mitochondrial health.

Key takeaways

  • CS treatment significantly increased the levels of silicon (Si) ions to 105.7 mg/L and calcium (Ca) ions to 171.3 mg/L, promoting osteogenic differentiation in hBMSCs.
  • CS-treated hBMSCs exhibited enhanced activity, with greater basal respiration and ATP generation compared to control cells, indicating a metabolic shift essential for osteogenesis.
  • In vivo studies demonstrated that CS-induced hBMSCs led to a bone volume fraction (BV/TV) of 26.14 ± 1.37%, significantly greater than the control group's 16.66 ± 1.83%, confirming improved bone repair capacity.

Caveats

  • The study primarily focuses on in vitro and animal models, which may not fully replicate human physiological conditions, limiting the immediate clinical applicability of the findings.
  • The precise molecular mechanisms linking CS treatment to enhanced and require further investigation to clarify the underlying pathways involved.

Definitions

  • mitophagy: A specialized form of autophagy that selectively degrades dysfunctional mitochondria to maintain cellular health.
  • oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS): A metabolic pathway that uses oxygen to produce ATP, the energy currency of the cell, through the electron transport chain in mitochondria.

Simplified

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free