BACKGROUND: Obesity leads to both heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and to chronic kidney disease (CKD); CKD may both influence the clinical course of obesity-related HFpEF; and incretin-based drugs may influence renal function.
OBJECTIVES: This analysis had dual objectives: 1) to evaluate the influence of CKD on the clinical responses to tirzepatide in patients with obesity-related HFpEF; and 2) to investigate the complexity of tirzepatide-related changes in renal function. For both objectives, we focused on discrepancies between creatinine-based and cystatin C-based estimates of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
METHODS: The SUMMIT trial randomly assigned 731 patients with HFpEF and a body mass index ≥30 kg/m, who were enriched for participants with CKD. Patients received either placebo or tirzepatide for a median of 104 weeks and were followed for cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events and for changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) after 52 weeks. Because of the confounding produced by obesity and changes in muscle mass, eGFR was assessed at randomization and after 12, 24, and 52 weeks by both creatinine-based and cystatin C-based formulae. 2
RESULTS: Patients with CKD (based on creatinine or cystatin C) had greater severity of heart failure, as reflected by: 1) worse functional class, KCCQ-CSS scores, and 6-minute walk distance; 2) higher levels of NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T; and 3) a 2-fold increase in the risk of worsening heart failure events. CKD did not influence the effect of tirzepatide to reduce the relative risk of major adverse heart failure events and to improve KCCQ-CSS, quality of life, and functional capacity, but the absolute risk reduction in the primary events was numerically greater in patients with CKD. Regarding renal function assessments, baseline eGFR-cystatin C was consistently ≈9 mL/min/1.73 mlower than that eGFR-creatinine, with significant individual variance. Furthermore, tirzepatide increased eGFR at 52 weeks, assessed by both creatinine-based and cystatin C-based formulae, but with considerable discordance in individual patients. Tirzepatide produced a decline in eGFR at 12 weeks with eGFR-creatinine (but not eGFR-cystatin C), and it led to an improvement in eGFR at 52 weeks in all patients (when assessed by cystatin C), but only in patients with CKD (when assessed by eGFR-creatinine). 2
CONCLUSIONS: The triad of obesity, HFpEF, and CKD identifies patients with considerable functional impairment and an unfavorable prognosis, who nevertheless respond favorably to tirzepatide. Long-term tirzepatide improves renal function (both by cystatin C and creatinine), but the measurement of eGFR in patients with obesity receiving incretin-based drugs is likely to be skewed by the effects of fat and muscle mass (and by changes in body composition) on the synthesis of both cystatin C and creatinine. (A Study of Tirzepatide [LY3298176] in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [HFpEF] and Obesity: The SUMMIT Trial; NCT04847557).
