What this is
- The kidney matrix is a dynamic structure that undergoes circadian remodelling influenced by molecular clocks.
- This review synthesizes recent findings on how regulate kidney matrix components, particularly in glomeruli.
- Disruption of these rhythms can lead to kidney disease progression, highlighting the importance of temporal biology in kidney health.
Essence
- play a crucial role in regulating kidney matrix dynamics, particularly in the glomerulus. Disruption of these rhythms contributes to kidney disease progression, suggesting that understanding these mechanisms could lead to new therapeutic strategies.
Key takeaways
- Circadian clocks in the kidney coordinate matrix remodelling, influencing glomerular filtration and repair processes.
- Disruption of , due to factors like shift work, can lead to kidney dysfunction and disease progression.
- Therapeutic strategies, including chronotherapy, may optimize treatment timing to align with for improved kidney health.
Caveats
- The review primarily synthesizes existing studies, which may limit the depth of empirical data presented.
- The implications of circadian disruption on kidney health are complex and may vary across different populations and conditions.
Definitions
- Circadian rhythms: Intrinsic 24-hour oscillations that synchronize physiological processes with environmental cycles.
- Kidney matrisome: The dynamic extracellular matrix of the kidney that supports structure and function, undergoing continuous remodelling.
AI simplified
Introduction
The physiological functions of the kidney, including glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption, solute transport, and urinary excretion, exhibit strong circadian patterns that align with the body’s rest-activity cycle [1–3]. These rhythms are regulated by molecular clocks involving core clock genes including brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1 (BMAL1), circadian locomotor output cycles kaput (CLOCK), Period proteins (PER), and Cryptochrome proteins (CRY) within kidney cells [4–6]. While circadian regulation of kidney function has become increasingly recognised, recent evidence indicates that these molecular clocks also direct the timing of matrix remodelling [7–9]. This introduces a new conceptual framework where the kidney matrisome is not only dynamic, but also temporally coordinated, to match the physiological and regenerative demands of the kidneys [1]. Understanding how circadian clocks regulate kidney matrix components, remodelling, and repair processes could uncover new insights into kidney disease progression and therapeutic targets. This review summarises emerging studies linking circadian regulation to glomerular matrix dynamics, including rhythmic gene expression in podocytes and the basement membrane, the role of glucocorticoids (GCs) in clock entrainment, and interactions between matrix stiffness and cellular clocks. It also explores the mechanisms and possible therapies, such as chronotherapy and treatments targeting the clock.
Kidney Matrisome Dynamics and Circadian Rhythm
The kidney matrix is regionally specialised across nephron segments and the interstitium (Fig. 1a). The initial segment of the nephron is the glomerulus, a spherical bundle of fenestrated capillaries which collectively function as a complex sieve, selectively filtering blood across the glomerular filtration barrier. These highly specialised filters are of particular importance clinically, given that most cases of chronic kidney disease (CKD) occur secondary to glomerular pathology [10]. The filtration barrier is comprised of three interacting layers: the inner fenestrated endothelial cells, a middle protein mesh that forms the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and an outer visceral podocyte layer (Fig. 1b). The GBM is a highly organised meshwork of type IV collagen heterotrimers (α3–α4–α5), along with laminins (mainly α5β2γ1), nidogens, and heparan sulphate proteoglycans [11]. Pathogenic variants in COL4A3, COL4A4, or COL4A5 cause Alport syndrome, the most common monogenic cause of kidney disease in childhood [12, 13]. The mesangial matrix, enriched in type IV, V, and VI collagens and fibronectin, surrounds glomeruli and reinforces the capillary tuft [10, 14].
Along the nephron tubules, segment-specific epithelial basement membranes, composed of unique collagen IV and laminin isoforms, support both reabsorptive and secretory functions [19, 20]. These are encased by the interstitial matrix, particularly abundant in the cortex and medulla, which contains fibrillar collagens I and III, elastin, fibronectin, and matricellular proteins. This compartment also harbours fibroblasts and immune cells, serving as a signalling hub for matrix remodelling [21]. Enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors, dynamically regulate matrix turnover in response to both physiological and pathological stimuli [22]. Together, the GBM, tubular basement membranes, and interstitium form a spatially defined kidney matrisome that preserves architecture, adapts to stress, and is temporally regulated by circadian clock genes, which coordinate anabolic and catabolic activities [2, 15, 23, 24].
![Click to view full size Overview of matrix compartments in a healthy and diseased glomerulus.The schematic illustrates the major matrix domains of the glomerulus: the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), the endothelial glycocalyx, and the mesangial matrix. The GBM is a trilaminar scaffold situated between fenestrated endothelium and podocytes. It is composed of type IV collagen (α3–α4–α5), laminin-521, nidogens, and heparan sulphate proteoglycans such as perlecan, forming a cross-linked structure essential for anchorage and permselectivity. The endothelial glycocalyx covers the luminal surface and contains proteoglycans (syndecans and glypicans), glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulphate and hyaluronan), and matrix-associated proteins such as versican that contribute to charge selectivity and mechanosensation. The mesangial matrix, generated by mesangial cells, comprises collagens IV/V/VI, fibronectin, and hyaluronan and provides structural support while mediating mechanotransduction. This is influenced by circadian cues (). In healthy mice, the GBM exhibits circadian oscillations in its composition and ultrastructure, appearing thicker and more continuous during the inactive (light) phase and physiologically thinner during the active (dark) phase in parallel with rhythmic expression of remodelling enzymes including metalloproteinases and heparinase []. These reversible day-night changes reflect temporally regulated matrix turnover that maintains barrier function. Circadian disruption or inflammatory injury abolishes this rhythmic organisation. It leads to pathological matrix remodelling, including degradation of GBM components, disorganised collagen deposition, and reduced podocyte proteins such as nephrin and podocin. This ultimately impairs the integrity of the filtration barrier [–]. Created with. a b [15] [16] [18] BioRender.com](https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC12975147/bin/nef-2026-0000-0000-550773_F01.jpg.jpg)
Overview of matrix compartments in a healthy and diseased glomerulus.The schematic illustrates the major matrix domains of the glomerulus: the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), the endothelial glycocalyx, and the mesangial matrix. The GBM is a trilaminar scaffold situated between fenestrated endothelium and podocytes. It is composed of type IV collagen (α3–α4–α5), laminin-521, nidogens, and heparan sulphate proteoglycans such as perlecan, forming a cross-linked structure essential for anchorage and permselectivity. The endothelial glycocalyx covers the luminal surface and contains proteoglycans (syndecans and glypicans), glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulphate and hyaluronan), and matrix-associated proteins such as versican that contribute to charge selectivity and mechanosensation. The mesangial matrix, generated by mesangial cells, comprises collagens IV/V/VI, fibronectin, and hyaluronan and provides structural support while mediating mechanotransduction. This is influenced by circadian cues (). In healthy mice, the GBM exhibits circadian oscillations in its composition and ultrastructure, appearing thicker and more continuous during the inactive (light) phase and physiologically thinner during the active (dark) phase in parallel with rhythmic expression of remodelling enzymes including metalloproteinases and heparinase []. These reversible day-night changes reflect temporally regulated matrix turnover that maintains barrier function. Circadian disruption or inflammatory injury abolishes this rhythmic organisation. It leads to pathological matrix remodelling, including degradation of GBM components, disorganised collagen deposition, and reduced podocyte proteins such as nephrin and podocin. This ultimately impairs the integrity of the filtration barrier [–]. Created with. a b [15] [16] [18] BioRender.com
The Molecular Architecture of Circadian Clocks
Mammalian circadian rhythms are intrinsic 24-h oscillations that synchronise cellular and physiological processes with environmental cycles (Fig. 2). These rhythms are organised by a hierarchical network of central and peripheral clocks, with the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus serving as the master pacemaker [25, 26]. Peripheral clocks, present in nearly all tissues, including the kidney, are entrained by central cues and local signals such as feeding, hormones, and temperature [27]. At the cellular level, circadian timing arises from a core transcription translation feedback loop. In the primary loop, the proteins CLOCK and BMAL1 form a heterodimer that binds to specific DNA motifs known as enhancer box elements to activate transcription of the Per1–3 genes and Cry1 and Cry2 genes. As PER and CRY proteins accumulate, they move into the nucleus and inhibit CLOCK:BMAL1 activity, completing the negative feedback cycle. A second regulatory loop stabilises this system: the nuclear receptors REV-ERB and ROR repress or activate Bmal1 transcription by binding to response elements in its promoter, thereby shaping rhythm amplitude and phase [28]. Post-translational processes provide additional control, as casein kinases and phosphatases regulate PER and CRY phosphorylation, degradation and nuclear entry, ensuring accurate ∼24-h oscillations [29–31]. Together, these coupled loops generate rhythmic expression of large gene networks across tissues.

The mammalian circadian system. Light entrains the master circadian pacemaker in the SCN, which synchronises peripheral clocks, including those in the kidney, intestine, lung and liver. Peripheral oscillators also integrate non-photic zeitgebers such as meal timing, physical activity, temperature changes, and rhythmic GC signals. At the molecular level, circadian timing arises from interlinked transcriptional-translational feedback loops. CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimers bind E-box elements to activate Per and Cry transcription and to induce clock-controlled genes, including the D-box activators DBP, HLF, and TEF. PER and CRY proteins are phosphorylated by casein kinase-1 delta and epsilon, undergo regulated degradation, and then return to the nucleus, where they inhibit CLOCK-BMAL1, thereby closing the core loop. A stabilising loop is formed by REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptors, which compete for RREs in promoters such as Bmal1 to repress or activate transcription and thereby set phase and amplitude. NFIL3 (E4BP4) binds D-box motifs to oppose DBP/HLF/TEF activity, refining rhythmic output. Together, these interconnected loops integrate photic and systemic cues to align central and peripheral clocks and coordinate circadian programmes across tissues. SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus; GC, glucocorticoid; BMAL1, brain and muscle ARNT-like protein 1; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; PER, Period proteins; CRY, Cryptochrome proteins; CK1δ/ε, casein kinase 1 delta/epsilon; DBP, D-box binding protein; HLF, hepatic leukaemia factor; TEF, thyrotroph embryonic factor; NFIL3, nuclear factor interleukin-3 regulated; REV-ERB, NR1D nuclear receptors; ROR, retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptors; CCGs, clock-controlled genes; E-box, enhancer box; RRE, ROR response element; D-box, daytime element. Created with. BioRender.com
Evidence for Glomerular Clocks in Circadian Matrix Regulation
Intrinsic circadian timing in the glomerulus has been demonstrated using Per2 reporter mice, in which isolated glomeruli maintain robust, self-sustained oscillations, independent of systemic cues [15, 32]. Transcriptomic profiling across a 24-h cycle revealed a glomerular circadian transcriptome comprising 375 rhythmic genes enriched for extracellular matrix organisation, integrin-mediated adhesion and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signalling [15]. Within this set, a discrete group of matrix-related transcripts shows strong rhythmicity, including regulators of basement membrane assembly and turnover such as Adamts4, Loxl4, and Mmp14 [15]. Proteomic analysis confirms that these transcriptional rhythms translate to dynamic changes in basement membrane composition [15]. Notably, peak collagen IV α3, α4, and α5 chains abundance occurred during the rest phase (Fig. 3a), temporally aligned with increased basement membrane thickness observed by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1b). These data reveal a temporal cascade in which the clock drives rhythmic expression of matrix regulators, followed by oscillations in basement membrane protein abundance and measurable diurnal changes in its structure (Fig. 1b). The kidney matrisome cycles through coordinated phases of synthesis, deposition, and degradation [10, 33], and this temporal separation prevents overlap of opposing processes that promote maladaptive remodelling [34, 35]. Together, these findings position the circadian clock as a key organiser of matrix homeostasis and basement membrane turnover.
This temporal organisation of matrix turnover is reinforced at the cellular level by podocyte clocks. Podocytes, which anchor the GBM, contain functional circadian machinery, and deletion of BMAL1 in these cells disrupts ultrafiltration rhythms, alters urinary excretion and perturbs cytoskeletal and matrix transcriptional programmes [2, 16]. Clock integrity also governs the rhythmic expression of disease-relevant podocyte genes, including Nphs1, Nphs2, Ptpro, and Dgke, linking circadian timing to pathways central to filtration and susceptibility to glomerular injury [15]. Clock disruption studies reinforce this connection [2, 15]. Perturbation of the podocyte clock alters the transcriptional landscape, suppressing core clock genes and reducing the expression of disease-associated genes such as Ptpro, Dgke, and Synpo (Fig. 3b). Together, these multiomic findings suggest a coordinated mechanism in which the glomerular clock programmes time-of-day transcription of matrix regulators and structural proteins. This rhythmic control shapes basement membrane composition and influences pathways implicated in fibrosis.

Circadian and GC regulation of matrix and podocyte gene rhythmicity in the glomerulus. Summary of rhythmic genes and proteins identified from glomerular transcriptomic and kidney proteomic datasets and from dexamethasone-treated podocytes.Rhythmic matrix genes are distributed between rest and active phases, with examples of rest phase regulators (,,,,; 175 genes in total) and active phase genes involved in matrix signalling and collagen processing (,,,,; 200 genes).Rhythmic matrix proteins illustrate rest-phase enrichment of core GBM collagens (Col4a3, Col4a4, Col4a5; 87 proteins) and active-phase enrichment of adhesion-associated proteins (Tns1, Ilk, Calr; 90 proteins).Dexamethasone treatment induces rhythmic expression in podocyte genes, with rest phase disease genes such as,,,,,(277 genes) and active phase immune and injury-related genes including,,,,,,(651 genes).Schematic of clock disruption and GC resetting in podocytes. Pharmacological stabilisation of CRY proteins with KL001 dampens core clock gene rhythms and alters expression of podocyte disease genes, increasingandand reducingandtogether withand. Dexamethasone (Dex) resets the podocyte clock and restores rhythmic expression in these disease-associated genes. Molecules and structures are schematic and not to scale. GC, glucocorticoid. Created with. a b c d Adamts4 Loxl4 Mmp14 Col26a1 Mmp11 Sema7a Wnt10a Itga6 Itgb6 P4ha1 Nphs1 Ptpro Synpo Slc19a2 Adamts16 Xpo5 Dgke Thsd7a Dnase1l3 Nlrp3 Mafb Il1b Il6ra Xpo5 Synpo Ptpro Dgke Cry2 Per2 BioRender.com
Circadian Disruption and Glomerular Disease Susceptibility
Disruption of circadian timing, whether through genetic variants or environmental factors, is increasingly recognised as a contributor to kidney dysfunction (Fig. 1b). Modern behaviours such as shift work, irregular sleep, and chronic exposure to artificial light desynchronise internal clocks from external cues, impairing rhythmic gene expression and physiological processes that sustain kidney homeostasis cues [36–39].
Animal studies have demonstrated that the disruption of core clock genes, including Clock and Bmal1, alters the kidneys’ response to stress [2, 16, 24, 40]. In some settings, this reduces fibrosis, likely through antioxidant pathways such as glutathione metabolism [24]; however, such effects reflect a broader loss of physiological regulation. Environmental perturbations, including phase shifts or altered light cycles, further impair circadian control of kidney function. Even mild nocturnal light exposure disturbs excretory rhythms, blood pressure regulation, and hormonal signalling, particularly in models predisposed to hypertension or metabolic stress [38, 39, 17].
In humans, chronic circadian misalignment is most evident in night shift workers and individuals with irregular schedules. Cohort studies associate long-term night work with systemic inflammation, albuminuria, and accelerated decline in kidney function [41, 42]. These risks are compounded by fragmented sleep, poor dietary timing, and melatonin suppression [42, 43]. Although some adaptation occurs, complete physiological alignment is rarely achieved [41]. Diet also exerts a strong circadian influence on sodium excretion and blood pressure displaying predictable daily rhythms in healthy individuals [44]. These become blunted in hypertension and CKD, contributing to nocturnal hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk [45, 46]. Furthermore, high-salt or high-fat diets alter kidney clock gene expression in rodents, amplifying oxidative stress and accelerating kidney injury [47–50].
These insights highlight therapeutic opportunities to restore circadian alignment. Among these, GCs are particularly notable, as they function both as systemic circadian entrainers and as frontline therapy in glomerular disease [51, 52].
GCs in the Glomerular Clock and Matrix Regulation
GC therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for glomerular disease, although its mechanisms of action are incompletely defined [51, 52]. Beyond immunosuppression, GCs act directly on podocytes to stabilise the actin cytoskeleton, remodel the glomerular matrix, and modulate circadian signalling [53]. In cultured murine podocytes, dexamethasone protects against puromycin aminonucleoside injury by increasing polymerised actin, preserving cytoskeletal structure, and accelerating recovery [53]. These effects are mediated through activation of RhoA GTPase, which promotes actin assembly, and suppression of Rac1, which limits podocyte motility and reinforces barrier stability [54]. At the transcriptional level, podocytes express a functional GR complex. GC exposure induces canonical GR-responsive genes, such as FKBP51 and αB-crystallin, drives receptor phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, and directly regulates cytoskeletal and matrix pathways [54, 55]. Transcriptomic studies further show that GCs normalise matrix-related gene expression. In a rat model of nephrotic syndrome, both GCs and the PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone reversed dysregulation of ADAM12, COL1A1, and SERPINE1 – genes implicated in human FSGS and minimal change disease [56]. These changes were most pronounced in podocytes and mesangial cells, highlighting matrix remodelling as an early therapeutic target and suggesting shared transcriptional footprints among agents that restore glomerular homeostasis. Importantly, recent evidence links these effects to circadian regulation [15]. Podocyte disease genes implicated in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome acquired rhythmicity with GC treatment, whereas disruption of the podocyte clock altered their expression [15]. This connection reveals an interplay between the glomerular clock and GC signalling, providing new insight into GC resistance mechanisms. GCs also function as systemic circadian entrainers [15]. In podocytes, they reinforce rhythmic transcriptional programs critical for barrier integrity [15]. Matrix-derived cues further shape these rhythms: stiffness and substrate tension modulate clock gene expression via integrin-mediated adhesion and signalling pathways, including RhoA-ROCK and YAP-TAZ [57, 58]. For instance, increased stiffness enhances YAP/TAZ nuclear activity and cytoskeletal remodelling [57], while the disruption of RhoA regulators, such as ARHGAP29, alters adhesion and podocyte morphology [58]. Together, these observations suggest that GC efficacy is not solely dose-dependent but also time-dependent. Administering GCs at circadian phases that support cytoskeletal reinforcement and matrix repair may enhance therapeutic benefit, while mistimed dosing could contribute to suboptimal responses.
Implications for Kidney Disease and Chronotherapy
Circadian regulation of the kidney matrisome has direct implications for disease mechanisms and therapy. In glomerular diseases, including Alport syndrome and glomerulonephritis, progressive fibrosis and matrix accumulation drive functional decline [11, 16, 32]. Experimental and clinical studies demonstrate that circadian disruption exacerbates kidney outcomes, whereas rhythm stabilisation is protective [2, 15, 37, 59]. Aligning behaviours such as eating, sleeping, and light exposure with circadian timing may help preserve matrix balance and prevent fibrosis [45, 60, 61]. Conversely, CKD exacerbates circadian disruption through uremic toxins and inflammation, reinforcing a cycle of kidney and clock dysfunction [43, 62].
Chronotherapy offers a framework for synchronising treatment with biological rhythms [63, 64]. Matrix-related pathways peak at defined times [15], suggesting that antifibrotic therapies may be most effective when delivered during phases of fibrogenic activity [65, 66]. Clinical evidence supports this approach. That is, bedtime dosing of antihypertensives restores nocturnal dipping and reduces proteinuria [67–69]. Similarly, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, pirfenidone, and GCs may yield greater benefits when administered in alignment with the circadian rhythm [15, 70–72]. Even dialysis timing could be optimised to support hormonal and metabolic rhythms [73, 74].
Targeting the molecular clock itself represents another avenue [75–78]. Stabilising BMAL1 preserves antioxidant and antifibrotic activity in kidney cells [40]. Small molecules, such as REV-ERB agonists and casein kinase inhibitors, modulate clock amplitude and phase, and preclinical studies have reported reduced fibrosis in kidney tissue [78–80]. To minimise off-target effects, kidney-targeted delivery systems, including nanoparticles, are being explored for localised therapy [81–83].
Conclusion
Circadian control of the kidney matrisome influences both healthy ageing and the progression of CKD. Defining matrix rhythms across nephron segments and how they are altered in pathology may reveal new opportunities for intervention. A key unanswered question is how clocks in podocytes, mesangial cells, and tubular epithelia coordinate to maintain matrix homeostasis, and whether loss of synchrony among these cell types promotes fibrosis. Using circadian biomarkers and optimising treatment timing to restore alignment between systemic and kidney clocks may help protect kidney function.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Funding Sources
This research was primarily funded by a Wellcome PhD studentship to C.G. (Ref: 317456/Z/24/Z). R.L. is funded by Kidney Research UK and The Stoneygate Trust (Alport Research Hub), the Wellcome Trust (Ref: 226804/Z/22/Z, Ref: 227417/Z/23/Z, and Ref: 301803/Z/23/Z), and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308). R.P. is funded with a National Institute for Health Research Clinical Lectureship.
Author Contributions
C.G., R.L., and R.P. jointly conceived the review topic and scope. C.G. conducted the primary literature search and prepared the first draft. R.L. and R.P. contributed to writing, critical revision, and interpretation of the literature. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.