PeerJ

Developing and testing a method to reduce circAdpgk-0001 RNA using CRISPR-Cas13d technology

Updated

Abstract

Essence

A CRISPR-Cas13d approach knocked down circAdpgk-0001 in JS-1 cells more effectively than siRNA and more strongly reduced fibrosis-related markers.

Evidence

This cell-line knockdown experiment in JS-1 cells found optimized Cas13d with a 24-nt crRNA reached 70% circAdpgk-0001 knockdown versus 40% with siRNA and lowered collagen I and alpha-SMA by about 40%.

Caveat

The evidence is preclinical and limited to one cell-line RNA-targeting system, so it does not show performance or safety in animals or humans.

Simplified

Key numbers

70%
Increase in Efficiency
efficiency of using .
40%
Decrease in and α-SMA Expression
Expression reduction after with .

Key figures

Figure 1
efficiency of different and conditions on expression
Highlights siRNA-5’s stronger knockdown effect on circAdpgk-0001 across multiple transfection conditions
peerj-13-20123-g001
  • Panel A
    Relative circAdpgk-0001 and circAlpkq-0001 expression levels after treatment with different siRNAs plus TGF-β; siRNA-3 shows significantly lower circAdpgk-0001 expression compared to control and some other siRNAs
  • Panel B
    Relative circAdpgk-0001 expression under one transfection condition; siRNA-5 plus TGF-β shows significantly reduced expression compared to control and plus TGF-β
  • Panel C
    Relative circAdpgk-0001 expression under a second transfection condition; siRNA-5 plus TGF-β shows significantly reduced expression compared to control and NC plus TGF-β
  • Panel D
    Relative circAdpgk-0001 expression under a third transfection condition; siRNA-5 plus TGF-β shows significantly reduced expression compared to control and NC plus TGF-β
Figure 2
plasmid construction and efficiency of under various conditions
Highlights higher circAdpgk-0001 knockdown efficiency using Cas13d/24 compared to other plasmids and conditions
peerj-13-20123-g002
  • Panel A
    Lengths and sequences of spacers targeting the back-splicing junction () of circAdpgk-0001, with BSJ-flanking bases highlighted in brown
  • Panel B
    Knockdown efficiencies of different CRISPR-RfxCas13d-crRNA recombinant plasmids; Cas13d/24 shows higher knockdown than others
  • Panels C–E
    Knockdown efficiencies of Cas13d/24 under different conditions; Cas13d-24+TGF-β condition shows visibly lower circAdpgk-0001 expression compared to control and other groups
  • Panel F
    Expression levels of maternal gene ADPGK and circAdpgk-0001 after circAdpgk-0001 knockdown; circAdpgk-0001 expression is significantly reduced by Cas13d/24, while ADPGK mRNA remains unchanged
Figure 3
vs efficiency and effects on and α-SMA mRNA levels
Highlights higher knockdown efficiency and stronger reduction of collagen I and α-SMA mRNA by CRISPR-Cas13d versus siRNA
peerj-13-20123-g003
  • Panel A
    Relative expression levels under control, TGF-β, and siRNA+TGF-β or Cas13d+TGF-β conditions; siRNA+TGF-β and Cas13d+TGF-β show significantly lower expression than TGF-β alone
  • Panel B
    Knockdown efficiency comparison showing Cas13d/24 has higher efficiency (~60%) than siRNA-5 (~40%)
  • Panel C
    Relative mRNA expression of collagen I and α-SMA after circAdpgk-0001 knockdown by siRNA-5; both markers reduced compared to controls
  • Panel D
    Relative mRNA expression of collagen I and α-SMA after circAdpgk-0001 knockdown by Cas13d/24; both markers reduced compared to controls
  • Panel E
    Comparison of knockdown efficiency on collagen I and α-SMA mRNA levels showing Cas13d/24 has higher knockdown efficiency than siRNA-5
Figure 4
Control vs and : and α-SMA protein expression levels
Highlights higher protein knockdown efficiency of CRISPR-Cas13d compared to siRNA for collagen I and α-SMA expression
peerj-13-20123-g004
  • Panels A and B
    Western blot images and quantification of collagen I and α-SMA protein levels after knockdown by siRNA-5 (Panel A) and Cas13d/24 (Panel B) with TGF-β treatment; collagen I and α-SMA levels appear visibly reduced in siRNA-5+TGF-β and Cas13d/24+TGF-β groups compared to TGF-β alone, with Cas13d/24+TGF-β showing lower protein levels than siRNA-5+TGF-β; statistical significance indicated by and **
  • Panel C
    Bar graphs comparing knockdown efficiency at protein level between siRNA-5 and Cas13d-24 for collagen I and α-SMA; Cas13d-24 shows higher knockdown efficiency, especially for α-SMA with statistical significance (*)
1 / 4

Full Text

What this is

  • This research evaluates a new method for knocking down circular RNAs () using CRISPR-Cas13d technology.
  • The study compares the efficiency of this method against traditional small interfering RNA (siRNA) techniques.
  • Findings show that CRISPR-Cas13d significantly outperforms siRNA in reducing levels, specifically circAdpgk-0001.

Essence

  • CRISPR-Cas13d provides a more effective approach for knocking down circAdpgk-0001 compared to siRNA, achieving up to 70% knockdown efficiency.

Key takeaways

  • CRISPR-Cas13d achieved a knockdown efficiency of 70% for circAdpgk-0001, surpassing the 40% efficiency of siRNA.
  • Knockdown of circAdpgk-0001 using CRISPR-Cas13d reduced collagen I and α-SMA expression by approximately 40%, more than the 30% reduction seen with siRNA.

Caveats

  • The study primarily focuses on a single , circAdpgk-0001, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other .
  • Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects and potential off-target impacts of CRISPR-Cas13d technology.

Definitions

  • circRNA: A type of noncoding RNA with a circular structure, known for its stability and resistance to degradation.
  • CRISPR-Cas13: A gene-editing technology that targets RNA for degradation, offering advantages over traditional RNA interference methods.

Simplified

Funding

Competing interests

0 of 5
authors report competing interests
5 report none
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • ✅direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free