Full text is available at the source.
Health and social care delivery research···
Health screening clinic to reduce NHS staff absence and working while sick: eTHOS pilot trial
Updated
Abstract
Three hundred and fourteen participants were consented, with a recruitment rate of 8.3% from those invited.
- Forty-eight percent of the screened participants were eligible for referral to various health services.
- The early trial closure limited the assessment of attendance at referred services.
- Qualitative feedback indicated a perceived benefit for the health screening clinic among participants.
- The pilot identified a need for tailored engagement strategies to better reach underserved communities.
- COVID-19 impacted the delivery of the trial, affecting both recruitment and available referral services.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: Staff sickness absenteeism and presenteeism (attending work while unwell) incur high costs to the NHS, are associated with adverse patient outcomes and have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The main causes are mental and musculoskeletal ill health with cardiovascular risk factors common.
OBJECTIVES: To undertake a feasibility study to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a health screening clinic in reducing absenteeism and presenteeism amongst the National Health Service staff.
DESIGN: Individually randomised controlled pilot trial of the staff health screening clinic compared with usual care, including qualitative process evaluation.
SETTING: Four United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals from two urban and one rural Trust.
PARTICIPANTS: Hospital employees who had not previously attended a pilot health screening clinic at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham.
INTERVENTIONS: Nurse-led staff health screening clinic with assessment for musculoskeletal health (STarT musculoskeletal; STarT Back), mental health (patient health questionnaire-9; generalised anxiety disorder questionnaire-7) and cardiovascular health (NHS health check if aged ≥ 40, lifestyle check if < 40 years). Screen positives were given advice and/or referral to services according to UK guidelines.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The three coprimary outcomes were recruitment, referrals and attendance at referred services. These formed stop/go criteria when considered together. If any of these values fell into the 'amber' zone, then the trial would require modifications to proceed to full trial. If all were 'red', then the trial would be considered unfeasible. Secondary outcomes collected to inform the design of the definitive randomised controlled trial included: generalisability, screening results, individual referrals required/attended, health behaviours, acceptability/feasibility of processes, indication of contamination and costs. Outcomes related to the definitive trial included self-reported and employee records of absenteeism with reasons. Process evaluation included interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers. Descriptive statistics were presented and framework analysis conducted for qualitative data. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, outcomes were captured up to 6 months only.
RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen participants were consented (236 randomised), the majority within 4 months. The recruitment rate of 314/3788 (8.3%) invited was lower than anticipated (meeting red for this criteria), but screening identified that 57/118 (48.3%) randomised were eligible for referral to either general practitioner (81%), mental health (18%) and/or physiotherapy services (30%) (green). Early trial closure precluded determination of attendance at referrals, but 31.6% of those eligible reported intending to attend (amber). Fifty-one of the 80 (63.75%) planned qualitative interviews were conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data from the process evaluation indicated that the electronic database-driven screening intervention and data collection were efficient, promoting good fidelity, although needing more personalisation at times. Recruitment and delivery of the full trial would benefit from a longer development period to better understand local context, develop effective strategies for engaging with underserved groups, provide longer training and better integration with referral services. Delivery of the pilot was limited by the impact of COVID-19 with staff redeployment, COVID-research prioritisation and reduced availability of community and in-house referral services. While recruitment was rapid, it did not fully represent ethnic minority groups and truncated follow-up due to funding limitations prevented full assessment of attendance at recommended services and secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is both a clinical need (evidenced by 48% screened eligible for a referral) and perceived benefit (data from the qualitative interviews) for this National Health Service staff health screening clinic. The three stop/go criteria were red, green and amber; therefore, the Trial Oversight Committee recommended that a full-scale trial should proceed, but with modifications to adapt to local context and adopt processes to engage better with underserved communities.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ISRCTN10237475.
FUNDING: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/42/42) and is published in full in; Vol. 12, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Related papers
Jul '22
Testing a health screening clinic to reduce sick leave and low productivity among NHS staff compared to usual care
top 30% journal
journal article
Mar '21
A case management approach to help NHS staff with common mental health problems return to work sooner: a feasibility study
cited by 11 papers
randomized controlled trial
Feb '24
Training to reduce conflict in adult acute and forensic hospital units: review and trial of the EDITION program
cited by 15 papers
systematic review
Sep '24
The Resilience Hub’s support for health and social care workers’ mental health during COVID-19: a mixed-methods study
top 30% journal
cited by 3 papers
journal article
Oct '19
Using the AMBER care plan for hospital patients with uncertain recovery near end of life: a feasibility trial
cited by 18 papers
randomized controlled trial
Aug '22
Testing a video-feedback program to help caregivers of foster children under 6 with attachment difficulties
cited by 10 papers
randomized controlled trial
Sep '24
A community program outside court to improve health and well-being of young adult offenders: the Gateway trial
randomized controlled trial
Mar '20
Testing a pre-surgery program to help reduce drinking before planned bone and joint surgery
cited by 10 papers
randomized controlled trial
Jun '17
Debt Counselling and Its Effects on Depression in Primary Care: A Flexible Pilot Trial
cited by 16 papers
randomized controlled trial
Dec '19
Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: a feasibility trial
cited by 19 papers
randomized controlled trial