Pharmaceutics

Lipid Nanoparticles Help Deliver EGF mRNA to Improve Wound Healing

Updated

Abstract

Essence

A pH-sensitive lipid nanoparticle carrying EGF mRNA improved skin wound repair in mice by sustaining local EGF expression after one dose.

Evidence

This preclinical formulation study tested EGF mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles in HaCaT cells and a mouse full-thickness skin wound model, where treated wounds were nearly closed by day 10 and outperformed saline, empty LNP, and recombinant EGF controls.

Caveat

The evidence comes from cell and mouse experiments, so the healing benefit and safety are not yet established in humans.

Simplified

Full Text

1. Introduction

Burns are common acute injuries. Severe burns can trigger hypovolemic shock, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and even sepsis within hours [1]. In addition, long-term physical disabilities and mental health consequences, including posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and social isolation, are also challenges faced by survivors. Causes range from flames, electricity, and chemicals to iatrogenic sources such as fractional CO2 lasers [2,3]. Regardless of etiology, wound outcome hinges on standardized, meticulous care. However, explosive free-radical damage, inadequate epithelial regeneration, impaired granulation tissue clearance, compromised angiogenesis, and disordered collagen deposition often delays healing or produce pathological scars [4,5]. The skin has an intrinsic repair program: diverse cells, cytokines, and growth factors coordinate hemostasis, inflammation control, cell recruitment, proliferation, differentiation, and matrix remodeling [6]. Disturbance at any point can decelerate or completely stop the typical healing progression.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a master regulator of wound repair, and promotes the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and vascular endothelial cells, while simultaneously sculpting the extracellular matrix composition to favor remodeling [7,8,9]. EGF attachment to EGFR initiates the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling cascades, greatly enhancing keratinocyte proliferation and migration, thus decreasing the re-epithelialization duration [10]. Despite its effectiveness in closing wounds, recombinant EGF faces challenges in clinical use due to poor absorption, a brief half-life, and expensive production.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) has emerged as a highly promising tool for protein replacement therapy [11,12]. The key advantages of mRNA drugs are rapid yet transient protein expression, no risk of genomic integration, low immunogenicity (they are less likely than viral vectors to trigger an unwanted immune response), and a manufacturing process that is both fast and easily scalable [13,14].

Although the therapeutic potential of mRNA vaccines has been validated in the clinic, no mRNA-based therapy has yet been approved for wound healing. The primary challenges include the rapid degradation of naked mRNA by nucleases, its quick clearance from the body, and its inefficient uptake by target cells, resulting in low expression levels [15,16,17]. The root problem is the lack of a delivery system that is both safe and efficient. mRNA’s inability to traverse cell membranes independently, due to its long and negatively charged polynucleotide form, has restricted its clinical use. To overcome this, researchers have developed a variety of carriers that stabilize mRNA in vivo and protect them from degradation, including lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), cationic peptides, polymers, micelles, and dendrimers [18,19].

Among these, LNPs stand out as the most developed platform: they exhibit low immunogenicity, safeguard mRNA from nucleases, are suitable for large-scale production, have a high capacity for payloads, and can be surface-modified for targeted delivery [20,21]. LNP offers the significant advantage of facilitating continuous protein expression in vivo following a single dose, thereby minimizing dosing frequency and increasing practicality. For instance, a single administration of a trisulfide-derived LNP delivering IL-4 mRNA accelerated wound healing [12]. Therefore, advanced LNP design transforms a single mRNA dose into weeks of protein production, changing the landscape of conventional protein therapies. Applying this technique to deliver EGF mRNA could result in infrequent dosing, providing stable and localized EGF expression at wounds, thereby overcoming the short half-life and need for repeated applications of recombinant proteins, with considerable translational potential.

The study’s aim is to formulate an LNP delivery system with EGF mRNA to facilitate skin wound healing through a single administration, ensuring a long-lasting therapeutic effect. Initially, EGF mRNA was generated through in vitro transcription and later encapsulated in an LNP delivery system using a microfluidic approach. The core advantage of this platform, functioning as a protein replacement therapy, lies in its ability to mediate stable and sustained local expression of EGF at the wound site following a single dose, thereby effectively accelerating the wound healing process. In contrast to traditional recombinant protein therapies, which require frequent administration due to their short half-life, this system significantly reduces dosing frequency, offering a promising new clinical strategy for skin wound treatment (Scheme 1).

Illustration of LNP-mRNAfabricated via microfluidics and functioning in local tissue at the wound site (Drawn by. 21 October 2025. Figdraw). EGF https://www.figdraw.com

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The spontaneously immortalized human keratinocyte line HaCaT (QuiCell-H439, Shanghai Kuisai Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Shanghai, China) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2 and authenticated through Short Tandem Repeat. Antarctic phosphatase (M0289L, New England Biolabs, Beijing, China) and the FlowOrigin M reagent kit were purchased from Mingtai Pharmaceutical Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). eGFP mRNA (BN-mRNA-eGFP-100) was purchased from Beinu Biotech (Shanghai, China). The calcein/PI cell viability/cytotoxicity assay kit (C2015S), crystal violet staining solution (C0121), H&E Stain (G1005), and Masson’s trichrome stain (G1006) were obtained from Beyotime (Shanghai, China) and Servicebio (Wuhan, China), respectively. Primary antibodies against EGF (27141-1-AP), collagen I (66761-1-Ig), collagen III (22734-1-AP), and E-cadherin (20874-1-AP) were purchased from Proteintech (Wuhan, China).

2.2. mRNA Synthesis

mRNA synthesis was performed as previously described [22]. Briefly, a linearized DNA template—purified after restriction digestion—was transcribed in vitro with T7 RNA polymerase at 37 °C for 2 h. Following transcription, free nucleotides and short RNA fragments were removed using an Ambion MEGAclear kit (Shanghai, China) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The eluted RNA was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with Antarctic Phosphatase (New England Biolabs, Beijing, China) to remove residual 5′-phosphates and then repurified through the same MEGAclear column. The final product was quantified on a NanoDrop One spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China), adjusted to 1 mg mL−1 in RNase-free 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), aliquoted, and stored at –80 °C until use.

2.3. Preparation and Characterization of LNP-mRNA EGF

The preparation of LNP-mRNAEGF was based on a previously reported method with further optimizations [23]. Briefly, the aqueous phase was prepared by diluting 0.3 mL of an mRNA solution (1 mg/mL) to a final concentration of 0.17 mg/mL using a sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.0). The organic phase was formulated by mixing four lipid components in equal volumes: DLin-MC3-DMA (25 mmol/L), DOPC (5 mmol/L), cholesterol (19.25 mmol/L), and DMG-PEG2000 (0.75 mmol/L). For synthesis, the aqueous and organic phases were utilized at volumes of 1.65 mL and 0.55 mL, respectively. The diluted aqueous phase was loaded into syringes and secured at the inlets of a new chip. Mixing was then carried out via a Microflow S chip device, yielding LNP-mRNAEGF. The LNP was fabricated following a similar protocol.

Immediately following the microfluidic process, a 100 µL aliquot of the freshly prepared LNP-mRNAEGF suspension was diluted tenfold with 0.22 µm filtered, particle-free ultrapure water. The Z-average diameter and polydispersity index (PDI) were determined via dynamic light scattering. For further morphological examination, 5 µL of the undiluted LNP sample was applied onto a glow-discharged 200-mesh copper grid. After allowing 60 s for adsorption, the residual liquid was removed via Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the grid was air-dried at room temperature for two minutes. A subsequent negative staining procedure was performed: the grid was placed on a 20 µL drop of 2% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.0) for 30 s, followed by blotting and complete drying. Micrographs were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

The mRNA concentrations obtained by disrupting the LNP structure with SDS and without disrupting the LNP structure are designated as total mRNA and free mRNA, respectively. The encapsulation efficiency is calculated based on these values. The formula for encapsulation efficiency is Encapsulation efficiency = (total RNA concentration − free RNA concentration)/total RNA concentration × 100%.

2.4. Cellular Uptake

LNP-mRNAEGF was labeled with the fluorescent dye 3,3′-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate and co-incubated with HaCaT cells cultured in media at different pH levels for 2 h at 37 °C. After fixation and nuclear staining with DAPI, cellular uptake efficiency was assessed and quantified using fluorescence microscopy.

2.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay of LNP and LNP-mRNA

HaCaT cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well and cultured overnight in a 37 °C incubator. After cell attachment, the cells were treated with various concentrations of LNP and LNP-mRNAGFP, followed by further incubation. After treatment, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium containing CCK-8 reagent, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the optical density of each well was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader to assess cell viability.

2.6. In Vitro Transfection with LNP-mRNA GFP

HaCaT cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well and cultured overnight in a 37 °C incubator. The following day, the cells were treated with varying concentrations of LNP-mRNAGFP and cultured further. Subsequently, the cells were trypsinized, harvested, and analyzed by flow cytometry to determine GFP expression efficiency. Similarly, GFP fluorescence intensity was observed and measured at different time points using fluorescence microscopy.

2.7. Analysis of EGF Expression in HaCaT Cells

The concentration of EGF in cell culture supernatants was quantitatively determined by ELISA. The assay was performed with a commercial Human EGF ELISA Kit (E-EL-H0059, Elabscience, Wuhan, China) strictly following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cell culture supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1000× g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove cells and debris. The clarified supernatants were either used immediately or stored at –80 °C for subsequent analysis. A standard curve was prepared by serially diluting the EGF standard to concentrations ranging from 3.91 to 250 pg/mL. Aliquots (100 µL) of each standard or sample were added to a 96-well microplate pre-coated with an anti-human EGF antibody and incubated at 37 °C for 90 min. After washing, biotinylated detection antibody followed by horseradish peroxidase-labeled avidin were added sequentially, with incubation at 37 °C for 60 min and 30 min, respectively. Following another wash step, TMB substrate solution was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 µL of stop solution per well, and the absorbance was immediately measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

2.8. Proliferation Assay

A CCK-8 kit (C0038, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used to evaluate cell proliferation. HaCat cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with Opti-MEM I reduced-serum medium, and the cells were treated with either LNP-mRNAEGF or recombinant human EGF (rhEGF) protein, which served as a positive control. At 24 and 72 h post-treatment, CCK-8 reagent was subsequently added to each well, and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured to monitor cell proliferation.

2.9. Scratch Wound HEALING Assay

HaCaT cells were seeded in 12-well plates and cultured until reaching 80–90% confluency. A sterile pipette tip was used to create a uniform scratch in the cell monolayer across the center of each well. After gently washing the cells twice with PBS, the medium was replaced with serum-free medium, and the initial scratch images (0 h) were captured under a microscope. The cells were then treated with different formulations and cultured for an additional 48 h. After incubation, the same scratch areas were re-imaged, and cell migration ability was evaluated by measuring the change in scratch width.

2.10. Transwell Migration Assay

HaCaT cells were seeded in the upper chamber of a Transwell insert (8 μm pore polycarbonate membrane, Corning, Shanghai, China) at an appropriate density. After cell attachment, the medium was replaced with serum-free medium, and different formulations were added to the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with medium containing the corresponding treatments. Following 24 h of incubation, the Transwell inserts were removed. Non-migrated cells on the upper surface of the membrane were gently wiped away with a cotton swab. The migrated cells on the lower surface were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min, and gently rinsed with PBS. The membranes were then observed under a microscope, and the number of migrated cells was counted.

2.11. Wound Healing Study

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol (IACUC-20251010) and followed standard humane care practices. To assess the therapeutic effect of LNP-mRNAEGF on wound healing, 55 male C57BL/6 mice (obtained from Shanghai Jihui Laboratory Animal Care Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were anesthetized, and the hair on their dorsal skin was carefully removed. An 8 mm full-thickness wound was created on the dorsal skin via a high-frequency laser. The mice were then administered intradermal injections (using a BD insulin syringe) at four periwound sites with one of the following: Normal Saline, empty LNP, LNP-mRNAEGF (40 µL of LNP formulation containing 20 µg mRNA per injection site) or rhEGF. Wound healing was monitored by capturing digital images on days 0, 3, 6, and 10, and the wound area was quantified via ImageJ 10.2 software to determine the rate of closure.

2.12. Histology Analysis

On day 10, the mice were euthanized, and 8 mm punch biopsies were collected from the wound sites. The tissue samples were fixed in 4% formalin, subjected to dehydration through a graded ethanol series, and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with H&E for histological evaluation and with Masson’s trichrome for collagen visualization. Finally, the stained sections were imaged via an microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Shanghai, China).

2.13. Immunostaining

Dorsal wound tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), cryoprotected by immersion in 30% sucrose, and subsequently embedded in OCT compound prior to snap freezing. Sections of 7 μm thickness were prepared, followed by antigen retrieval via citrate buffer and permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100. The sections were then blocked with goat serum for one hour and incubated with primary antibodies targeting CD31, COLI/II, and E-cadherin at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the sections were exposed to Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies and incubated in the dark for one hour at room temperature. Finally, the nuclei were stained with DAPI, and the slides were coverslipped with mounting medium for confocal microscopy analysis.

2.14. Expression of EGF in Skin Tissue

Skin tissue samples were collected at predetermined time points and thoroughly homogenized to prepare tissue lysates. The content of human EGF in the tissue lysates was quantitatively measured by ELISA. The specific experimental procedures were consistent with the aforementioned in vitro ELISA detection method.

2.15. Data Analysis and Statistics

The data were processed, and graphical representations were generated via GraphPad Prism software (version 10.1). For comparisons between two groups, unpaired Student’s t tests were applied. Comparisons across multiple groups were conducted by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s test for post hoc analysis. A probability (p) value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fabrication and Characterization of LNP-mRNA EGF

LNP-mRNAEGF was created using microfluidic technology. To directly evaluate mRNA entrapment, agarose gel electrophoresis was performed, comparing LNP-mRNAEGF with its intact lipid structure to samples that had been treated with SDS for lipid disruption. In Figure S1, a noticeable mRNA band was present only in the SDS-treated sample, where the lipid structure was disrupted, while the intact LNP sample showed no band. This result demonstrates that the mRNA in the prepared LNP-mRNAEGF formulation is effectively encapsulated within the lipid nanoparticles. Additionally, the content measurement within the LNP showed an encapsulation efficiency of 88 ± 2% (Figure S2).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization showed that both blank LNP and LNP-mRNAEGF had a typical spherical shape (Figure 1A). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis showed that the average hydrodynamic diameter of the blank LNP was consistent with the TEM observations (Figure 1B). Both formulations displayed low polydispersity indices (PDI), indicating a relatively uniform particle size distribution (Figure 1C). Furthermore, at pH 6.5, the Z-average size and PDI of both LNP and LNP-mRNAEGF remained largely comparable to those at pH 7.4 (Figure 1D and Figure S3). The analysis of zeta potential revealed a notable variation dependent on pH, due to the protonatable characteristics of the lipid components. Figure 1E illustrates their distinct zeta potentials at different pH values: a negative charge at physiological pH 7.4, which reduces nonspecific cellular uptake, and a slightly positive charge in acidic environments. This pH-dependent charge reversal is anticipated to enhance electrostatic interactions with negatively charged cell membranes, thereby potentially promoting nanoparticle uptake at the slightly acidic wound microenvironment. To confirm these results, we used the green fluorescent dye 3,3′-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine per-chlorate to label LNP-mRNAEGF and measured its internalization in HaCaT cells across different pH environments. Data presented in Figure 1F,G demonstrate that cellular uptake was markedly enhanced at pH 6.5 relative to pH 7.4 (p < 0.01).

Furthermore, the storage stability of the nanoparticles was evaluated over a 10-day period by monitoring changes in Z-average size. The hydrodynamic diameter increased by only 10 ± 3% for the blank LNP and 19 ± 1% for LNP-mRNAEGF, indicating good stability under storage conditions (Figure S4). These physicochemical characteristics collectively support the potential of LNP-mRNAEGF as a stable and efficient mRNA delivery platform.

Characterization of LNP-mRNA. () Transmission electron microscopy image (scale bar: 100 nm). () Dynamic light scattering of LNP and LNP-mRNA(pH 7.4). () Polydispersity index of LNP and LNP-mRNA(pH 7.4). () Dynamic light scattering of LNP and LNP-mRNA(pH 6.5). () Zeta potential of LNP and LNP-mRNAat different pH levels. () The uptake efficiency of LNP at different pH levels (scale bar: 50 μm). () The quantitative results of (). The data are the mean ± SD (= 3). **< 0.01. A-test was performed using GraphPad Prism software. EGF EGF EGF EGF EGF A B C D E F G F n p t

3.2. In Vitro Safety and Transfection Efficiency of LNP-mRNA

To evaluate the biosafety of the LNP in a systematic manner, we started by assessing its cytotoxicity in HaCaT cells. As shown in Figure 2A, with an increase in LNP dose, cell viability gradually lessened; however, concentrations up to 4.875 µg mL−1 did not show a statistically significant decrease, implying this concentration is non-toxic. Thus, taking into account cell viability and possible therapeutic benefits, a concentration of 4.875 µg mL−1 might be appropriate for in vitro studies. Following this, we explored if mRNA loading impacts the cytocompatibility of LNP. LNPs with GFP mRNA (LNP-mRNAGFP) were compared against empty LNPs. The viability curves overlapped almost perfectly (Figure 2B), and live/dead staining confirmed that mRNA encapsulation did not increase cytotoxicity (Figure 2C), indicating that the particles retained their excellent safety profile after loading.

With safety established, we quantified the transfection efficiency. HaCaT cells were incubated for 12 h with increasing doses of LNP-mRNAGFP, and GFP expression was analyzed via flow cytometry. The percentage of transfected cells increased with increasing particle concentration and plateaued at 2.438 µg mL−1 (Figure 2D,E and Figure S5). Fluorescence microscopy revealed expression for 72 h; the signal intensity continued to increase through the final time point (Figure 2F and Figure S6), demonstrating that a single dose of LNP-mRNAGFP can sustain robust protein expression for at least three days. Furthermore, to evaluate the expression level of EGF in HaCaT cells, we employed LNP-mRNAEGF at varying concentrations. The results demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in EGF expression across the tested concentration range, with the peak level observed at 4.875 µg·mL−1, which exhibited the highest EGF secretion (Figure S7).

Taken together, these data show that the LNP platform is biocompatible at therapeutically relevant concentrations and mediates efficient, prolonged mRNA expression in human keratinocytes, providing a solid rationale for advancing to in vivo wound healing studies.

Cytotoxicity and transfection efficiency of LNP. () Cytotoxicity of LNP at various concentrations. () Cytotoxicity of LNP-mRNAat various concentrations. () Live/dead staining of cells treated with LNP-mRNA(scale bar: 100 μm). () Flow cytometry analysis of GFP expression in HaCaT cells after transfection with LNP-mRNAat different concentrations. () Quantitative flow cytometry results for LNP-mRNAexpression at different concentrations. () Expression of LNP-mRNAat different time points under fluorescence microscopy (scale bar: 100 μm). This line in () represents the gating threshold used to separate negative and positive cell populations. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (= 3). ns = No significance. **< 0.01; ***< 0.001. Two-way ANOVA was done with GraphPad Prism software. A B C D E F D GFP EGF GFP GFP GFP n p p

3.3. Effects of LNP-mRNAon HaCaT Cell Proliferation and Migration EGF

EGF is known to drive HaCaT keratinocyte proliferation by activating the EGF receptor and its downstream ERK/Akt axis [24]. We therefore hypothesized that delivering EGF-encoding mRNA via LNP (LNP-mRNAEGF) would reproduce proliferation. As early as 24 h posttreatment, cell viability assays revealed a significant increase in metabolic activity (Figure 3A). Because our earlier work revealed that LNP- mRNA remains expressed for at least 72 h, we extended the observation window. By 72 h, the proliferation index increased from 117 ± 3% at 24 h to 136 ± 2% (Figure 3B), indicating that continuously synthesized EGF exerts a sustained and amplified bioactive response.

In addition to promoting proliferation, LNP-mRNAEGF has been shown in studies to guide the migration of HaCaT cells [25]. Figure 3C,D demonstrate that the closure rate of monolayers treated with LNP-mRNAEGF was significantly quicker and comparable to the rate achieved with recombinant EGF protein. Transwell assays corroborated these findings: the number of cells that traversed the membrane was significantly greater in the LNP-mRNAEGF group (Figure 3E and Figure S8), collectively demonstrating a robust promigratory capacity.

Taken together, these data confirm that LNP-mRNAEGF expresses bioactive EGF in HaCaT cells and simultaneously amplifies both proliferation and migration—key cellular events in cutaneous repair—thereby providing experimental support for its potential use in skin-regenerative therapy.

LNP-mRNApromotes cell proliferation and migration. () Proliferation efficiency of HaCaT cells after 24 h of LNP-mRNAtreatment. () Proliferation efficiency of HaCaT cells after 72 h of LNP-mRNAtreatment. (,) Migration efficiency and quantification of HaCaT cells after 48 h of LNP-mRNAtreatment (scale bar: 100 μm). () Transwell migration assay of HaCaT cells (scale bar: 100 μm). The data are presented as the mean ± SD (= 3). *< 0.05; **< 0.01; ****< 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA was done with GraphPad Prism software. EGF EGF EGF EGF A B C D E n p p p

3.4. LNP-mRNAPromotes Mouse Wound Healing EGF

To assess the wound healing effectiveness of LNP-mRNAEGF in living organisms, a model with an 8 mm diameter circular full-thickness skin defect was created in mice using a fractional CO2 laser (Figure 4A). Subsequently, the mice were randomly divided into four groups, receiving treatments of LNP, LNP-mRNAEGF, and rhEGF, respectively, with an equivalent volume of normal saline serving as the blank control group. According to Figure 4B, the wound area in the LNP-mRNAEGF group was significantly smaller than in the control and LNP groups by day 6 after treatment, as shown by the photos and healing simulation diagrams. The quantitative data (Figure 4C) reveal that, by day 6, the LNP-mRNAEGF group had an average residual area of 31% of the original, compared to 56% in the control group and 47% in the LNP group (p < 0.001), confirming that mRNA treatment significantly accelerated healing. By day 10, the wounds in the LNP-mRNAEGF group had almost completely closed, whereas those in the other two groups still had >20% of the area remaining unhealed. To further investigate the in vivo kinetics of EGF expression, mice were administered a single dose of LNP-mRNAEGF, and skin tissue from the wound region was collected at set time points for ELISA analysis. As shown in Figure S9, the level of EGF in the wound tissue increased over time, peaked on day 5, and remained elevated on day 7. These results demonstrate that a single administration of LNP-mRNAEGF enables the sustained, local expression of EGF at the wound site, supporting its role in promoting the healing process.

Re-epithelialization is the first critical step in skin wound healing and occurs before the dermis begins to mature [26]. The rapid formation of a temporary barrier during injury stops excessive water loss and prevents bacteria from escaping, safeguarding the underlying tissue [27]. To verify the regeneration of the epidermis, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson’s trichrome staining were performed on the wounds after treatment. As shown in Figure 4D, the tissue in the LNP-mRNAEGF treatment group exhibited obvious epithelialization, whereas the control and LNP groups presented almost no epithelial formation. Furthermore, the results of Masson’s trichrome staining (Figure 4E,F) showed a significant enhancement in collagen deposition within the LNP-mRNAEGF group (p < 0.0001).

To elucidate the potential mechanisms by which LNP-mRNAEGF promotes wound healing in wounds, immunofluorescence staining was performed on the wound tissues. In Figure 5A, it is shown that the skin EGF levels in the LNP-mRNAEGF group were notably higher than those in the control and LNP groups, with a clear expression advantage over rhEGF (p < 0.001), suggesting that mRNA therapy can stably and continuously express EGF, achieving long-term therapeutic effects.

Collagen remodeling is the “final stage” of wound healing and is also the core link that determines the strength of the recovery of skin function. Type I collagen, after being deposited, is cross-linked by lysyl oxidase into dense, bundle-like structures, which provide mechanical support and serve as a barrier for the newly formed tissue [28]. If type III collagen is continuously overexpressed and cross-linking is insufficient, the fiber arrangement becomes disordered, which can easily lead to hypertrophic scarring. In the advanced phases, an increase in the ratio of type I to type III collagen and more organized bundle-like structures result in the wound becoming softer and flatter, with its function almost returning to normal [29]. Collagen staining was performed on the skin of each group, and, as shown in Figure 5B, compared with the control group, the LNP-mRNAEGF group presented a significantly greater ratio of type I to type III collagen, indicating that this treatment can promote wound healing and improve skin function.

E-cadherin is the most abundant calcium-dependent adhesion molecule in epidermal cells. It forms junctions that “lock” adjacent keratinocytes together, ensuring that the entire epidermis remains intact under continuous external force without tearing [30]. The expression level of E-cadherin directly determines the integrity of the barrier and the ability to suppress inflammation [31]. Figure 5C shows that the expression of E-cadherin in the LNP-mRNAEGF group was significantly greater than that in the control group, indicating that this formulation can not only accelerate healing but also rebuild the cellular barrier and suppress inflammation, demonstrating great potential for application.

Finally, H&E staining of samples from the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney after treatment indicated preserved tissue architecture without any signs of inflammatory infiltration, necrosis, fibrosis, or immune-related injury (Figure S10). Concurrently, blood biochemical analysis showed no significant abnormalities. Collectively, these results indicate that LNP-mRNAEGF exhibited a favorable safety profile in vivo during the treatment period (Figure S11).

This study aimed to develop an LNP-mRNAEGF delivery platform and validate its overall therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, the experimental design focused on endpoint measures such as wound closure rate, histological morphology, and changes in key protein expression. Within this framework, systematic longitudinal quantitative data on cellular behaviors—such as the migration rate of keratinocytes at the re-epithelialization front, and the dynamic number and spatial distribution of specific cell subsets in the dermis—were not collected. This limitation restricts a more in-depth, single-cell-level analysis of the dynamic mechanisms through which this treatment accelerates wound healing. Furthermore, although a single dose of 20 μg LNP-mRNAEGF used in this study demonstrated significant pro-healing effects, whether this represents the optimal dosage regimen requires further systematic investigation and validation.

Therapeutic effects of LNP-mRNAon wound healing. () Schematic diagram of the experimental procedure. () Representative images of wound areas in mice over time under different treatments. () Wound healing rates in mice subjected to different treatments. () Representative H&E staining images of mouse wounds after 10 days of treatment (scale bar: 100 μm). (,) Representative Masson staining images of mouse wounds and quantitative collagen results after 10 days of treatment (scale bar: 100 μm). The data are presented as the mean ± SD (= 4). ns = No significance. ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA was done with GraphPad Prism software. EGF A B C D E F n p p

Immunostaining of skin tissue after LNP-mRNAtreatment. () Immunofluorescence staining of EGF and its fluorescence quantification in skin tissue subjected to different treatments (scale bar: 100 μm). () Immunofluorescence staining of type I (red) and type III (green) collagen and their ratios in skin tissue 10 days after different treatments (scale bar: 100 μm). () Immunofluorescence staining of E-cadherin and its quantification in the epidermis of skin tissue 10 days after different treatments (scale bar: 100 μm). The data are presented as the means ± SD (= 4). *< 0.05; ***< 0.001; ****< 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA was done with GraphPad Prism software. EGF A B C n p p p

4. Conclusions

This study reports an LNP-mRNA delivery system for skin repair. The system enables the efficient delivery and sustained expression of EGF. In wound models, a single administration significantly promoted healing and demonstrated a greater potential for practical application compared to traditional recombinant protein therapies. Furthermore, the modular design of this LNP platform suggests the potential for adaptation to deliver mRNA encoding other growth factors, though this requires experimental validation in future studies. It should be noted that this study only validated the delivery efficacy of the platform for EGF mRNA. The potential for extending this platform is primarily based on the modular design principle of its LNP formulation, which is not dependent on specific mRNA sequences, as well as reports in the literature that similar LNP platforms have successfully delivered mRNAs encoding various proteins [32,33]. However, the delivery efficiency and therapeutic efficacy of this platform for other growth factors or mRNAs encoding different classes of proteins must be systematically verified through subsequent experimental studies.

Moreover, we observed that different mRNAs exhibit distinct dose–response characteristics: EGF mRNA expression increased continuously within the tested concentration range (up to 4.875 µg·mL−1), whereas GFP mRNA reached a plateau at 2.438 µg·mL−1. This suggests that the translational dynamics of mRNA are not only related to the delivery system but may also depend on its sequence structure, the properties of the encoded protein, and cellular metabolic capacity. Therefore, the therapeutic window—that is, the safe and effective dose range—must be independently determined for each mRNA, and concentration data from a single mRNA cannot be directly extrapolated to others.

Finally, in vitro toxicity experiments indicated that the safety threshold of this LNP carrier is approximately 4.875 µg·mL−1. Combined with the above mRNA expression profiles, it can be inferred that this LNP is not a universal carrier: for mRNAs that achieve saturated expression at low doses (such as GFP), the safety window is relatively wide; however, for mRNAs that require higher doses to be effective, approaching or exceeding the carrier’s toxicity threshold may cause damage to cells and tissues.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

EGFEpidermal growth factor
LNPLipid nanoparticle
IVTIn vitro transcription
PDIPolydispersity index
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
DLSDynamic light scattering
HaCaTHuman Immortalized Keratinocyte Cell Line
CCK-8Cell Counting Kit-8
rhEGFRecombinant human EGF
H&EHematoxylin and eosin
COL ICollagen type I
COL IIICollagen type III
PFAParaformaldehyde
OCTOptimal cutting temperature
DAPI4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
GFPGreen fluorescent protein
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics18020215/s1, Figure S1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of LNP-mRNAEGF; Figure S2. The mRNA concentrations obtained by disrupting the LNP structure with SDS and without disrupting the LNP structure are referred to as total mRNA and free mRNA, respectively; Figure S3. Polydispersity index of LNP and LNP-mRNAEGF (pH 6.5); Figure S4. The change in Z-average size of LNP and LNP-mRNAEGF over 10 days; Figure S5. Gating strategy for flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression; Figure S6. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of GFP in HaCaT cells; Figure S7. Expression of EGF in HaCaT cells following treatment with LNP-mRNAEGF at various concentrations; Figure S8. Quantitative analysis of transwell migration assay; Figure S9. Kinetics of EGF expression in wound tissue after LNP-mRNAEGF administration; Figure S10. H&E staining of major organs; Figure S11. Blood biochemical analysis of mice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Z. and W.F.; Formal analysis, Q.Z., W.L. and H.W.; Investigation, Q.Z., W.L. and H.W.; Methodology, Q.Z. and W.L.; Project administration, Q.Z., W.F. and D.D.; Software, Q.Z. and J.G.; Writing—original draft, Q.Z.; Validation, J.G. and X.L.; Funding acquisition, X.L. and D.D.; Resources, W.F. and D.D.; Writing—review and editing, D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. IACUC-20251010, 10 October 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173396 to D.D.) and the Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (No. SHDC22025306 to X.L.).

Footnotes

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Funding

Competing interests

0 of 7
authors report competing interests
7 report none
PubMed

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • ✅direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free