The Cochrane database of systematic reviewsMar 27, 2023

Methylphenidate treatment for children and teens with ADHD

Psychedelic Science Weekly Brief ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Updated Jan 1, 2026

Abstract

A total of 16,302 participants were randomized across 212 trials assessing the effects of methylphenidate for ADHD.

Methylphenidate treatment may lead to improvements in teacher-rated ADHD symptoms, with a standardized mean difference of -0.74.
There may be no significant impact on serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate treatment.
The treatment could be linked to a higher occurrence of non-serious adverse events, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite.
Improvements in general behavior may be observed with methylphenidate, indicated by a standardized mean difference of -0.62.
Quality of life may not be significantly affected by methylphenidate, showing a negligible standardized mean difference of 0.40.
The overall certainty of evidence for these outcomes is very low, leaving the true effects unclear.

Simplified

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most commonly diagnosed and treated psychiatric disorders in childhood. Typically, children and adolescents with ADHD find it difficult to pay attention and they are hyperactive and impulsive. Methylphenidate is the psychostimulant most often prescribed, but the evidence on benefits and harms is uncertain. This is an update of our comprehensive systematic review on benefits and harms published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with ADHD.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trials registers up to March 2022. In addition, we checked reference lists and requested published and unpublished data from manufacturers of methylphenidate.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention in children and adolescents aged 18 years and younger with a diagnosis of ADHD. The search was not limited by publication year or language, but trial inclusion required that 75% or more of participants had a normal intellectual quotient (IQ > 70). We assessed two primary outcomes, ADHD symptoms and serious adverse events, and three secondary outcomes, adverse events considered non-serious, general behaviour, and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment for each trial. Six review authors including two review authors from the original publication participated in the update in 2022. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Data from parallel-group trials and first-period data from cross-over trials formed the basis of our primary analyses. We undertook separate analyses using end-of-last period data from cross-over trials. We used Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA) to control for type I (5%) and type II (20%) errors, and we assessed and downgraded evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS: We included 212 trials (16,302 participants randomised); 55 parallel-group trials (8104 participants randomised), and 156 cross-over trials (8033 participants randomised) as well as one trial with a parallel phase (114 participants randomised) and a cross-over phase (165 participants randomised). The mean age of participants was 9.8 years ranging from 3 to 18 years (two trials from 3 to 21 years). The male-female ratio was 3:1. Most trials were carried out in high-income countries, and 86/212 included trials (41%) were funded or partly funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Methylphenidate treatment duration ranged from 1 to 425 days, with a mean duration of 28.8 days. Trials compared methylphenidate with placebo (200 trials) and with no intervention (12 trials). Only 165/212 trials included usable data on one or more outcomes from 14,271 participants. Of the 212 trials, we assessed 191 at high risk of bias and 21 at low risk of bias. If, however, deblinding of methylphenidate due to typical adverse events is considered, then all 212 trials were at high risk of bias.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES: methylphenidate versus placebo or no intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.88 to -0.61; I² = 38%; 21 trials; 1728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This corresponds to a mean difference (MD) of -10.58 (95% CI -12.58 to -8.72) on the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS; range 0 to 72 points). The minimal clinically relevant difference is considered to be a change of 6.6 points on the ADHD-RS. Methylphenidate may not affect serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.67; I² = 0%; 26 trials, 3673 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 0.91 (CI 0.31 to 2.68).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: methylphenidate may cause more adverse events considered non-serious versus placebo or no intervention (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37; I² = 72%; 35 trials 5342 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The TSA-adjusted intervention effect was RR 1.22 (CI 1.08 to 1.43). Methylphenidate may improve teacher-rated general behaviour versus placebo (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.33; I² = 68%; 7 trials 792 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but may not affect quality of life (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.83; I² = 81%; 4 trials, 608 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our conclusions from the 2015 version of this review still apply. Our updated meta-analyses suggest that methylphenidate versus placebo or no-intervention may improve teacher-rated ADHD symptoms and general behaviour in children and adolescents with ADHD. There may be no effects on serious adverse events and quality of life. Methylphenidate may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events considered non-serious, such as sleep problems and decreased appetite. However, the certainty of the evidence for all outcomes is very low and therefore the true magnitude of effects remain unclear. Due to the frequency of non-serious adverse events associated with methylphenidate, the blinding of participants and outcome assessors is particularly challenging. To accommodate this challenge, an active placebo should be sought and utilised. It may be difficult to find such a drug, but identifying a substance that could mimic the easily recognised adverse effects of methylphenidate would avert the unblinding that detrimentally affects current randomised trials. Future systematic reviews should investigate the subgroups of patients with ADHD that may benefit most and least from methylphenidate. This could be done with individual participant data to investigate predictors and modifiers like age, comorbidity, and ADHD subtypes.

Funding

Competing interests

Ole Jakob Storebø: works at Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand Psychiatry, Denmark. He is an Editor for Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems (CDPLP) but was not involved in the editorial process for this review. He is also an Editor‐in‐Chief for the Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology. He has declared that he has no conflicts of interest. Maja Rosenberg Overby Storm: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Johanne Perieira Ribeiro: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Christel‐Mie‐Lykke Huus: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Pernille Darling Rasmussen: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Julie Perrine Schaug: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Henriette Edeman Callesen: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Maria Skoog: has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Camilla Groth works at the Children's Department at Hillerød Hospital, Denmark, where she conducts paediatric clinical research. She has declared that she has no conflicts of interest. Morris Zwi (MZ) is a Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist working part time in private practice; previously, he worked exclusively for the NHS for 32 years, before retiring. He is a former Editor for CDPLP and occasionally is consulted by the group for his expertise; however, he was not involved in the editorial process for this review and it has been over one year since he did any editorial work. MZ declares a payment from the Paediatric Medicines Expert Advisory Board of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency for his attendance at their monthly/bimonthly (i.e. every two months) meetings. Richard Kirubakaran: has declared that he has no conflicts of interest. Erik Simonsen: has declared that he has no conflicts of interest. Christian Gluud: is the Co‐ordinating Editor of the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group. He has declared that he has no conflicts of interest.

PubMed

Methylphenidate treatment for children and teens with ADHD

Abstract

Funding

Competing interests

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

Recent issues from the psychedelic science brief

Abstract

Funding

Competing interests

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

What Lands in Your Inbox Each Week:

Recent issues from the psychedelic science brief