PAM-flexible Cas9-mediated base editing of a hemophilia B mutation in induced pluripotent stem cells

Apr 19, 2023Communications medicine

Flexible Cas9 gene editing fixes a hemophilia B mutation in stem cells

AI simplified

Abstract

with SpCas9-NG successfully converts C to T at a mutation site in induced pluripotent stem cells from a patient with severe hemophilia B.

  • SpCas9-NG demonstrates broad flexibility near the targeted mutation site.
  • The base-editing approach effectively corrects the hemophilia B mutation in patient-derived iPSCs.
  • Gene-corrected iPSCs can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells that express F9 mRNA.
  • SpCas9-NG-mediated base editing restores coagulation factor production in both HEK293 cells and knock-in mice.

AI simplified

Key numbers

Efficiency Increase
efficiency of vs. wild-type SpCas9
84
Gene-corrected
Total colonies with gene correction from patient-derived

Key figures

Fig. 1
Control vs hemophilia B patient-derived : DNA mutation, guide RNA design, Cas9 constructs, and editing efficiency.
Highlights higher DNA cleavage efficiency with SpCas9 and gRNA2 compared to , spotlighting flexibility near the mutation.
43856_2023_286_Fig1_HTML
  • Panel a
    DNA sequencing traces of exon 8 showing the c.947T>C mutation in patient-derived iPSCs compared to healthy control, with the mutated nucleotide highlighted in red.
  • Panel b
    Schematic of three 20-nt guide RNAs targeting sequences near the mutation site, with PAM sequences indicated in red.
  • Panel c
    Diagram of plasmid constructs expressing SpCas9 or SpCas9-NG under CAG promoter and under U6 promoter.
  • Panel d
    gel showing DNA fragments (red arrows) indicating after transduction with SpCas9 or SpCas9-NG and each gRNA; visible cleavage bands appear in SpCas9-NG samples with gRNAs 1 and 3.
  • Panel e
    Bar graph quantifying double-strand break efficiency by next-generation sequencing; SpCas9 with gRNA2 shows highest efficiency (~9%), SpCas9-NG with shows moderate efficiency (~6%), others are lower or not significant.
Fig. 2
efficiency and pluripotency in hemophilia B patient-derived
Highlights higher C to T base-editing efficiency with TAID- and confirms pluripotency in corrected iPSCs.
43856_2023_286_Fig2_HTML
  • Panel a
    Schematic diagrams of plasmid constructs for four base editors combining SpCas9 or SpCas9-NG with BE4 or TAID, showing promoter regions and functional domains.
  • Panel b
    C to T conversion efficiency at the hemophilia B mutation site in iPSCs after transduction with BE4-SpCas9, BE4-SpCas9-NG, TAID-SpCas9, or TAID-SpCas9-NG using gRNA2 or ; TAID-SpCas9-NG with gRNA3 shows the highest conversion efficiency.
  • Panel c
    DNA sequencing chromatograms of exon 8 from patient-derived iPSCs before and after base editing, highlighting the corrected C to T nucleotide change.
  • Panel d
    images showing expression of pluripotency markers OCT4 and NANOG (red) with nuclear stain (blue), and flow cytometry plot showing 99.8% cells positive for SSEA-4 and Tra-1-60 in gene-corrected iPSCs.
  • Panel e
    Hematoxylin-eosin stained sections of tumors derived from gene-corrected iPSCs in mice, confirming differentiation into three germ layers: endoderm (alveolar), mesoderm (cartilage), and exoderm (melanocyte).
Fig. 3
Gene-corrected hemophilia B differentiated into liver cells and transplanted into mice.
Highlights increased liver-specific gene expression and higher protein presence in engrafted tissues after transplantation.
43856_2023_286_Fig3_HTML
  • Panel a
    Schematic timeline of of iPSCs over 25 days followed by transplantation into mouse kidney.
  • Panel b
    Relative of hepatocyte markers AFP, ALB, CYP3A4, HNF4A, and F9 before (day 0) and after (day 25) differentiation; all markers show increased expression at day 25.
  • Panel c
    Photograph of mouse kidney and liver 12 weeks after transplantation; red arrow indicates engrafted tissue at renal subcapsule.
  • Panel d
    Relative mRNA expression of F9 in mouse kidney, gene-corrected undifferentiated iPSCs (before), hepatic lineage-differentiated iPSCs in vitro (day 25), and engrafted tissues in vivo; expression is highest in engrafted tissues.
  • Panel e
    of engrafted tissue showing (blue) for nuclei and FIX protein (red); merged image shows colocalization in kidney tissue.
Fig. 4
Restoration of production in with patient mutations after
Highlights increased FIX activity in edited clones, spotlighting base editing's potential to restore protein function in mutated cells
43856_2023_286_Fig4_HTML
  • Panel a
    Relative levels of FIX in HEK293 cells expressing human cDNA with R338L mutation versus patient cDNA with R338L+I316T mutations; no significant difference observed
  • Panel b
    FIX antigen () levels in supernatant showing significantly higher levels in cells with R338L mutation compared to cells with R338L+I316T mutations
  • Panel c
    FIX activity () in supernatant significantly higher in cells with R338L mutation than in cells with R338L+I316T mutations
  • Panel d
    of intracellular FIX protein (red), Golgi apparatus (green), and nuclei (blue) in HEK293 cells; cells with R338L mutation show visible red FIX signal, while cells with R338L+I316T mutations show reduced red signal
  • Panel e
    Schematic of base editing workflow: transfection of with into HEK293 cells expressing patient cDNA, followed by and FIX activity analysis
  • Panel f
    FIX activity (FIX:C) measured in medium from 137 single-cell clones after base editing; eight clones show increased FIX:C levels
  • Panel g
    cDNA sequencing near mutation site in clones with increased FIX:C; red letters indicate base changes compared to original cells
Fig. 5
Restoration of factor IX production in knock-in mice using with SpCas9 or
Highlights higher factor IX activity and mutation correction frequency in SpCas9-NG treated mice versus controls
43856_2023_286_Fig5_HTML
  • Panel a
    Schematic of the knock-in allele showing human F9 gene insertion with mutations I316T and R338L, including targeting vector and probes
  • Panel b
    Schematic of vectors for intein-mediated split-Cas9 system expressing TAID-SpCas9 or TAID-SpCas9-NG with , and illustration of injection into newborn mice
  • Panel c
    Plasma activity () at 6 weeks post-injection; SpCas9-NG treated mice show visibly higher FIX activity than SpCas9 and no-injection groups
  • Panel d
    Plasma FIX antigen levels () at 6 weeks post-injection; SpCas9-NG treated mice show visibly higher FIX antigen than SpCas9 and no-injection groups
  • Panel e
    Frequency of C to T base conversion at the mutation site in liver DNA; SpCas9-NG treated mice show visibly higher conversion frequency than SpCas9 group
1 / 5

Full Text

What this is

  • via CRISPR-Cas9 offers a method to correct mutations without causing double-strand breaks.
  • This research focuses on using SpCas9-NG, a modified Cas9 with broader flexibility, to address a specific mutation causing hemophilia B.
  • Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were generated from a hemophilia B patient and successfully edited to restore function.
  • The findings suggest potential for personalized treatment of genetic diseases through advanced genome-editing techniques.

Essence

  • SpCas9-NG effectively repairs a hemophilia B mutation in patient-derived iPSCs, restoring coagulation factor production. This approach utilizes broad flexibility, allowing for targeted editing of previously inaccessible mutations.

Key takeaways

  • SpCas9-NG demonstrates broad flexibility, enabling successful of a hemophilia B mutation. This flexibility allows targeting of mutations that wild-type SpCas9 cannot access.
  • Gene-corrected iPSCs differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells and express F9 mRNA after transplantation into mice, indicating potential for functional restoration of coagulation factor.
  • with SpCas9-NG achieves over twofold greater efficiency in correcting the hemophilia B mutation compared to wild-type SpCas9, expanding the range of treatable genetic mutations.

Caveats

  • efficiency for the mutation was lower than in previous studies, possibly due to the complexity of the mutation site. Further optimization of editing tools is necessary.
  • Unexpected C to T conversions near the target site indicate potential off-target effects, requiring careful evaluation before clinical application.
  • The study assessed a mutation from only one patient, necessitating further validation across diverse genetic backgrounds to confirm efficacy.

Definitions

  • Base editing: A genome-editing technology that converts specific DNA bases into others without causing double-strand breaks.
  • PAM (Protospacer Adjacent Motif): A short DNA sequence required for Cas9 to bind and edit target DNA, influencing the range of editable mutations.

AI simplified

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free