Journal of general internal medicine

Comparing Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis

Updated

Abstract

Egger's regression test detected publication bias in 15.7% of meta-analyses of binary outcomes.

  • Seven publication bias tests were compared using 28,655 meta-analyses from the Cochrane Library.
  • Larger meta-analyses showed a greater proportion of statistically significant publication bias tests, especially with Begg's rank test and trim-and-fill method.
  • Agreement among Tang's, Macaskill's, Deeks', and Peters' regression tests for binary outcomes was moderately strong, with most κ's around 0.6.
  • Tang's and Deeks' tests demonstrated very high agreement, with κ > 0.9.
  • Weak to moderate agreement was observed among Begg's rank test, trim-and-fill method, and Egger's regression test, with κ < 0.5.
  • Multiple tests may be necessary for meta-analysts due to the low agreement among the tests.

Simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free