What this is
- CRISPR/SpRY is a genome editing system designed for the yeast Candida albicans.
- It enables targeting of non-NGG protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), expanding the range of editable genomic sites.
- The system was tested on various PAM sequences, showing variable editing efficiencies.
Essence
- CRISPR/SpRY allows efficient genome editing in Candida albicans at non-NGG PAM sites, potentially targeting previously inaccessible genes.
Key takeaways
- CRISPR/SpRY can utilize alternative PAM sequences, enabling genome editing in regions previously untargetable by traditional Cas9.
- Editing efficiency varied among PAM sites, with success rates ranging from less than 1% to 40%, indicating that additional factors influence editing outcomes.
- The system's flexibility in PAM targeting allows for precise modifications in the C. albicans genome, critical for therapeutic development.
Caveats
- Editing efficiency is inconsistent across different PAM sites, which may complicate experimental outcomes.
- The potential for off-target effects has not been thoroughly characterized, raising concerns about the specificity of the CRISPR/SpRY system.
AI simplified
OBSERVATION
Candida albicans is the most prevalent human fungal pathogen. Infections by C. albicans range in severity from uncomfortable rashes to life-threatening invasive candidiasis of which up to 50% of cases are lethal (1–3). Immunocompromised individuals are at an increased risk for invasive candidiasis, and the increased prevalence of antifungal-resistant strains can complicate treatment (4). Further characterization of C. albicans biology is necessary to identify novel therapeutic targets.
Genetic engineering is a powerful tool for elucidating the function of genes and as such can help identify potential therapeutic targets. However, C. albicans is diploid, can undergo chromosome loss and homozygosis, cannot maintain plasmids, and does not have a known meiotic cycle (5–7). Together, these factors reduce the efficiency of traditional genetic engineering techniques in C. albicans.
The development of CRISPR-mediated genome editing for C. albicans has allowed for more efficient manipulation of the genome (8–10). C. albicans CRISPR utilizes a yeast codon-optimized Cas9 that is targeted by a guide RNA to a cDNA sequence to site specifically introduce a double-strand break (8, 11). The break is repaired, and mutations are introduced by homologous recombination with a cotransformed repair template (8). Some methods require that CAS9, the guide RNA, and a selection marker be incorporated into the C. albicans genome, while others transiently express Cas9 and guide RNA, eliminating the need for incorporation of the CRISPR cassette (8, 9).
Although CRISPR/Cas9 has increased the efficiency by which investigators can change the C. albicans genome, it is limited by the requirement for a 5′-NGG-3′ protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) immediately downstream of the guide sequence (12). In bacteria, this PAM site requirement functions to distinguish self from nonself so bacteria do not cleave their own genome (13). However, this requirement during genome editing leaves DNA lacking NGG sequences unavailable for targeting with traditional Cas9. A recent Cas9 variant, designated SpRY, utilizes alternative PAM site sequences in human cells (14). CRISPR/SpRY enables mutation at NRN sequences, where R = A or G, more efficiently than at NYN sequences, where Y = C or T. Building upon this technology, we have developed a CRISPR/SpRY-mediated genome editing system for C. albicans by introducing the mutations from the SpRY variant into the yeast codon-optimized Cas9. We find that CRISPR/SpRY can utilize alternative PAM sites in C. albicans.
Generation of SpRY Cas9 plasmid vectors.
Mutations that encoded the following amino acid changes were introduced via gene synthesis into yeast codon-optimized CAS9; A61R, L1111R, D1135L, S1136W, G1218K, E1219Q, N1317R, A1322R, R1333P, R1335Q, and T1337R (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). Yeast codon-optimized CAS9 was removed from plasmid vectors pV1093, pV1393, and pV1524 via restriction digestion with SmaI and ApaI. The mutated construct was then ligated into cut pV1093, pV1393, and pV1524. Plasmids were verified via sequencing. The resulting plasmids are designated pV1093:SpRY, pV1393:SpRY, and pV1524:SpRY. All subsequent experiments were performed with pV1093:SpRY. pV1093:SpRY, pV1393:SpRY, and pV1524:SpRY are available through Addgene.
Transformation of. C. albicans
Guide RNA primers targeting alternative and classic PAM sites in the 5′ region of C. albicansADE2 were cloned into pV1093 and pV1093:SpRY (8). Vectors were linearized by digestion with KpnI and SacI. Repair templates to introduce premature stop codons into ADE2 were synthesized by primer extension (8). Linearized vector, with or without purified repair template, were transformed into C. albicans SC5314 using lithium acetate transformation (15). Cells were plated on yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) supplemented with 0.27 mM uridine, 1 μg/ml adenine, and 200 μg/ml nourseothricin at 30°C. Plates were imaged after 7 days.
We wanted to test whether pV1093:SpRY could target a variety of PAM sequences (Fig. 1A), and as such, we selected 26 trinucleotide sites spread over a 100-nucleotide stretch of ADE2’s 5′ end. We cloned 26 guides targeting the sequences directly upstream of these trinucleotide sites into pV1093:SpRY (Table 1). Five distinct repair templates encoding premature stop codons and with sufficient homology flanking the intended site of mutation (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material) were generated and cotransformed with the vectors. First, we tested whether pV1093:SpRY could utilize NGG PAM sites. We tested two NGG PAM sites and found that pV1093:SpRY was able to successfully edit the DNA, producing red colonies at one of these sites (Table 1). pV1093:Cas9 was able to edit at both sites and was more efficient than pV1093:SpRY at introducing mutations. Next, we tested whether pV1093:SpRY could target non-NGG PAM sites. Transformation with 9 of the 13 NRN-targeting guides and 9 of the 11 NYN-targeting guides tested resulted in successful editing (Table 1 and Fig. 1B). Wild-type Cas9 could not utilize any of the alternative PAM sites (Fig. 1B). Transformation of pV1093:SpRY without repair templates did not result in any red colonies, indicating that repair template is required for genome editing with pV1093:SpRY. Together, these data indicate that pV1093:SpRY can efficiently edit the C. albicans genome at non-NGG PAM sites.
Editing efficiency was highly variable among PAM sites as the frequency of successful editing ranged from less than 1% up to 40%. Furthermore, identical trinucleotide sequences, found at distinct genomic locations, displayed different editing efficiencies. For example, transformation with guides targeting TAG at base 134 produced red colonies, whereas a TAG at base 26 did not. In addition, the mutation efficiencies at three distinct AGA PAM sites were <1, 5, and 40% (Table 1). These data suggest that editing with pV1093:SpRY is dependent on more than the trinucleotide sequence targeted. As such, trinucleotide sequences we were unable to target in ADE2 may be targetable in other genomic contexts. For example, nucleotides adjacent to the targeted trinucleotide sequence may be important for recognition by SpRY. Additionally, the presence of nucleosomes could inhibit SpRY activity at some sequences.
The variability in editing efficiency at different PAM sites is similar to previous studies which have utilized SpRY. Walton et al. used their system to edit human DNA and found the editing efficiencies to range from 20% to 90% (14). In addition, Xu et al. recently developed a CRISPR/SpRY system for rice and found editing efficiencies range from around 2% to 75% (16). In each system, NRN sequences were targeted with greater affinity than NYN sequences. Further modification of CRISPR/SpRY may lead to more uniform targeting of alternative PAM site sequences.
Here, we describe a CRISPR/SpRY system for C. albicans which does not require an NGG PAM sequence. The C. albicans genome is approximately 33% G/C (17). Traditional Cas9 editing can target 6,341 of 6,466 C. albicans genes at least once (8). The additional PAM site flexibility in our CRISPR/SpRY system has the potential to target genes that traditional Cas9 cannot target. Although off-target effects may be a concern during genome editing, these have not been extensively characterized with CRISPR/SpRY. High-fidelity variants of SpRY have been described which reduce off-target editing in human cells (14). In our experience, editing in C. albicans requires a complementary guide as well as repair template and while we have not extensively tested for off-target effects, changes to guides or the homologous ends of repair templates inhibit genome editing. CRISPR/SpRY will enable investigators to target previously untargetable DNA lacking NGG PAM sites. Such specificity and flexibility can be critical when mutation of a specific residue or region of the genome is required by the investigator.

(A) PAM sites targeted between bases 1 and 150 of. The number after the colon indicates the first nucleotide of the PAM site as measured from the 5′ end of thecoding region. (B) Mutation ofby CRISPR/SpRY and CRISPR/Cas9 at NGG and non-NGG PAM sequences. ADE2 ADE2 C. albicans
| PAM sequence | % red colonies | Coding noncoding strand |
|---|---|---|
| AGA:83 | 40 | Coding |
| GAC:84 | 25 | Coding |
| CAG:121 | 20 | Coding |
| AGA:122 | 5 | Coding |
| ACA:120 | 2 | Coding |
| ACC:85 | 2 | Coding |
| TAG:134 | 2 | Coding |
| CAA:58 | 1 | Noncoding |
| GGT:87 | <1 | Noncoding |
| CGG:88 | <1 | Noncoding |
| TAC:90 | <1 | Noncoding |
| AGA:135 | <1 | Coding |
| AGG:27 | 0 | Coding |
| TAG:26 | 0 | Coding |
| TTA:25 | 0 | Coding |
| TGT:54 | 0 | Coding |
| TTG:53 | 0 | Coding |
| CTC:31 | 0 | Noncoding |
| CCT:29 | 0 | Noncoding |
| CTA:28 | 0 | Noncoding |
| ACA:56 | 0 | Noncoding |
| TGT:122 | 0 | Noncoding |
| CTG:123 | 0 | Noncoding |
| TCT:124 | 0 | Noncoding |
| CGT:139 | 0 | Noncoding |
| TCT:137 | 0 | Noncoding |