What this is
- This research investigates the role of the Drosophila circadian clock gene cycle (cyc) in the development of clock neurons.
- Circadian rhythms are critical for behavioral and physiological processes, and the study focuses on how cyc influences neuronal morphology.
- Findings show that downregulating cyc in specific neurons leads to decreased of axons, affecting the structure and function of these neurons.
Essence
- Downregulating the circadian clock gene cyc in Drosophila clock neurons leads to significant morphological changes, including reduced of axons. This indicates cyc's role beyond circadian timing, influencing neuronal development.
Key takeaways
- Downregulation of cyc in Pdf-expressing neurons results in pronounced defasciculation of sLN projections. This was observed both in larval and adult stages, indicating a developmental role for cyc in shaping clock neuron morphology.
- Knocking down cyc or expressing a dominant negative form during development leads to loss of behavioral rhythms in adult flies. This suggests that cyc is essential for maintaining both structural integrity and functional rhythms in clock neurons.
- The study reveals that Clk downregulation also affects sLN morphology, showing that both core clock genes contribute to the development of these key neuronal pacemakers.
Caveats
- The study relies on genetic manipulations, which may not fully mimic natural gene expression patterns. This could limit the generalizability of the findings.
- Variability in morphological phenotypes among mutant flies suggests that other factors may influence neuronal development, complicating the interpretation of cyc's specific role.
Definitions
- fasciculation: The bundling of axons during neuronal development, crucial for proper neuronal circuit formation.
AI simplified
Introduction
The proper wiring of neuronal circuits during development is essential for the neuronal control of behavior. Across animal species, sleep/wake cycle rhythms, as well as many other behavioral and physiological rhythms, are controlled by the circadian timekeeping system, a network of neurons that maintains endogenous molecular oscillations and rhythmic behavior with a ~24 hour period [1]. The proper functioning of this circadian network requires the formation of synaptic and peptidergic connections during development [2,3].
The Drosophila circadian clock neuron network comprises ~150 neurons and is the functional equivalent of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei, which contain 20,000 neurons in mice [4â6]. All circadian clock neurons contain an intracellular molecular clock consisting of a transcriptional feedback loop of clock genes[7]. CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) are heterodimeric transcriptional activators that directly activate transcription of the period (per) and timeless (tim) genes. PER and TIM encode repressors that inhibit CLK-CYC function. Subsequently, PER and TIM are degraded, which enables the cycle to reinitiate every morning. CLK and CYC also interact with other genes in a secondary circadian loop by activating the genes vrille (vri), and Par domain proteinΔ (Pdp1Δ) [8, 9]. Clk and cyc expression can be detected in almost all clock neurons even before some of these neurons show molecular oscillations [10], suggesting that these genes serve functions that precede the establishment of molecular rhythms.
Drosophila clock neurons are classified into multiple clusters with distinct patterns of gene expression, anatomy, physiology, and synaptic connectivity [5, 6, 11â16]. Among these clusters, the small ventral lateral neurons (sLNvs) are considered the most dominant pacemakers since they are critical for maintaining behavioral rhythmicity under constant darkness and temperature (DD, or free-running) [17â20]. The sLNvs release the neuropeptide Pigment Dispersing Factor (PDF) [21], a key output signal within the clock neuron network [22]. PDF accumulates rhythmically at the sLNv dorsal termini [23] and can be released from both the neurites and soma [24]. Loss of PDF severely reduces the amplitude of the endogenous circadian rhythm and shortens its free-running period in DD [21]. The large LNvs also produce PDF but do not play a role in maintaining rhythms in DD [17].
The projections of the four sLNvs form a bundle and remain fasciculated as they extend from the ventral to the dorsal brain during development. These four projections are usually difficult to distinguish from each other until they begin to defasciculate in the dorsal protocerebrum [25] and extend their dorsal arborizations toward the area where dorsal clusters of clock neurons are located [26]. In adult flies, the dorsal termini of the sLNv projections show rhythmic structural plasticity [27], which relies on daily and circadian rhythms in outgrowth and fasciculation [28â31]. Both Clk and cyc mutants have lower Pdf RNA levels, and the PDF peptide can barely be detected in the sLNv projections [23, 32].
Cyc is a homolog of the mammalian gene Bmal1, although CYC protein levels do not cycle, unlike BMAL1 and several other Drosophila circadian proteins [33]. There is growing evidence for non-circadian functions of BMAL1. First, its downregulation induces apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest in Glioblastoma Stem Cells (GSC), and it was found to preferentially bind metabolic genes and associate with active chromatin regions in GSCs [34]. Second, brain knockdown of Bmal1 using CRISPR/Cas9 made glioblastomas grow at faster rates than controls [35], and similar effects were observed in B16 melanoma cells. Moreover, Bmal1(-/-) mice exhibit defects in short- and long-term memory formation [36] and show reduced lifespan and multiple symptoms of premature aging [37]. Overall, results from studies in different animal models suggest that Bmal1 plays a role in the development of various neurological disorders [38].
The Drosophila sLNvs offer an excellent model for exploring the non-circadian roles of canonical clock genes such as cycle. To determine if the phenotypes previously observed for cyc mutants are specific to PDF expression or involved a broader, non-circadian effect in the development of PDF- expressing cells, we downregulated cyc specifically in the Pdf-expressing cells and observed pronounced defasciculation of the sLNv projections. Similar phenotypes were observed upon expression of a dominant negative form of cyc. Moreover, we found that cyc downregulation in Pdf+ cells during development is sufficient to prevent the fasciculation of the adult sLNvs and results in the loss of behavioral rhythms in adult flies. Manipulations of Clk expression also affect sLNv morphology, although remarkably, the phenotypes of Clk and cyc manipulation differ. Our results show that cyc plays a role in the development of pacemaker neurons, which is likely independent of its role in the circadian molecular oscillator.
Results
downregulation in circadian pacemaker neurons affects the formation of sLNaxon bundles cyc v
Mutations in both Clk and cyc severely reduce pdf RNA and neuropeptide levels [23, 32]. In cyc null mutants, sLNvs projections are often undetectable in larval and adult brains stained with PDF antibodies [23, 39, 40], although around half of the brains show âstuntedâ projections [40]. We observed that cyc null mutants (cyc1) showed a substantial reduction in PDF levels at ZT2, consistent with previous studies, but we also noticed the presence of thin, misrouted sLNv projections in cyc1 flies at higher magnification and intensity (S1A Fig). Upon close observation, PDF could often be detected in the sLNv projections. However, these projections did not form the stereotypical bundle observed in control brains when extending from the anterior medulla toward the dorsal area of the brain.
Because highly defasciculated projections might contribute to the weaker PDF levels observed in cyc1 mutants, we examined the structure of the sLNv projections using a Pdf-RFP transgene, in which a cytosolic Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP) is controlled by the Pdf regulatory sequence [41]. Flies were raised at 28°C throughout development, and experiments were conducted at 28°C in 6â8-day old flies (Fig 1A). In control brains, the projections from the four sLNvs remain fasciculated, forming a bundle until reaching the superior medial protocerebrum (SMP). In contrast, the sLNvs of cyc1 mutants often began to defasciculate in the ventral brain, near their cell bodies (Fig 1B). Some sLNv projections were severely misrouted and did not reach the dorsal brain, extending instead toward the midline or other brain regions. As a result, it was possible to distinguish individual projections from each sLNv even in the ventral brain in most cyc1 mutant brains. This is almost never observed in control brains until the sLNv projections reach the main branching point in the SMP. The morphological phenotypes of cyc1 flies are highly variable, and in some instances the projections are barely visible (S1B Fig).
To test whether the effect of cyc loss on the LNvs is cell-autonomous, we next expressed a UAS-cyc dsRNA transgene (UAS-cycRNAi) using the Pdf-Gal4 driver. We quantified the length of the projections, starting at the point where the projections of the sLNvs intersect with those of the lLNvs (âpoint of originâ, POI, S1C Fig), until the first branching point (âbranching pointâ, BP). This branching point is where the sLNvs ramify and extend their stereotypical arborizations in the dorsal protocerebrum in control brains, and these arborizations show daily, clock-controlled rhythms in their fasciculation and outgrowth [27]. Downregulating cyc in the Pdf-expressing cells significantly decreased the distance to the branching point (Fig 1E). Using a modified Schollâs analysis [42], we quantified the degree of branching in the ventral projections starting at the POI. We observed pronounced defasciculation in the sLNv projections in Pdf > cycRNAi flies (Fig 1F). cyc1 mutants also showed decreased distance to BP and sLNv fasciculation (Fig 1C and 1D). The total projection length in Pdf > cycRNAi flies was not different from that of the controls (Fig 1G), and the defasciculation phenotype was not observed in the contralateral projections that extended from the lLNvs (Fig 1H). Since the lLNvs are born later in development during metamorphosis [25], this result suggests that cyc plays a role in neuronal development during an earlier developmental stage, when the sLNvs begin to extend their projections toward the dorsal brain. These experiments were conducted at 28°C to allow subsequent comparisons with adult-specific and development-specific downregulations of cyc using Gal80ts. Similar results were obtained with flies raised at 25°C (S1FâS1I Fig).
Expression of dominant negative forms of Clk and cyc is an effective strategy for preventing circadian molecular oscillations in specific groups of clock neurons [43â45]. In these dominant negative forms, the DNA binding ability is disrupted while the ability to heterodimerize is preserved [43]. Based on the phenotypes induced by cyc downregulation, we asked if expressing a dominant negative form of cyc in the sLNvs also leads to aberrant projection morphology. We found that sLNvs expressing Î-cyc using Pdf-Gal4 had a significantly shorter distance until the branching point (S2B and S2C Fig) and a greater degree of sLNv projection defasciculation (S2B and S2D Fig), similar to the effects observed in Pdf > cycRNAi flies. The total projection length and the projections of the lLNvs were unaffected (S2E and S2F Fig).
downregulation in circadian pacemaker neurons prevents the formation of sLNs axon bundles. Cyc v Themutant has disrupted sLNmorphology. (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Flies were kept at 28°C throughout development and experiments were performed within days 6â8 post-eclosion. (B) Representative confocal images ofcontrols andexperimental flies stained with anti-RFP (magenta). The branching point (BP) of the dorsal projections is indicated. Scale bar = 25 ÎŒm. Boxes with dashed lines indicate the proximal (1) and distal (2) projections, corresponding to the labeled projection images in the center and right panels, respectively. An unpaired t-test was used to quantify the sLNprojection length until the branching point (BP) (C), and the total number of intersections of the sLNventral projections (D). Results from two independent experiments, with each dot representing one brain. For each genotype, the number of subjects (n) fall in the range: 13 †n †22. (E-H) Quantification of the LNmorphology phenotypes of experimental flies in which atransgene was driven by a;,-;driver compared to the parental controls. The sLNprojection length until the branching point (BP) (E), the total number of intersections of the sLNventral projections (F), the total sLNprojection length (G), and the total number of intersections of the lLNprojections along the optic tract (OT) (H) are shown. Results from three independent experiments, with each dot representing one brain. For each genotype, the n falls in the range: 20 †n †27. For nonparametric data sets, statistical comparisons were done with Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests. For parametric data sets, statistical comparisons were done with one-way ANOVAs followed by Tukey post hoc tests. Differences that are not significant are not indicated. *p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. cyc Pdf-RFP ; Pdf-RFP;cyc cyc Pdf-RFP Pdf Gal4 Tub-Gal80 1 1 RNAi ts v v v v v v v v
PER levels in+ neurons are reduced upon cell-specificknockdown Pdf cyc
CYC activates per transcription, and thus, PER levels in the brain are significantly reduced in cyc mutants [33]. To test whether the phenotypes of cycRNAi expression in the Pdf-expressing neurons are consistent with what would be expected from cyc downregulation, we compared PER levels in the parental control (Pdf-Gal4, Pdf-RFP/+) with those in Pdf > cycRNAi flies at the end of the night (ZT23), when PER nuclear levels are highest [46]. We found that nuclear PER levels in Pdf > cycRNAi flies were significantly reduced in the sLNvs (Fig 2B and 2C) and lLNvs (Fig 2D and 2E). In contrast, PER levels were unaffected in the Dorsal Lateral Neurons (LNds) (Fig 2E and 2G). These results confirmed that, at least in a light-dark cycle (LD), Pdf > cycRNAi flies have lower PER levels in Pdf+ neurons.
cyc null mutant flies have pronounced behavioral phenotypes. Their activity is unimodal instead of bimodal during LD, and they are predominantly nocturnal [47]. Additionally, cyc mutants are largely arrhythmic in DD due to the key role of cyc in circadian molecular oscillations [33]. We conducted behavioral experiments to determine the extent to which downregulating cyc specifically in PDF-expressing neurons recapitulates the phenotype of the cyc mutant. We found that at 28°C, the activity pattern of Pdf > cycRNAi flies was still bimodal in LD (Fig 2H and 2I). However, the majority (~90%) of the experimental flies were arrhythmic in DD (Fig 2J). Pdf > Î-cyc flies showed similar behavioral phenotypes (S2G and S2H Fig), consistent with what was reported for their free-running behavior at 25°C [43].
Constitutivedownregulation in+ cells leads to a reduction in PER levels and arrhythmicity under free-running conditions. cyc Pdf (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Flies were kept at 28°C for their entire lifespan. Experiments were performed within days 6â8 post-eclosion. Dissections were performed at ZT2-3. (B,D,F) Representative confocal images of PER (green) and PDF (magenta) staining in the sLNs (B), lLNs (D), and LNs (F) ofexperimental and/+ control flies (n = 5â6 brains per clock neuron group). All lines also included atransgene. Scale bar = 10 ÎŒm. (C,E,G) Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare nuclear PER intensity levels in the sLNs (C), lLNs (E), and LNs (G) in flies of the indicated genotypes. Differences that are not significant are not indicated. ** p < 0.01. Error bars indicate SEM. (H) Representative actograms of flies of the indicated genotypes under 5 days of LD entrainment followed by 7 days of free-running (DD). To allow comparison with development-specificdownregulation, flies in this experiment were raised at 28°C for their entire lifespan and the experiment was conducted at 28°C. (I) Population activity plots for flies during days 3â5 of the LD cycle at 28°C. (J) Fisherâs exact contingency tests were used to analyze the percentage of rhythmic flies of the indicated genotypes under DD (DD1-7). The driver line also included atransgene. Additional quantifications can be found in. R = Rhythmic and AR = arrhythmic. Differences that are not significant are not indicated. *** p < 0.001. Behavioral data corresponds to two independent behavior experiments. For each genotype: 40 †n †48. v v d v v d Pdf > cyc Pdf-Gal4 Pdf-RFP cyc tub-Gal80 RNAi ts Table 1
acts during development to shape neuronal morphology in adults cyc
To knock down cyc specifically during development, we employed a temperature-sensitive Gal80 (Gal80ts) variant with ubiquitous expression to conditionally inhibit Gal4-mediated expression of the RNAi [48]. This method enables the temporal regulation of UAS transgenes, as Gal80ts remains active at lower temperatures but becomes inactive at higher temperatures. We raised flies at 28°C to allow cyc downregulation during development then transferred them to 18°C immediately after eclosion (Fig 3A). After 1 week at 18°C, the brains were dissected at ZT2 and stained with PDF and RFP antibodies (see methods section). As shown in Fig 3, downregulating cyc exclusively before eclosion resulted in abnormal morphology of the sLNv axonal projections in adult flies (Fig 3B). The phenotypes resembled those observed with constitutive downregulation, with a significantly shorter distance to the branching point (Fig 3B and 3C) and a greater degree of defasciculation compared to parental controls (Fig 3Bâ3D). No significant differences were found in the total projection length or the degree of defasciculation of the lLNvs (Fig 3E and 3F).
A previous study showed that panneuronal rescue of cyc expression in a cyc1 mutant exclusively during development was sufficient to partially rescue arrhythmicity in adult flies [40]. Therefore, we asked if downregulating cyc in the Pdf+ cells specifically during development would lead to behavioral phenotypes similar to those seen in the cyc null mutants. We found that under free-running conditions at 18°C, most (~78%) of the Pdf > cycRNAi flies were arrhythmic (Fig 3Gâ3I). An analysis of PER subcellular localization in DD2 revealed clear cycling with nuclear PER higher at CT2 (Fig 3J). These results indicate that developmental downregulation of cyc specifically in the Pdf+ cells is sufficient to prevent behavioral rhythms in adults.
To determine whether adult-specific cyc knockdown in the Pdf-expressing cells would also lead to morphological phenotypes, we raised flies at 18°C and switched them to 28°C immediately after eclosion (S3A Fig, see the methods section). This manipulation did not result in morphological phenotypes either in terms of the length to the branching point or in the degree of sLNv defasciculation (S3BâS3F Fig). Under free-running 28°C, the majority of the experimental flies were arrhythmic (S3GâS3H Fig), indicating that, as expected, cyc is required in adult clock neurons for proper circadian clock function.
Development-specificdownregulation in+ cells prevents sLNfasciculation. cyc Pdf v (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Flies were raised in LD at 28°C, and transferred to 18°C immediately after eclosion. Dissections were then performed in 6â8 day old adults at ZT2-3. (B) Representative confocal images of anti-PDF (green) and anti-RFP (magenta) staining of adult fly brains in whichwas downregulated only during development. Each line also included atransgene. The white arrow indicates the increased defasciculation in the sLNv projections in experimental flies. Scale bar = 50 ÎŒm. (C-F) Quantification of the LNmorphology phenotypes of flies of the indicated genotypes. The driver line also included atransgene. The sLNprojection length until the branching point (BP) (C), the number of intersections of sLNventral projections (D), the total sLNprojection length (E), and the total number of intersections of the lLNprojections along the optic tract (OT) (F) are shown for flies in whichwas downregulated in+ cells until eclosion. Two independent experiments were conducted. For each genotype: 11 †n †16. One-way ANOVA tests were used to quantify the LNmorphology. *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. Each dot corresponds to one brain. (G-I). Behavioral phenotypes of development-specificknockdown. Flies were raised in LD at 28°C, before being transferred to 18°C upon eclosion. Experiments were conducted at 18°C. (G) Representative actograms of flies of the indicated genotypes under free-running (seefor n and additional quantifications). (H) Population activity plots for flies during days 3â5 of the LD cycle at 18°C. (I) Percent rhythmicity for the indicated genotypes under DD. R = Rhythmic and AR = arrhythmic. Fisherâs exact contingency tests were used to analyze the percentage of rhythmic flies under DD (DD1-7). *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. The data correspond to three independent behavior experiments. For each genotype: 68 †n †94. (J) Quantification of nuclear over cytoplasmic PER immunosignal within the sLNs on day 2 of constant darkness at 18°C from brains of Gal4 controls orRNAi-expressing flies. A two-way ANOVA was employed for statistical analysis. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. cyc Pdf-RFP tub-Gal80 cyc Pdf cyc cyc v v v v v v v ts Table 1
manipulations lead to aberrant sLNprojections in larval clock neurons Cyc v
Next, we asked if cyc downregulation results in clock neuron morphology phenotypes during earlier developmental stages. The four larval sLNvs, which modulate the sensitivity of larvae to light and mediate a circadian rhythm in visual sensitivity [49], appear to be identical in their anatomy and synaptic connections [50]. We expressed the cycRNAi transgene under the Pdf-Gal4 driver and dissected third larval instar (L3) brains (Fig 4). In brains of experimental larvae the length to the branching point did not differ from that of the controls (Fig 4B and 4C), but the degree of dorsal termini branching was significantly higher (Fig 4Bâ4D). This quantification is similar to that previously described when quantifying the arborization of the dorsal projections sLNvs in adults [27], where the concentric circles are centered at the main dorsal branching point (S1B Fig; see methods section). The total sLNv projection length was not affected by the genetic manipulation (Fig 4E).
Since the effects of cyc knockdown via RNAi and the expression of a cyc dominant negative form in adults were similar (Figs 1 and S2), we analyzed the morphology of the sLNv projections in L3 larvae upon Î-cyc expression. In Pdf > Î-cyc larval brains, the length to the branching point was significantly lower (Fig 4F and 4G) and the number of branches was significantly greater than that of controls (Fig 4H). The total projection length was not affected (Fig 4I). Taken together, these results suggest that cyc plays a role in the development of the larval sLNv neurons.
manipulations lead to aberrant sLNprojections in larval clock neurons. Cyc v (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Larvae were raised in LD at 28°C. Third instar larvae (L3) were dissected at ZT2-3. (B-E) Developmental effects ofknockdown in the sLNs. (B) Representative confocal images of L3 larval brains stained with anti-RFP, labeling the sLNs. (C-E) The projection length from the POI to the BP (C), the degree of sLNdorsal termini branching (D), and the total projection length (E) were compared. For each genotype: 13 †n †17. (F-I) Developmental effects of expressing a dominant-negative form of,, in the larval sLNs. (F) Representative confocal images of anti-RFP staining in the sLNs of L3 larvae. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukeyâs Multiple Comparisons tests was used to compare the projection length from the POI to the BP (G). A Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests compared the nonparametric data sets: the degree of sLNdorsal termini branching (H) and the total projection length (I). Each dot corresponds to one brain. For each genotype: 9 †n †20. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Three independent experiments were conducted for each genetic manipulation and each line also included atransgene. The driver lines also included atransgene. Error bars indicate SEM. cyc cyc Î-cyc Pdf-RFP tub-Gal80 v v v v v v ts
downregulation increases sLNv dorsal arborizations Clk
Clk and cyc mutations produce similar effects on the expression pattern of PDF in adult brains [23]. CLK and CYC act as heterodimeric transcriptional activators, and the circadian phenotypes associated with mutations in these core circadian clock genes, both molecular and behavioral, are largely similar [43, 47, 51]. To determine if downregulating Clk in the sLNvs leads to the same defasciculation of the sLNvs observed with cyc manipulations, we performed similar experiments as those described above, in which we expressed ClkRNAi in Pdf+ neurons. We found that Pdf > ClkRNAi flies also showed neuronal morphology phenotypes (Fig 5).
In a previous study, Clk downregulation resulted in overfasciculation of the sLNv dorsal termini when stained with anti-PDF [52]. However, RFP labeling of the sLNv membrane indicated that these termini were actually more expanded than those of control flies, resulting in significantly higher dorsal termini branching (Figs 5Bâ5E and S1C). In Pdf > ClkRNAi flies, neither the distance to the branching point (Fig 5C) nor the degree of defasciculation differed from controls (Fig 5D). Neither the sLNv total projection length nor the lLNv projections were affected (S4C and S4D Fig). Only ~48% of the Pdf > ClkRNAi flies were rhythmic, and those that were rhythmic exhibited a lengthening of the free-running period (S4B Fig and Table 1). Nuclear PER levels in Pdf > ClkRNAi flies were significantly reduced in the LNvs (S4HâS4J Fig).
Expression of Î-Clk in the Pdf+ cells did not result in changes in the sLNv projection length until branching point (Fig 5F and 5G) or the total length of the projections (S4F Fig). However, the Pdf > Î-Clk brains had increased defasciculation of the ventral projection (Fig 5H). The degree of dorsal termini branching in the Pdf > Î-Clk flies was not significant (Fig 5I), not was the degreed of lLNv defasciculation (S4G Fig). Under DD at 28°C, the majority of Î-Clk expressing flies were arrhythmic (S4E Fig), consistent with what was reported at 25°C [43].
We then examined L3 larval brains to determine if the observed phenotypes were already present at this developmental stage. While expression of ClkRNAi did not result in morphological phenotypes in larval LNvs (S5 Fig), expression of Î-Clk resulted in pronounced phenotypes (Fig 6A and 6B). We observed a significant increase in sLNv dorsal termini branching (Fig 6D) and total projection length (Fig 6E) in Pdf > Î-Clk larvae. The length to the branching point for the experimental larvae was not significantly different from that of the control lines (Fig 6C). Expressing Î-Clk led to more pronounced phenotypes in the larval stage than Clk downregulation, possibly due to incomplete knockdown.
In addition to the main feedback loop, CLK and CYC form a secondary loop by activating vri and Pdp1Δ [8, 9], which repress and activate Clk expression, respectively. The low PDF peptide in the sLNvs projections of cyc1 mutants can be rescued by vri overexpression [39]. To determine if vri expression also affects sLNvs morphology we expressed a line with a CRISPR/Cas9-based gRNA targeting the vri gene [53] under the control of the Pdf-Gal4 driver. We found that in Pdf > Cas9 + vri-g flies neither the distance until branching point in the s-LNvs (Fig 7B and 7C) nor the degree of fasciculation of the s-LNvs (Fig 7D) was different from controls. The total projection length was significantly higher than controls (Fig 7E), but in this case due to projections extending ventrally towards the optic tract (Fig 7B). In the majority of the brains, some s-LNv projections extended towards the ventral brain after reaching the SMP (Fig 7B) and in most cases contacted the l-LNv contralateral projections in the optic tract (Fig 7F and 7G), a phenotype that was never observed in control brains.
andmanipulations result in different morphology phenotypes in clock neurons. Clk cyc (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Flies were kept in LD conditions at 28°C for their entire lifespan. Dissections were performed within Days 6â8 post-eclosion at ZT2-3. (B) Representative confocal images of anti-RFP staining in the sLNs adult brains of control (+ and+), and experimental (>) flies. White arrows indicate the BP (left) and extension of some of the sLNdorsal projections (right) in the experimental line. All lines employed also included atransgene. Scale bar = 25 ÎŒm. (C-E) Quantification of sLNmorphology using Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests for nonparametric datasets, compared the length until the branching point (C) and the total number of axonal crosses of the sLNs (D). For parametric data, ordinary one-way ANOVA tests followed by Tukeyâs Multiple Comparisons tests compared the total number of axonal crosses after the BP (E). Each dot corresponds to one brain. Two independent experiments were conducted. For each genotype: 16 †n †22. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. (F) Representative confocal images of anti-RFP (magenta) staining in the sLNs adult brains of control (+ and+), and experimental (>) flies. White arrows indicate the BP (top) and increased defasciculation along the sLNprojections (bottom). All lines employed also included atransgene. Scale bar = 25 ÎŒm. (G-I) Quantification of sLNmorphology phenotypes: length until the branching point (G), the total number of axonal crosses of the sLNs (H), and the total number of axonal crosses after the BP (I). For parametric data, ordinary one-way ANOVA tests followed by Tukeyâs Multiple Comparisons tests were employed. For nonparametric data, Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests were employed. Seefor details about statistical analysis. Each dot corresponds to one brain. Two independent experiments were conducted. For each genotype: 17 †n †22. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. v v v v v v v v Clk / Pdf-Gal4;tub-Gal80 / Pdf Clk Pdf-RFP UAS-ÎClk / Pdf-Gal4;tub-Gal80 / Pdf Î-Clk Pdf-RFP RNAi ts RNAi ts S1 Table
Expressingin the sLNs leads to axonal morphology phenotypes in L3 larvae. Î-Clk v (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Larvae were raised in LD at 28°C. Third instar larvae (L3) were dissected at ZT2-3. (B) Representative confocal images of anti-RFP (magenta) staining in the sLNs whenwas expressed in+ neurons in L3 larvae. Each line also included atransgene, and the driver line also included atransgene. White arrows indicate misrouting of the sLNprojections in the experimental line. Scale bar = 25 ÎŒm. For nonparametric data, Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests were used to compare the length to the BP (C). One way ANOVA tests were used to compare dorsal termini branching (D) and the total projection length (E). Two independent experiments were conducted. Each dot corresponds to one brain. For each genotype: 12 †n †14. *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. v v Î-Clk Pdf Pdf-RFP tub-Gal80 ts
mutagenesis results in sLNhyperextension. Vri v (A) Representative timeline of the experiments in the figure. Flies were kept in LD conditions at 28°C for their entire lifespan. Dissections were performed in 6â8 day old adults at ZT2-3. Behavioral experiments were run at constant 28°C. (B) Representative confocal images of anti-RFP (magenta) staining in the sLNs adult brains of control (+ and+), and experimental (>) flies. All lines employed also included atransgene. White arrows indicate the misrouting of the sLNdorsal projections (top), and the intersection of the sLNwith the lLNs at the OT (bottom). Scale bar = 25 ÎŒm. (C-E) Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Dunnâs multiple comparisons tests were used to compare the length until the branching point (C), the total number of intersections of the sLNs ventral projections (D), and the longest path of the sLNprojections (without including misrouting) (E). (F) Fisherâs exact contingency tests were used to analyze the percentage of brains where the sLNs intersected with the lLNs at the optic tract (I = Intersecting, N.I. = Not Intersecting). Seefor additional quantifications. Each dot corresponds to one brain. Two independent experiments were conducted. For each genotype: 7 †n †12. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. v v v v v v v v cas9;vrig\/ Pdf-Gal4;tub-Gal80 / Pdf cas9;vrig Pdf-RFP ts Table 1
| Temperature pre-eclosion: 28°C, Temperature post-eclosion: 28°C | ||||
| Genotype | Number ofFlies (n) | %Rhythmicity (nR) | Period (h) ±SEM | Rhythmic Power ± SEM |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80ts | 40 | 97.50 (39) | 24.44 ± 0.06 | 109.80 ± 6.39 |
| ;;UAS-cycRNAi 42563 | 48 | 85.42 (41) | 24.02 ± 0.08 | 85.74 ± 7.91 |
| ,>;;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-cyctsRNAi 42563 | 40 | 10.00 (4) | 25.88 ± 3.03 | 24.32 ± 3.71 |
| ;;UAS-ClkRNAi 42566 | 26 | 92.31 (24) | 23.73 ± 0.10 | 97.66 ± 8.90 |
| ,>;;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-ClktsRNAi 42566 | 21 | 52.38 (11) | 25.36 ± 0.22 | 36.74 ± 6.76 |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80ts | 24 | 100.00 (24) | 24.5 ± 0.07 | 101.40 ± 8.97 |
| ;UAS-cas9/CyO; UAS-Vrig/TM6b Tb | 16 | 87.50 (14) | 23.86 ± 0.11 | 124.6 ± 10.39 |
| ,>;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-cas9/CyO;UAS-Vrig/TM6b Tbts | 18 | 38.89 (7) | 23.50 ± 0.15 | 29.02 ± 3.68 |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80ts | 31 | 83.87 (26) | 24.98 ± 0.07 | 56.76 ± 6.73 |
| ;UAS-Îcyc; | 24 | 95.83 (23) | 23.54 ± 0.08 | 72.79 ± 9.29 |
| ,>;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-Îcyc;ts | 32 | 3.13 (1) | 25.50 ± 0.00 | 13.66 ± 0.00 |
| ;UAS-ÎClk | 27 | 100.00 (27) | 23.52 ± 0.06 | 93.52 ± 8.71 |
| ,>;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-ÎClkts | 28 | 3.57 (1) | 23.50 ± 0.00 | 17.18 ± 0.00 |
| Temperature pre-eclosion: 28°C, Temperature post-eclosion: 18°C | ||||
| Genotype | Number ofFlies (n) | %Rhythmicity (nR) | Period (h) ±SEM | Rhythmic Power ± SEM |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80ts | 68 | 88.24 (60) | 24.40 ± 0.17 | 87.80 ± 7.33 |
| ;;UAS-cycRNAi 42563 | 94 | 93.62 (88) | 24.18 ± 0.04 | 81.06 ± 4.38 |
| ,>;;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-cyctsRNAi 42563 | 70 | 27.14 (19) | 23.82 ± 0.81 | 21.42 ± 1.78 |
| Temperature pre-eclosion: 18°C, Temperature post-eclosion: 28°C | ||||
| Genotype | Number ofFlies (n) | %Rhythmicity (nR) | Period (h) ±SEM | Rhythmic Power ± SEM |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80ts | 30 | 100 (30) | 24.93 ± 0.04 | 127.8 ± 6.76 |
| ;;UAS-cycRNAi 42563 | 25 | 96 (24) | 24.04 ± 0.07 | 150.1 ± 12.44 |
| ,>;;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;Tub-Gal80; UAS-cyctsRNAi 42563 | 31 | 38.71 (12) | 23.67 ± 0.61 | 24.27 ± 3.68 |
| Temperature pre-eclosion: 25°C, Temperature post-eclosion: 25°C | ||||
| Genotype | Number ofFlies (n) | %Rhythmicity (nR) | Period (h) ±SEM | Rhythmic Power ± SEM |
| ,;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4; | 29 | 89.66 (26) | 24.52 ± 0.08 | 152.2 ± 11.53 |
| ;UAS-cycRNAi 42563; | 31 | 83.87 (26) | 24.06 ± 0.08 | 95.44 ± 9.61 |
| ,>;;Pdf-RedPdf-Gal4;; UAS-cycRNAi 42563 | 31 | 12.90 (4) | 23.13 ± 0.24 | 21.55 ± 6.93 |
Discussion
Our results reveal a role for the circadian clock gene cyc in establishing the proper cellular morphology of the key clock pacemaker neurons, the sLNvs. Both constitutive cyc knockdown or expression of a dominant negative form of cyc in Pdf+ cells result in increased defasciculation of the sLNvs. In addition, Clk downregulation and expression of a dominant negative form of Clk also result in sLNv morphology phenotypes, although some of those phenotypes appear to be distinct from those caused by cyc manipulations. Expressing the dominant-negative forms of either Clk or cyc has been used in previous studies as an effective way to prevent molecular oscillations in subsets of clock neurons. However, our results indicate that these genetic manipulations lead to additional morphological phenotypes beyond molecular timekeeping that are already detectable during the larval stages.
In addition to anatomical and functional classifications, clock neurons can be divided into early or late developmental groups depending on when circadian oscillations can be detected. In the early groups, which include the sLNvs, per and tim expression rhythms can be detected at the first instar (L1) larval stage, whereas in the late groups, such rhythms cannot be detected until metamorphosis [25, 54]. However, cyc and Clk expression using GFP-cyc and GFP-Clk transgenes can be detected in almost all groups of clock neurons at early developmental stages, even days before per oscillations begin [10]. This suggests that cyc and Clk play additional roles in the development of clock neurons beyond their role in the molecular oscillator.
Both cyc and Clk modulate PDF expression in both larval and adult clock neurons. In Clkjrk mutants, neither PDF nor Pdf mRNA can be detected in most larval [32] or adult sLNvs [23], and similar effects have been observed for the cyc2 mutant [23]. However, around half of the cyc1 brains stained with PDF exhibit âstuntedâ sLNv projections which appear to lack their dorsal termini [40]. This study by Goda et al. also showed that panneuronal rescue of cyc expression throughout development is sufficient to restore PDF expression in the LNv dorsal projections of cyc1 mutants [40]. Overexpression of vri, a clock gene that is downstream of CLK/CYC and acts as a repressor of CLK transcription [9, 32], causes a severe reduction in PDF levels in larval brains [32], and the low PDF levels in the sLNvs of cyc1 mutants can be rescued by vri overexpression [39]. However, restoring PDF expression in the sLNvs in flies lacking vri expression is not sufficient to rescue activity rhythms.
Unlike in cyc and Clk mutants [23], PDF can be detected in the sLNvs projections in per1 and tim1 mutants, although it no longer shows rhythms in its accumulation in the dorsal termini [23]. In addition, structural plasticity rhythms in the sLNvs are absent in both per1 and tim1 mutants [27]. Downregulation of Clk [52], expression of Î-cyc [30], and overexpression of vri in Pdf-expressing cells [39] also result in impaired plasticity rhythms [55]. Although the anatomical phenotypes seen in these mutants are milder than those that observed when cyc and Clk are downregulated or when their dominant negative forms are expressed, the sLNv projections of both per and tim null mutants also exhibit altered morphology [27].
Our results suggest that Clk and cyc manipulations produce different phenotypes, however, it is possible that this is partially due to a less effective knockdown of Clk. Behavioral experiments show that cyc knockdown in Pdf+ neurons result in a larger fraction of arrhythmic flies than knockdown of Clk (Table 1). Use of RNAi often reduces gene expression but does not completely eliminate it, and may lead to off-target side effects. In addition, RNAi efficiency may vary over time. Expression of dominant negative alleles was used as an independent approach, but this method has limitations as well: over-expression levels for cyc and Clk may differ, and non-native molecular interactions may occur at high concentrations. However, differential effects of cyc and Clk mutations have been previously described: cyc1 and Clkjrk mutants showed differences in their sleep consolidation during the day and in their ability to recover after sleep deprivation [47].
CYC/CLK may regulate neuronal fasciculation by modulating the expression of genes involved in cell migration or cytoskeletal dynamics. For example, increasing matrix metalloproteinases 1 (MMP1) expression reduces the complexity of the sLNv arborizations along the projections [31]. MMP1 promotes fasciculation in Drosophila motor neuron axons [56]. Clk has been shown to affect sLNv dorsal termini arborization through the activation of Mef2, which negative regulates Fas2 expression [52]. Our results from Clk downregulation show increased rather than decreased sLNv dorsal termini arborization. One important difference is that we used RFP to label the membrane rather than a PDF staining. As for cyc, among the sLNv morphology phenotypes reported in the literature, including those of other clock mutants, PDF/PDFR [57], and Rho GTPases [28], among others, the phenotype most similar to cyc downregulation is the downregulation of the Medea (Med). Med is homolog of the human tumor-suppressor gene DPC4 and is involved in the decapentaplegic (dpp) pathway [58], and its downregulation via RNAi in Pdf+ neurons results in decreased fasciculation along the projections of the sLNvs [57]. In addition, similar to cyc manipulations, developmental specific downregulation of Med leads to morphology phenotypes in adult clock neurons [57].
Expression of Clk outside the clock network leads to the generation of ectopic clocks [59], but they require cyc expression. A study by Liu et al. showed that Clk stabilizes CYC both in cultured Drosophila Schneider 2 (S2) cells and in vivo: upon ectopic Clk expression, GFP-CYC can be detected in additional cells beyond the clock neuron network, suggesting that although with this reporter the CYC protein could be detected in the brain only in clock neurons, cyc mRNA is more broadly expressed [60]. In addition, cyc mRNA was not enriched in the LNvs compared to other elav-expressing neurons in the head [61]. Single cell RNA sequencing data revealed that cyc mRNA is present in non-clock neurons as well as in various tissues throughout the flyâs body, with particularly high expression in the gut, ovaries, and testes [62]. In some instances, cyc mRNA expression levels are very high while Clk mRNA levels are low, such as in intestinal stem cells and the chordotonal organ [62]. The role of cyc mRNA expression in non-clock cells remains unknown. An interesting question for future studies is whether CLK and CYC act as an obligate heterodimer in their neurodevelopmental function and other possible non-circadian roles. In mammals, BMAL1 can dimerize with NPAS2 in addition to CLOCK [63], and a recent study in Drosophila detected co-binding of CYC and FOXO in the promoter region of vrille [64]. Single seq RNA sequencing in the sLNvs and other clock neurons, comparing the effects of cyc vs Clk downregulation, could help clarify the degree to which they function independently. Our results suggest that Clk and cyc are involved in shaping the morphology of clock neurons, and it is possible that they play similar roles in non-clock neurons as well.
Materials and Methods
Fly lines and rearing
Flies were raised on cornmeal-sucrose yeast media in a Percival Incubator under 12:12 LD at different temperature conditions. Depending on the experiment, flies were raised under either 18°C, 25°C, or 28°C (indicated in the figure legends). The lines UAS-cycRNAi (BDSC #42563), UAS-ClkRNAi (BDSC #42566), w1118 (BDSC #3605) and CS (BDSC #64349) were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. The lines Pdf-RFP,Pdf-Gal4;Tub-gal80ts and w;Pdf-RFP;MKRS/TM6 were donated by Justin Blau (New York University). The cyc1, UAS-Î-cyc, and UAS-Î-Clk stocks were donated by Paul Hardin (University of Texas).
Immunohistochemistry
LNPDF levels and neuronal morphology v
Brains of 6â8-day-old adult males or L3 larvae were dissected between ZT2 and ZT3 in ice-cold Schneiderâs Drosophila Medium (S2) (Thermo Fisher, #21720024). They were fixed immediately after dissection in 2% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) in S2 for 30 minutes. Brains were then treated with blocking solution (5% goat serum in 0.3% PBS-Tx) for 1 hour at room temperature followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4°C for 24â48 hr. The primary antibodies used were 1:3000 mouse anti-PDF (Developmental Hybridoma Bank) and 1:1000 rabbit anti-RFP (Rockland, #600-401-379-RTU). After incubation, the brains were rinsed 6 times in 0.3% PBS + Triton X-100 (PBT), after which they were incubated with Alexa-fluor conjugated secondary antibodies for 24-hr at 4°C. The secondary antibodies used were 1:3000 Alexa-488 (Thermo Fisher, #A11029) and 1:1000 Alexa-568 (Thermo Fisher, #A11036). The brain samples were further washed 6 times with 0.3% PBT, cleaned and mounted on a clean glass slide in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, #H-1000-10) mounting media. A list of reagents can be found on Table 2.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains | ||
| ,w;Pdf-RFPPdf-Gal4;Tub-gal80ts | J. Blau, NYU | |
| w;Pdf-RFP;MKRS/TM6 | J. Blau, NYU | |
| ;UAS-ÎClk #1 | J. Blau, NYU | |
| W;UAS-cas9/CyO;UAS-Vrig;TM6b Tb | M.Rosbash, Brandeis | |
| w;;UAS-cycRNAi42563 | BloomingtonStock CenterDrosophila | BDSC 42563 |
| w;;UAS-ClkRNAi 42566 | BloomingtonStock CenterDrosophila | BDSC 42566 |
| w;+;+1118 | BloomingtonStock CenterDrosophila | BDSC 3605 |
| Canton-S | BloomingtonStock CenterDrosophila | BDSC 64349 |
| cyc1 | P. Hardin, University of Texas | BDSC 80929 |
| ;UAS-Îcyc; | P. Hardin, University of Texas | |
| ;UAS-ÎClk | P. Hardin, University of Texas; BloomingtonStock CenterDrosophila | BDSC 3618 |
| Antibodies | ||
| Rabbi anti-RFP (1:1000) | Rockland | #600-401-379-RTU |
| Mouse anti-PDF (1:3000) | Developmental Hybridoma Bank | |
| Rat anti-PER (1:500) | O. Shafer (ASRC CUNY) | |
| Anti-rabbit Alexa-568 (1:1000) | Thermo Fisher | A11036 |
| Donkey anti-rat Alexa-488 (1:500) | Thermo Fisher | A21208 |
| Anti-mouse Alexa-488 (1:3000) | Thermo Fisher | A11029 |
| Software | ||
| Fiji | http://fiji.sc | RRID: SCR_002285 |
| MATLAB R2022b | MathWorks, Natick | RRID: SCR_001622 |
| GraphPad Prism 9.0 | GraphPad Software | RRID: SCR_002798 |
| DAM FileScan | Trikinetics | |
| ClockLab | Actimetrics | RRID:SCR_014309 |
| Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins | ||
| Vectashield Mounting Medium | Vector Laboratories | #H-1000-10 |
| Premix PBS Buffer (10x) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# 11666789001 |
| 2% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) | Sigma-Aldrich | 47608-250ML-F |
| Triton- X-100 | Bio Basic | CAS#9002-93-1 |
| SchneiderâsMedium (S2)Drosophila | Thermo Fisher | 21720024 |
| Other | ||
| DAM2Activity MonitorsDrosophila | Trikinetics | |
| DAM Drosophila Environmental Monitors | Trikinetics | |
PER Staining
Brains of 6â8-day-old males were dissected one hour before lights-on (ZT23) in ice-cold Schneiderâs Drosophila Medium (S2) (Thermo Fisher, #21720024). Immediately after dissection, brains were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 minutes, stained and mounted as described above. The primary antibodies used were 1:1000 rabbit anti-RFP (Rockland, #600-401-379-RTU) and 1:500 rat anti-PER (donated by Orie Shafer). The secondary antibodies used were 1:1000 Alexa-568 (Thermo Fisher, #A11036) and 1:500 Alexa-488 (Thermo Fisher, #A21208).
For the analysis of PER subcellular localization (Fig 3J), flies were raised at 28C under LD and transferred to 18°C immediately after eclosion. After 5 days under LD 18C, flies were transferred to constant darkness at 18°C and brains were dissected on the second day of DD (DD2).
Imaging, quantification, and statistical analysis
All images were acquired on an Olympus Fluoview 1000 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a 40x/1.10 NA FUMFL N objective (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) at the Advanced Science Research Center (ASRC-CUNY). For all the experiments, only one hemisphere per brain was imaged (the right hemisphere, unless it was damaged, in which case we imaged the left hemisphere).
Quantification of adult LNvmorphology (sLNvand lLNv): We quantified 1) sLNv total projection length, 2) sLNv length from the point of origin (POI) until the branching point (BP) (âlength until BPâ), 3) the degree of defasciculation of the sLNv ventral projections, 4) the sLNv dorsal termini branching, 5) the degree of defasciculation of the l-LNv projections, and 6) intersections between sLNv projections and lLNv projections along the optic tract.
1-Total projection length: The total length of the dorsal projection was determined by a line drawn from the point of intersection (POI) between the sLNvs and the optic tract until the end of the dorsal termini. If the projection length went past the midline of the brain, the length was measured up to the midline.
2-Length until BP: The partial length of the dorsal projections was determined by a line drawn from the POI until the BP of the sLNvs at the dorsal termini. The projection length and partial projection length of the sLNvs were quantified using Fiji in ImageJ.
3- Defasciculation of the sLNvventral projections (âsLNvDefasciculationâ): A modified Schollâs analysis [42], was used to analyze the degree of defasciculation of the ventral area of the sLNv projections, near the cell bodies. Six concentric circles, each 25 ÎŒm apart, were placed centered in the POI (S1C Fig). Each intersection between an individual ventral projection and any of the 6 circles was counted. A value of â10â denotes 10 total intersections between any of the projections and any of the circles.
4-sLNv Dorsal termini branching: A modified Schollâs analysis was used to analyze the degree of defasciculation of the dorsal termini of the sLNv projections. This method is similar to what was previously described to quantify sLNv dorsal termini [27]. In this study, 8 concentric circles, each 12.5 um apart, were centered in the BP (S1E Fig). Each intersection between an individual dorsal projection and any of the 8 circles was counted. A value of â10â denotes 10 total intersections between any of the dorsal projections and any of the circles.
5-Defasciculation of the lLNvoptic tract projections. The degree of defasciculation of the lLNvs was determined using the same 6 concentric circles centered in the POI what were used to quantify defasciculation of the sLNv ventral projections (2) (S1C Fig). Each intersection between an individual lLNv projection and any of the 6 circles was counted.
6- Intersections between sLNvprojections and lLNv projections along the optic tract. We quantified the percentage of brains in which at least one sLNv dorsal projection turned ventrally and extended towards the optic tract, contacting at least one lLNv projection. This phenotype was not observed in brains of control flies but was present in more than half of the brains of flies in which vri was knocked out (shown in Fig 7F).
Quantification of larval sLNmorphology v
We quantified the total projection length of the sLNvs, the axonal projection length until the branching point of the and the degree of branching in the sLNv dorsal projections (S1D Fig). The projection length, partial projection length, and area of the sLNvs were quantified using Fiji. The projection length was measured by a line drawn from a determined first point of intersection (POI) of each of the sLNv cell bodies until the end of the dorsal termini. The partial length of the axonal projections was determined by a line drawn for the same point of intersection until the branching point (BP) of the sLNvs at the dorsal termini. A modified Schollâs analysis was used to measure the branching of the sLNv projections. Six concentric circles were placed around the same branching point used in the length measurements. The concentric circles were each 12.5 ÎŒm away from each other, so that the farthest circle was 75 ÎŒm away from the POI. The number of visible neurites of the sLNvs that intersected with each circle were counted and summed, yielding the total number of intersecting neurons for the dorsal projections.
Quantification of PER levels
Single optical sections of either sLNvs, lLNvs or LNds were imaged using the same settings using a 40x/1.10 objective. PDF was used to identify the small and large LNvs. The LNds were identified based on their localization, size, and morphology. PER levels were determined through normalization of nuclear staining within each cell to the background. The average value for each brain within a cluster was computed by averaging the values obtained from multiple cells within that cluster. Quantification was performed using images from 5â6 brains per each cluster at each timepoint. For the analysis of PER subcellular localization (Fig 3J), the ratio of nuclear vs cytoplasmic PER levels was determined for individual sLNvs and compared using a two-way ANOVA.
Locomotor activity rhythm recording and analysis
DAM2 Drosophila Activity Monitors (TriKinetics, Waltham, MA) were used to record the locomotor activity rhythms of adult male flies aged three- to five-days, as previously described [65]. Flies were entrained to 12:12 LD cycles for at least five days, and then transferred to constant darkness (DD) for at least eight days at a constant temperature of 28°C, unless otherwise specified. Free-running activity rhythms were analyzed with ClockLab software from Actimetrics (Wilmette, IL). We employed ClockLabâs Ï-square periodogram function, which was integrated into ClockLab software, for the analysis of rhythmicity, rhythmic power, and free-running period in individual flies, using a confidence level of 0.01 [33]. For each of the tested genotypes, only significant periodicities falling within the 14 to 34-hour range were taken into consideration. In instances where an individual fly exhibited multiple periodicities with peaks surpassing the significance threshold, only the period with the highest amplitude was utilized when calculating the average periods presented in Table 1. ClockLab assigns each peak in the Ï-square periodogram both a "Power" value and a "Significance" value. The "Rhythmic Power" for each designated rhythmic fly was determined by subtracting the "Significance" value from the "Power" value associated with the predominant peak. Flies that did not exhibit a periodicity peak above the threshold (10) were categorized as "arrhythmic," and their period and rhythmic power were not included in the analysis [65].
Statistical analysis
Pearsonâs DâAgostino normality tests were performed for all the datasets. Depending on whether the data were normally distributed, statistical analyses were performed using either a one-way ANOVA with a Tukeyâs multiple comparisons test or a Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunnâs multiple comparisons test for 3 or more groups, or a t-test for comparisons between 2 groups. Fisherâs exact contingency tests were run to analyze the percent rhythmicity for the indicated genotypes under DD.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Justin Blau and Paul Hardin for their valuable feedback on various aspects of this project and for sharing fly lines with us. We are also grateful to M.Fernanda Ceriani, Amanda GonzĂĄlez-Segarra, Aishwarya Ramakrishnan Iyer, Orie Shafer, and Troy Shirangi for helpful comments on the manuscript, Annika Barber and Troy Shirangi for helpful discussions, Orie Shafer for the rat anti-PER antibody and Michael Rosbash for fly lines. The mouse anti-PDF antibody was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242. Stocks obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) were used in this study.
Data Availability
All the data are freely available, without restrictions, and it can be found here: https://github.com/graceb4/cyc-ms-raw-dataâ.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF IOS 2239994) to M.P.F. This grant provided the salary for G.B. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.