We can’t show the full text here under this license.
JMIR research protocols···
Function and quality of asthma mobile apps compared to international guidelines
Updated
Abstract
This review aims to evaluate the quality and functionality of asthma mobile health apps available in Australia.
- The evaluation will assess adult-targeted asthma mHealth apps against the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines.
- A systematic search will identify suitable apps from two popular app stores.
- App quality will be measured using the Mobile App Rating Scale framework.
- Functionality will be assessed using the Intercontinental Medical Statistics Institute for Health Informatics Functionality Scoring System.
- This review is expected to provide insights into the consistency of asthma apps with international best practices.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disorder that requires long-term pharmacotherapy and patient empowerment to manage the condition and recognize and respond to asthma exacerbations. Mobile health (mHealth) apps represent a potential medium through which patients can improve their ability to self-manage their asthma. Few studies have conducted a systematic evaluation of asthma mobile apps for quality and functionality using a validated tool. None of these reviews have systematically assessed these apps for their content and evaluated them against the available international best practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic search and evaluation of adult-targeted asthma mHealth apps. As part of this review, the potential of an mHealth app to improve asthma self-management and the overall quality of the app will be evaluated using the Mobile App Rating Scale framework, and the quality of the information within an app will be evaluated using the current Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines as a reference.
METHODS: A stepwise methodological approach was taken in creating this review. First, the most recent Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines were independently reviewed by 2 authors to identify key recommendations that could be feasibly incorporated into an mHealth app. A previously developed asthma assessment framework was identified and was modified to suit our research and ensure that all of these identified recommendations were included. In total, 2 popular app stores were reviewed to identify potential mHealth apps. These apps were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Suitable apps were then evaluated. Technical information was obtained from publicly available information. The next step was to perform an app quality assessment using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale framework to objectively determine the quality of an app. App functionality was assessed using the Intercontinental Medical Statistics Institute for Health Informatics Functionality Scoring System. Finally, the mHealth apps were assessed using our developed checklist.
RESULTS: Funding has been received for the project from the Respiratory Department at Northern Health, Victoria. Three reviewers have been recruited to systematically evaluate the apps. The results of this study are expected in 2022.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this review represents the first study to examine all mHealth apps available in Australia that are targeted to adults with asthma for their functionality, quality, and consistency with international best practice guidelines. Although this review will only be conducted on mHealth apps available in Australia, many apps are available worldwide; thus, this study should be largely generalizable to other English-speaking regions and users. The results of this review will help to fill gaps in the literature and assist clinicians in providing evidence-based advice to patients wishing to use mHealth apps as part of their asthma self-management.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 269894; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=269894.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/33103.
Related papers
Jan '24
Function and Quality of Asthma Mobile Apps Compared to International Guidelines
top 10% journal
cited by 9 papers
systematic review
Oct '21
Methods to Measure Mobile Health App Quality in Rich and Poor Countries: Rapid Review
top 10% journal
cited by 28 papers
research support, non-u.s. gov't
Jul '21
Review of Chinese Mobile Health Apps for Managing Ankylosing Spondylitis
top 10% journal
cited by 16 papers
journal article
May '21
Effective German and English Mobile Apps for Children and Teens to Manage Bronchial Asthma: A Comparison Study
top 10% journal
cited by 11 papers
journal article
Jul '24
How Well Mobile Apps Help Improve Gum Health: Plan for a Review and Analysis
top 50% journal
cited by 6 papers
journal article
Jan '24
How Well Type 2 Diabetes Apps Follow International Guidelines: Plan for a Quantitative Review
top 50% journal
journal article
Aug '17
How Mobile Apps Can Help People Manage Their Asthma: A Review of Popular Asthma Apps
top 10% journal
cited by 154 papers
journal article
Aug '19
How Clear and Useful Chronic Condition Self-Management Apps in France Are for Helping Behavior Change
top 10% journal
cited by 10 papers
systematic review
Mar '24
Mobile Apps for Managing Common Chronic Diseases: App Store Search and Quality Evaluation
top 10% journal
cited by 24 papers
systematic review
May '20
Quality of Mobile Apps for Identifying Pressure Sores in Adults
top 10% journal
cited by 31 papers
systematic review