What this is
- () is increasingly common, and its link to circadian rhythms is underexplored.
- This research investigates how the proteins BMAL1 and CLOCK influence cell growth.
- Findings reveal that these proteins promote cell proliferation by regulating apoptosis and the cell cycle.
Essence
- BMAL1 and CLOCK are essential for cell proliferation, controlling apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Targeting these proteins can potentially inform new cancer therapies.
Key takeaways
- BMAL1 and CLOCK are critical for cell growth, as their knockdown significantly impairs proliferation across various cell lines.
- Down-regulating BMAL1 or CLOCK activates apoptosis and arrests the cell cycle at the G/M phase, indicating their role in cell cycle regulation.
- The study suggests that targeting BMAL1 and CLOCK could be a viable strategy for developing therapies against .
Caveats
- The study primarily focuses on in vitro findings, which may not fully translate to in vivo conditions.
- Variations in circadian rhythm profiles among different cell lines may complicate the generalization of results.
Definitions
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A primary malignancy of the liver, often associated with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.
- Circadian clock: An internal timing mechanism that regulates physiological processes in a roughly 24-hour cycle.
AI simplified
Results
The Core Clock GenesandAre Indispensable for HCC Cell Growth. Bmal1 Clock
We first interrogated the circadian rhythms in three widely used human HCC cells, Hep3B, HepG2, and Huh7, finding each displayed a distinct pattern (Fig. 1 A–C), with the Hep3B cells oscillating most robustly and the Huh7 cells not technically cycling according to circadian parameters (SI Appendix, Fig. S1↗). To study the functional roles of the core circadian clock in the HCC cells, we targeted Bmal1 and Clock by introducing siRNA-mediated gene knockdown. Despite the heterogeneous intrinsic circadian oscillations, targeting either Bmal1 or Clock potently impaired the proliferation of all three HCC cell lines (Fig. 1 D–I). We validated the clock machinery dependency in vivo with Hep3B xenografts by showing that shRNA-mediated Bmal1/Clock knockdown strongly inhibited tumor growth (Fig. 1 J and K). Therefore, the master circadian clock transcription factor heterodimer BMAL1::CLOCK plays a critical role in HCC cell proliferation, irrespective of the robustness of circadian oscillations or other genetic backgrounds, and is relevant to impaired tumor growth in vivo.
The core clock genesandare required for HCC cell growth independent of circadian oscillation. (–) Representative bioluminescence ofreporter in Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () cells synchronized by 150 nM dexamethasone (n = 3). (–) Relative cell numbers of Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble,, orsiRNA. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test (***< 0.001). (–) Transcript level of genes in Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble,, orsiRNA was determined by RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 cell culture wells) normalized toexpression levels. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed Student’stest (***< 0.001). (and) NU/J nude mice were subcutaneously injected with 3 × 10Hep3B cells transduced with indicated shRNAs. Xenograft tumors were imaged () and weighed (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’stest (***< 0.001). Bmal1 Clock A C Bmal1-Luc A B C D F D E F Bmal1 Clock P G I G H I Bmal1 Clock Rplp0 t P J K J K t P 6
TargetingandInduces Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in HCC. Bmal1 Clock
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying BMAL1::CLOCK-regulated HCC proliferation, we determined cellular effects of Bmal1 and Clock knockdown. Flow-cytometric measurement of Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining as well as the cleavage of CASPASE 3 revealed the activation of bonafide apoptosis upon Bmal1 or Clock knockdown (Fig. 2 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2↗). Bmal1/Clock-targeted HCC cells displayed a decreased G1 fraction and a concomitant increase in the G2/M fraction relative to cells transduced with a non-targeting control siRNA (Fig. 2 C and D), indicating inhibited cell cycle progression. To determine if similar regulation occurs in normal tissues, we performed RT-qPCR characterization of the Bmal1 knockout mouse liver, which identified extensively disrupted transcription of cell cycle genes compared to the wild-type liver; specifically, Wee1 and Ccnb1 were down-regulated and p21 and Myc were up-regulated (Fig. 2E). Therefore, BMAL1::CLOCK may control transcription of the cell cycle regulators (20).
Down-regulating/activates apoptosis and G/M phase cell cycle arrest. () Representative flow cytometry analysis of FITC-Annexin V/PI staining in Hep3B cells transfected with scramble,, orsiRNA. () Quantification of FITC-Annexin V/PI-positive cells presented in (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (***< 0.001). () Representative cell cycle analysis of Hep3B cells following transfection with scramble,, orsiRNA. () Quantification of cell cycle phases presented in (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (**< 0.01, ***< 0.001). () Control andknockout mouse livers were harvested at 4-h intervals throughout 24 h. Transcript level of genes was analyzed by using RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 or 4) normalized to non-oscillatingexpression levels.-values determined by two-tailed Student’stest were displayed (*< 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.001). Bmal1 Clock A Bmal1 Clock B A P C Bmal1 Clock D C P P E Bmal1 Rplp0 P t P P P 2
The Circadian Clock Contributes to Control of Cell Cycle Progression by Transcriptional Regulation of,, and. Ccnb1 p21 Myc
We were accordingly prompted to investigate whether BMAL1::CLOCK promotes the growth of HCC cells by modulating cell cycle progression and division. We first inspected the mechanism underpinning clock-regulated cell cycle progression. As cell cycle progression requires well-orchestrated transcriptional control of the cell cycle regulators (21), we characterized the impact of the altered transcription of cell cycle genes in response to Bmal1 depletion (Fig. 2E). siRNA-mediated Wee1 downregulation induced G1 phase accumulation (Fig. 3 A and B), which is compatible with its functional roles in activating the G2/M checkpoint (22). In contrast, the knockdown of Ccnb1, a G2/M-specific cyclin, reduced the fraction of cells in G1 phase and increased the proportion of cells in the G2/M phase (Fig. 3 A and B). Overexpression of p21, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that promotes cell cycle arrest (23), increased the fraction of cells arrested in G2/M phase (Fig. 3 C and D). Consistent with previous studies (24), induction of Myc expression increased cell population arrested in the G2/M phase (Fig. 3 C and D). Therefore, the G2/M phase cell cycle arrest resulting from Bmal1/Clock knockdown (Fig. 2 C and D) is likely associated with transcriptional downregulation of Ccnb1 and upregulation of p21 and Myc.
knockdown andoroverexpression cause G/M phase arrest. () Representative cell cycle analysis of Hep3B cells following transfection with scramble,, orsiRNA. () Quantification of cell cycle phases presented in (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’stest (***< 0.001; ns, not significant). () Representative cell cycle analysis of Hep3B cells following lentiviral transduction of EGFP,, orgene. () Quantification of cell cycle phases presented in (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’stest (***< 0.001). Ccnb1 p21 Myc A Wee1 Ccnb1 B A t P C p21 Myc D C t P 2
BMAL1::CLOCK Promotes HCC Cell Proliferation by Suppressing the Cell Cycle Regulator. p21
Cell cycle checkpoints regulate the rate of cell division. Next, we assessed whether the Ccnb1, Myc, and p21-associated G2/M phase cell cycle arrest in response to Bmal1/Clock downregulation reduced cell proliferation. Knockdown of Ccnb1 alone had a minor impact on HCC cell growth (Fig. 4 A–F). Also, upregulation of the proto-oncogene Myc is unlikely to lead to HCC proliferation inhibition. Therefore, the G2/M phase arrest does not necessarily result in reduced cell proliferation per se, in concordance with previous reports that depending on molecular context, either inhibition or activation of the G2/M checkpoint can induce cell death (25).
Bmal1 knockout increased the basal level of p21 and reversed its peak expression from ZT0 to ZT12 (Fig. 2E). Gréchez-Cassiau and co-workers reported that the cyclic expression of p21 was controlled by the RORE-binding clock transcription factors REV-ERBs and RORs and up-regulated p21 was responsible for the decreased hepatocyte proliferation rate in the Bmal1 knockout mouse liver (26). We found that concurrent knockdown of p21 partially rescued HCC growth inhibition induced by Bmal1/Clock knockdown (Fig. 4 G and H). p21 overexpression did not substantially change the activity of apoptosis in Hep3B cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S3↗), in line with previous reports (27). Collectively, our findings indicate that BMAL1::CLOCK negatively regulates the RORE-containing cell cycle regulator p21 to maintain proliferation rate of HCC cells.
/controls HCC cell growth by suppressing. (–) Relative cell numbers of Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble orsiRNA. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test (ns, not significant). (–) Transcript level of genes in Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble orsiRNA was determined by RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 cell culture wells) normalized toexpression levels. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed Student’stest (***< 0.001). () Relative cell numbers of Hep3B transfected with scramble,,, orsiRNA. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test (***< 0.001). () Transcript level of genes in Hep3B transfected with scramble,,, orsiRNA was determined by RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 cell culture wells) normalized toexpression levels. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed Student’stest (**< 0.01, ***< 0.001; ns, not significant). Bmal1 Clock p21 A C A B C Ccnb1 D F D E F Ccnb1 Rplp0 t P G Bmal1 Clock p21 P H Bmal1 Clock p21 Rplp0 t P P
BMAL1::CLOCK Promotes HCC Cell Proliferation by Stimulating Expression of the Cancer-state Essential Gene. Wee1
Cancer cells are reliant on WEE1-activated G2/M checkpoint to cope with DNA damage and avoid apoptosis (28). Analogous to Bmal1/Clock knockdown, we found that down-regulating Wee1 attenuated proliferation and caused apoptosis in HCC cells (Fig. 5 A–H). As depleting Bmal1 significantly reduced Wee1 levels in both mouse liver and Hep3B cells (Fig. 2E and SI Appendix, Fig. S4↗), we asked whether Wee1 downregulation contributed to cell lethality resulting from BMAL1::CLOCK inhibition. Overexpression of Wee1 did not change the expression levels of Bmal1 and Clock (Fig. 5I) but could partially rescue cell growth inhibition caused by BMAL1::CLOCK downregulation (Fig. 5J). Wee1 transcription showed robust circadian oscillation in the mouse liver, peaking at the end of the day, in phase with the classical BMAL1::CLOCK target gene Dbp (Fig. 2E). BMAL1 chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) indicated that BMAL1::CLOCK binds Wee1 genes in both mouse liver and Hep3B cells (Fig. 5K). Therefore, Wee1 inhibits apoptosis and contributes to BMAL1::CLOCK-controlled HCC cell growth.
/controls HCC cell growth by activating. (–) Relative cell numbers of Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble,,, orsiRNA. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison test (***< 0.001). (–) Transcript level of genes in Hep3B (), HepG2 (), and Huh7 () transfected with scramble orsiRNA were determined by RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 cell culture wells) normalized toexpression levels. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed Student’stest (***< 0.001). () Representative flow cytometry analysis of FITC-Annexin V/PI staining in Hep3B cells transfected with scramble orsiRNA. () Quantification of FITC-Annexin V/PI-positive cells presented in (). Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’stest (***< 0.001). () Transcript level of genes in Hep3B stably overexpressing GFP orwas determined by RT-qPCR. Displayed are the means ± SD (n = 3 cell culture wells) normalized toexpression levels. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed Student’stest (***< 0.001; ns, not significant). () Relative cell numbers of Hep3B stably overexpressing GFP orfollowed by transfection withorsiRNA. Cell numbers were normalized to Hep3B cells transfected with scramble siRNA of the same time point. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined by two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison tests (***< 0.001). () IGV genome tracks showing BMAL1 enrichment at thegene loci in the mouse liver and Hep3B cells, based on normalized ChIP-seq read coverage. Track heights are indicated. () Mechanism of BMAL1::CLOCK-regulated HCC oncogenesis. BMAL1::CLOCK binds the E-box element on chromatin and activates the transcription ofand. REV-ERBs suppresses the expression ofthrough binding RORE element. The inhibition of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, which are activated bydownregulation andupregulation, respectively, collaboratively contribute to pro-proliferative activity of BMAL1::CLOCK. Bmal1 Clock Wee1 A C A B C Bmal1 Clock Wee1 P D F D E F Wee1 Rplp0 t P G Wee1 H G t P I Wee1 Rplp0 t P J Wee1 Bmal1 Clock P K Wee1 L Rev-erbs Wee1 p21 p21 Wee1
Discussion
Previous studies strongly support the crosstalk between HCC and the circadian clock. Modeling chronic jet lag to disrupt the circadian rhythms accelerated DEN-induced murine liver carcinogenesis (18) and even increased the incidence of spontaneous HCC associated with NAFLD (19). However, as chronic jet lag induced circadian desynchrony of most key clock genes, it is challenging to generalize from the results to the role of any single clock component in the observed HCC predisposition. Conversely, circadian transcript analysis of patient specimens revealed that a large body of genes cycling in noncancerous tissues, including specific core clock genes, lost oscillations in HCC tumors (29–34). Here, our results provide molecular insights into this HCC-clock crosstalk by unveiling that the core clock transcription factor BMAL1::CLOCK is hijacked by cancer cells to fuel rapid cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis in HCC, independent of the genetic background or core clock oscillations.
Mechanistically, inhibiting Bmal1 or Clock triggered systemic dysregulation of the cell cycle in HCC cells featured by activation of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Relative to Bmal1, we found knocking down Clock induced more apoptosis and arrested cell cycle at both the S and G2/M phases. It will be of interest for future studies to investigate whether the difference is because of potentially differentiated biological functions of the Bmal1 and Clock genes or solely due to higher knockdown efficiency of the Clock siRNA (Fig. 1 G–I). Further, we provide genetic evidence supporting a scenario in which transcriptional alterations of the key cell cycle regulators Wee1 and p21 cooperatively contribute to cell growth inhibition in cells where BMAL1::CLOCK is down-regulated. BMAL1::CLOCK downregulation halted the cell cycle progression by up-regulating p21 and meanwhile activated apoptosis by down-regulating Wee1. As BMAL1 cooperates with the hepatocyte nuclear factor HNF4A in driving the liver-specific circadian regulation of tumorigenesis (15, 16, 35, 36), BMAL1::CLOCK is a versatile player in HCC oncogenesis targeting multiple pathways. This study provides proof-of-principle for future development of novel liver cancer therapies via modulation of the circadian clock. CRYs, PERs, and REV-ERBs agonists inhibit BMAL1::CLOCK through circadian clock negative feedback loops (7). Therapeutics targeting the molecular clock has strong potential to be explored either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, with Wee1 and p21 potentially serving as molecular markers for evaluation of anticancer efficacy.
p21, a tumor suppressor that arrests cell growth by inhibiting cell cycle progression, is expressed at lower levels in HCC tissues than that in the corresponding normal liver (37–39). p21 ablation induces continuous hepatocyte proliferation and enhances hepatocarcinogenesis in mice (40, 41). Thus, controlling compensatory proliferation by high levels of p21 is likely critical to preventing HCC development. Pharmacological approaches developed for anticancer therapy targeting histone deacetylase (HDAC), PI3K-Akt, or MDM2-p53 interaction selectively induce p21 expression, thereby leading to decreased cell viability (42). Our findings shed new light on p21 regulation, now identifying the gene as a target of the circadian clock transcriptional network underlying the oncogenic function of BMAL1::CLOCK. Therefore, targeting p21 for activation of cell cycle arrest presents an opportunity to potentiate HCC therapy using clock drugs as an adjuvant.
Normal cells repair damaged DNA during the G1/S cell cycle arrest, whereas cancer cells often have a deficient G1/S checkpoint and depend on a functional G2/M checkpoint for DNA repair and survival. The WEE1 kinase that plays a crucial role in the G2/M checkpoint arrest displays universally high expression in cancer. WEE1 inhibitors, including AZD1775 (MK1775), have been developed to compromise the G2/M checkpoint in combination with DNA damaging agents (22). In HCC tumors, WEE1 levels and kinase activity were found significantly elevated relative to surrounding cirrhotic tissues (43). Concordant with a previous study showing that BMAL1::CLOCK directly activates Wee1 transcription in an vitro system (44), we found that BMAL1 bound the Wee1 gene promoter (Fig. 5K) and Bmal1 depletion significantly reduced the Wee1 mRNA levels in liver cells (Fig. 2E and SI Appendix, Fig. S4↗). Down-regulating Wee1 in HCC cells substantially attenuated HCC cell viability and induced apoptosis, which played an important role in the cytotoxicity effect of Bmal1/Clock inhibition (Fig. 5 A–J). Collectively, our observations support the concept that anti-apoptosis activity of the cancer-specific WEE1 contributes to BMAL1::CLOCK stimulated HCC cell proliferation. Small molecules targeting the clock are supposed to mimic WEE1 inhibitors but may provide increased specificity over the kinase modifiers for increasing DNA damage sensitivity of HCC patients.
Materials and Methods
Animal Experiments.
All animal care and experiments were performed under the institutional protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Southern California. For mouse liver RT-qPCR analysis, mice were housed in a 12-h light/12-h dark (LD) cycle with free access to food and water and age of 10 to 12 wk were used. For the xenograft transplantation model, NU/J nude mice (The Jackson Library #002019) were subcutaneously transplanted in the right flank with 3 × 106 Hep3B cells transduced with a non-targeting control shRNA or shRNA targeting either Bmal1 or Clock. Tumor growth was monitored for 4 wk by measuring tumor diameter and weight at the endpoint.
Cell Culture.
Hep3B and Huh7 cells were grown in complete DMEM (Life Technologies cat. #11995065) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. HepG2 cells were grown in Ham’s F12 (Corning Cellgro 10-080-CV) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin. All cells were grown in a 37 °C incubator at 5% CO2.
Circadian Assays.
For circadian assays, human liver cancer cells were plated on 35-mm dishes and synchronized as previously described by a dexamethasone shock (10, 15, 16, 45). In brief, cell culture media was replaced with HEPES-buffered phenol-free DMEM media containing 100 nM dexamethasone and 100 μM D-luciferin. Dishes were covered with 40-mm glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific) and sealed with vacuum grease to prevent evaporation. Luminescence signals were monitored every 10 min using the LumiCycle luminometer (Actimetrics) at 37 °C without supplementary CO2. Results shown are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Cell Viability Assay.
Cells were plated in 96-well plate at a density of ~1,000 cells per well. Relative ATP level was measured following the instruction of CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, G7570).
Cell Cycle Analysis and Apoptosis Assay.
Cells were collected and resuspended in Tris-buffered saline with 10 µg/mL DAPI and 0.1% nonidet P-40 detergent for flow cytometry. Cell cycle phases were analyzed using FlowJo software. Apoptosis was measured using FITC-Annexin V antibody and PI staining following manufacturer’s instruction (Life Technology, V13241). Cells were read using flow cytometry (BD Bioscience), and the results were analyzed via FlowJo.
Quantitative RT-PCR.
Liver tissues of 10- to 12-wk-old male mice were harvested at indicated Zeitgeber times. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent according to manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies cat. #15596026) and then reverse transcribed to cDNA using iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad cat. #1708891). We designed real-time primers spanning the exon–intron junctions using the IDT primer-designing software PrimerQuest (https://www.idtdna.com/PrimerQuest↗). Primer sequences are
RT-qPCR analyses were performed as described previously (15, 16, 45) with CFX384 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad).
Western Blotting.
Frozen mouse liver tissue was homogenized in RIPA buffer containing 1x EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) using Omni Tissue Homogenizer (Omni International). The total protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad Protein Assay and then equalized to 15 g/L. 25 μg of total protein was used for the western blot assay, performed as previously described (15, 16, 45). Antibodies used in the western blots are anti-BMAL1 (Cell signaling, #14020), anti-Wee1 (Cell signaling, #4936), and anti-TUBULIN (Sigma-Aldrich, T0198).
Quantification and Statistical Analysis.
The significance of differences between peak distance, period length, and gene expression was evaluated by unpaired Student’s t test (two-tailed), with significant differences at P < 0.05.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Li-Lin Du (National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China) and Jia-Min Zhang (Tongji University, China) for critically reading the manuscript. This study was funded by grants from the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center Translational Team Accelerator Program (S.A.K. and H.-J.L.). J.N.R. is funded by NIH (P30 CA047904, CA238662, CA197718, NS103434). W.H. is funded by NIH (CA139158, DK124627). Z.J. is funded by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant (2019-67022-29930). H.T. is funded by NIH (P50 AA011999, U01 AA027681), Department of Veterans Affairs (5 I01BX001991), and Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Research Career Scientist Award (5 IK6BX004205).
Author contributions
M.Q., G.Z., J.N.R., and S.A.K. designed research; M.Q., G.Z., A.V., and R.W. performed research; M.Q., G.Z., H.Q., H.T., Z.J., W.H., H.-J.L., J.N.R., and S.A.K. analyzed data; H.T., Z.J., W.H., H.-J.L., and J.N.R. provided edits of the paper; and M.Q. and S.A.K. wrote the paper.
Competing interest
S.A.K., discloses his financial interest in Synchronicity Pharma, where he serves on the Board of Directors.
Footnotes
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix↗.
Supporting Information
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix↗.