Full text is available at the source.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews··
Using high versus low starting doses of sevoflurane for starting anesthesia by breathing it in
Updated
Abstract
In a review of 11 studies involving 829 participants, high initial concentration sevoflurane was associated with induction times that were typically 24 to 82 seconds faster.
- High initial concentration sevoflurane may lead to faster loss of the eyelash reflex, with an average difference of 41 seconds.
- Apnoea occurred more frequently in the high concentration group, with a risk ratio of 3.14.
- No significant differences were found in the incidence of cough, laryngospasm, breath holding, patient movement, or bradycardia between the two groups.
- The overall incidence of complications was low across both induction techniques.
- Findings are based on low-quality evidence and should be interpreted cautiously.
Simplified
BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane induction for general anaesthesia has been reported to be safe, reliable and well accepted by patients. Sevoflurane induction uses either low or high initial concentrations. The low initial concentration technique involves initially administering a low concentration of sevoflurane and gradually increasing the concentration of the dose until the patient is anaesthetized. The high initial concentration technique involves administering high concentrations from the beginning, then continuing with those high doses until the patient is anaesthetized. This review was originally published in 2013 and has been updated in 2016.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare induction times and complication rates between high and low initial concentration sevoflurane anaesthetic induction techniques in adults and children who received inhalational induction for general anaesthesia. We defined 'high' as greater than or equal to and 'low' as less than a 4% initial concentration.
SEARCH METHODS: For the updated review, we searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2016), EMBASE (1980 to February 2016), Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to February 2016) and the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science (1946 to February 2016). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings and contacted the authors of included trials. The original search was run in September 2011.
SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all published and unpublished, randomized controlled trials comparing high versus low initial sevoflurane concentration inhalational induction. Our primary outcomes included two measures of anaesthesia (time to loss of the eyelash reflex (LOER) and time until a weighted object held in the patient's hand was dropped), time to successful insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and time to endotracheal intubation. Other outcomes were complications of the technique.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standardized methods for conducting a systematic review as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two review authors independently extracted details of trial methods and outcome data from reports of all trials considered eligible for inclusion. We conducted all analyses on an intention-to-treat basis, when possible. We estimated overall treatment effects by using a fixed-effect model when we found no substantial heterogeneity, whereas we applied the random-effects model in the presence of considerable heterogeneity.
MAIN RESULTS: We reran the searches and included one new study (100 participants) in this updated review. In total, we included 11 studies with 829 participants, although most analyses were based on data from fewer participants and evidence of low quality. We noted substantial heterogeneity in the included trials. Thus, our results should be read with caution. It was not possible to combine trials for the primary outcome (LOER), but individual trials reported faster induction times (typically 24 to 82 seconds faster, 41 seconds (31.37 to 50.62)) with high initial concentration sevoflurane (six studies, 443 participants, low-quality evidence). Apnoea appeared to be more common in the high initial concentration sevoflurane group (risk ratio (RR) 3.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 5.7, two studies, 160 participants, low-quality evidence). We found no evidence of differences between the two groups in the incidence of cough (odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.81, eight studies, 589 participants, low-quality evidence), laryngospasm (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.16 to 15.9, seven studies, 588 participants, low-quality evidence), breath holding (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.83, five studies, 389 participants, low-quality evidence), patient movement (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.89, five studies, 445 participants, low-quality evidence) or bradycardia (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.88, three studies, 199 participants, low-quality evidence), and the overall incidence of complications was low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A high initial concentration sevoflurane technique probably offers more rapid induction of anaesthesia and a similar rate of complications, except for apnoea, which may be more common with a high initial concentration. However, this conclusion is not definitive because the included studies provided evidence of low quality.
Related papers
Nov '22
Folic acid supplements and malaria risk and severity in people using antifolate malaria drugs in affected areas
cited by 29 papers
systematic review
Feb '14
Comparison of vein-injected and breathing-in anesthesia for children's same-day surgery
cited by 14 papers
systematic review
Aug '18
Effects of intravenous versus inhaled anesthesia on thinking and memory after surgery in older adults having non-heart operations
cited by 106 papers
systematic review
Mar '16
Using brain signal complexity to monitor adults and children during general anesthesia
cited by 19 papers
systematic review
Sep '14
Sevoflurane compared to other general anesthetics and their impact on children’s waking agitation
cited by 87 papers
systematic review
Sep '16
Comparing IV and breathing methods for quick wake-up after brain tumor surgery
cited by 13 papers
journal article
Nov '15
General anesthesia using nitrous oxide compared to methods without nitrous oxide
cited by 14 papers
systematic review