What this is
- This research outlines the prostanoid pathway in the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon.
- It identifies nine prostanoid biosynthesis genes and detects prostaglandins in shrimp ovaries.
- The findings suggest a functional role for these molecules in ovarian development.
Essence
- The study characterizes the prostanoid pathway in Penaeus monodon, identifying key biosynthesis genes and detecting prostaglandins linked to ovarian maturation.
Key takeaways
- Nine prostanoid biosynthesis genes were amplified from Penaeus monodon ovaries, showing 51-99% sequence identity to homologs in other species.
- Prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) was detected in shrimp ovaries for the first time, alongside prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and ().
- As ovarian maturation progressed, the expression of prostaglandin F synthase gene transcripts and levels of PGF2α decreased, indicating a potential regulatory role in development.
Caveats
- The study's findings are based on gene expression and biochemical analysis, which may not fully capture the complexity of prostanoid functions in vivo.
- The correlation between prostaglandin levels and ovarian maturation stages may vary across different shrimp species.
Definitions
- Prostanoids: Bioactive lipids derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids, involved in various physiological processes.
- Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): Fatty acids with multiple double bonds, serving as precursors for prostanoid synthesis.
AI simplified
Introduction
Prostanoids are oxygenated derivatives of C-20 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) that play active roles in inflammation, immune response, cardiovascular control and reproduction in most animals [1-3]. These PUFAs, which serve as precursors of the prostanoid pathway, include arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The prostanoid pathway begins with the enzyme phospholipase A2, which releases AA from the phospholipids of cellular and intracellular membranes [3]. The released AA is then cyclized and subsequently reduced by the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme to form prostaglandin G2 (PGG2) and prostaglandin H2 (PGH2), respectively [4,5]. Downstream enzymes, including prostaglandin and thromboxane synthases, later convert PGH2 to prostanoids, such as prostaglandins, prostacyclins and thromboxanes, which serve as signaling molecules in various physiological responses [3,6].
The presence of PUFAs and prostaglandins in crustaceans has long been the focus of aquaculture research. All three prostanoid precursors (AA, EPA and DHA) have been identified in the Chinese prawn Penaeus chinensis [7], the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei [8], the green tiger prawn Penaeus semisulcatus [9], the kuruma prawn Marsupenaeus japonicus [10,11], the banana shrimp Penaeus merguiensis [12] and Penaeus monodon [13,14]. In addition, EPA has been identified in the common littoral crab Carcinus maenas [15] and the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus [16], while DHA has been detected in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii [17]. On the other hand, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) have been identified in M. japonicus [10] and the Florida crayfish Procambarus paeninsulanus [18,19]. Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), PGE2 and PGF2α have been detected in the fresh water field crab Oziotelphusa senex senex [20], while PGE2, thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and 6-keto-PGF1α have been reported in C. maenas [15]. In addition, PGE2 has been identified in hemolymph, muscle and ovary of domesticated P. monodon [21], but the presence of PGF2α has not been reported in this species.
In crustaceans, one of the more prominent roles of prostanoids is the regulation of female reproductive maturation. For instance, the production of PGE2 and PGF2α is positively correlated with ovarian maturation in P. paeninsulanus [18] and O. senex senex [20]. Furthermore, injection of PGE2 and PGF2α into ovaries of O. senex senex significantly increased the number and the diameter of the oocytes in a dose-dependent manner [20]. In domesticated P. monodon, the amounts of PGE2 in ovaries and haemolymph increased along with developing ovary stages [21]. However, the correlation between prostaglandins and crustacean ovary development may be species specific, as the amounts of PGE2 and PGF2α were highest in ovaries stage I and continued to decrease until stage IV in M. japonicus [10]. Nevertheless, these findings suggest a possible involvement of the prostanoid biosynthesis in crustacean female reproductive system.
Although the production of prostanoids and their precursors is well-established in most crustaceans, prostanoid biosynthesis genes in these species are poorly characterized. Thus far, the only crustacean with a fully constructed prostanoid pathway is the fresh water flea Daphnia pulex, whose annotated genome sequence revealed nine prostanoid biosynthesis genes: cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), COX, prostaglandin D2 synthase A, prostaglandin D2 synthase B, prostaglandin E2 synthase (PGES), carbonyl reductase 1, thromboxane A and thromboxane B, and two prostanoid receptors prostanoid receptor EP4 isoform A and B [22]. In marine crustaceans, COX genes have been identified in Gammarus spp. and Caprella spp. [23], while PGES genes have been characterized in L. vannamei [24], the American lobster Homarus americanus (Accession: MGID155886 from the Marine Genomic Project) [24] and the sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus rogercresseyi [25].
Due to the roles of prostanoids in the reproductive system in most crustaceans, the characterization of the prostanoid pathway in economically valuable organisms, such as penaeid shrimp, is essential for both scientific gain and potential applications in aquaculture practice. In this study, we propose a scheme for the P. monodon prostanoid pathway based on the identification of eight P. monodon prostanoid biosynthesis genes, the detection of lipid precursors and prostaglandins, and the detection of prostaglandin synthase activity. The correlations observed among gene transcription, prostaglandin production, and ovarian maturation also suggest that prostaglandin biosynthesis may be involved in the regulation of the P. monodon female reproductive system.
Results
Identification ofprostanoid biosynthesis genes P. monodon
Based on available EST sequences from The Black Tiger Shrimp EST Project [26] and the Marine Genomics Project [24], short fragments of P. monodon prostanoid biosynthesis genes were amplified from shrimp ovary cDNA. RACE-PCR was used to obtain full-length gene sequences, resulting in the identification of nine putative P. monodon prostanoid biosynthesis genes: cytosolic phospholipase A2 (PmcPLA2), hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase (PmhPGDS), glutathione-dependent prostaglandin D synthase (PmgPGDS), prostaglandin E synthase 1 (PmPGES1), prostaglandin E synthase 2 (PmPGES2), prostaglandin E synthase 3 (PmPGES3), prostaglandin F synthase (PmPGFS), thromboxane A synthase (PmTBXAS), and cyclooxygenase (PmCOX). These gene sequences were then analyzed by TBLASTX, revealing 51-99% sequence identities of the predicted P. monodon enzymes when compared with their closest homologs (Table 1).
| Genes | accession #Pm | AA | Matched accession # (Reference species) | Identity | E-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cPLA2 | JN003878 | 998 | ()NM_001081843Equus caballus | 60% | 2e-180 |
| hPGDS | JN003879 | 203 | ()HM231278Eriocheir sinensis | 99% | 5e-37 |
| gPGDS | JN003880 | 153 | ()XM_003694283Apis florea | 79% | 4e-23 |
| PGES3 | JN003881 | 164 | ()JF806619Litopenaeus vannamei | 51% | 2e-108 |
| PGES1 | JN003882 | 145 | ()JQ917473Nilaparvata lugens | 76% | 7e-35 |
| PGES2 | JN003883 | 338 | ()XM_003706983Megachile rotundata | 89% | 4e-108 |
| PGFS | JN003884 | 317 | ()JX513906Reticulitermes flavipes | 98% | 3e-67 |
| TBXAS | JN003885 | 533 | ()XM_004069858Oryzias latipes | 60% | 8e-62 |
| COX | KF501342 | 614 | ()GQ180796Gammarussp. | 91% | 0 |
Analysis of conserved residues and domains inandgenes PmPGES1, PmPGES2, PmPGES3 PmPGFS
The putative P. monodon prostanoid biosynthesis genes were submitted to the Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool (CDART) for protein domain prediction, revealing that the P. monodon proteins contain the same domain types and positions as the prostanoid enzymes found in other species (Figure S1). At this point, PmPGES and PmPGFS were examined in more details, as these genes are likely to be responsible for the biosynthesis of PGE2 and PGF2α, which has been shown to affect ovarian development in other crustaceans [10,18,20].
In P. monodon, three isoforms of PmPGES have been cloned and characterized, namely PmPGES1, PmPGES2 and PmPGES3, which have corresponding isoforms in mammals. PGES1 or membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase 1 is a member of the Membrane-Associated Protein involved in Eicosanoid and Glutathione metabolism (MAPEG) [27,28]. PGES1 requires glutathione for its enzymatic function, which involves converting PGH2 to PGE2 [27]. Multiple sequence alignment of PmPGES1 revealed the conservation of most catalytic residues. For example, D47, which is highly conserved in the PGES1 subgroup of MAPEG, was found in PmPGES1 (Figure 1, star) [29]. In addition, key catalytic residues that interact with PGH2 (R108 and T112 - Figure 1, white arrow heads) as well as glutathione (R36, N72, E75, H111, Y115 and R122 - Figure 1, black arrows) were conserved in PmPGES1 [29-31]. Lastly, PmPGES1 also contains the consensus sequence64ERXXXAXXNXX75 E required for oxygenation product formation (Figure 1, underlined) [31], confirming that PmPGES1 possesses all the necessary residues for its enzymatic function.
PGES2 or membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase 2 is a Golgi membrane-associated pre-protein that requires spontaneous cleavage of the N-terminal hydrophobic domain to become a mature cytosolic enzyme [32,33]. The catalytic domain of PGES2 is a glutathione/thioredoxin-like domain that can be activated by various thiol reducing reagents [34]. Sequence alignment of PmPGES2 revealed a conserved 66C-X-X- 69C (Figure 2, black arrow), which corresponded to110C-X-X-113 C catalytic triad in the human PGES2 active site [35]. A conserved N-terminal hydrophobic domain (Figure 2, underlined) was also identified in PmPGES2, consistent with N-terminal cleavage to generate the mature enzyme.
PGES3 or cytosolic prostaglandin E synthase (cPGES) is a 23 kDa GSH-requiring enzyme that was originally termed p23 based on its initial characterization as a co-chaperone of heat shock protein 90 [28,36]. Unlike the membrane-bound PGES1 and PGES2, PGES3 is a cytosolic, glutathione-requiring enzyme that interacts with casein kinase II (CKII) and Hsp90 [36,37]. In human PGES3, two serine residues (S113 and S118 − Figure 3, arrows) are phosphorylated by CKII to increase PGES3 enzymatic activity. However, only the putative N-terminal phosphorylated serine is conserved in PmPGES3 (Figure 3, black arrow) [37]. CDART prediction of the putative PmPGES3 enzyme revealed the presence of an alpha crystallin-Hsps-p23 like super family domain, which is the same domain found in all PGES3 homologs (Figure S1), further confirming the identity of the PmPGES3 gene.
Lastly, PGFS encodes a bifunctional enzyme in the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily that converts PGD2 and PGH2 to (5Z,13E)-(15S)-9α,11β,15-trihydroxyprosta-5,13-dien-l-oic acid (9α,11β-PGF2) and PGF2α, respectively [38-40]. CDART analysis revealed that PmPGFS contains the domain in the aldo-keto reductase superfamily (Figure S1), which is characteristic of PGFS enzymes [41]. Multiple sequence alignment also indicated that residues required for substrate binding site (D49, S165, N166, Q189, L218, S270, R275 - Figure 4, black arrows) and NADP+ cofactor binding site (A51, Y54, W85, H116 - Figure 4, white arrow heads) are also conserved in PmPGFS [42].
Mapping of essential residues in the predictedPGES1 enzyme. P. monodon Multiple sequence alignments ofPGES1 and their homologs showed a conserved residue for the MAPEG family (white star), catalytic residues that interact with PGH(white arrow head), essential residues for H-bonding to GSH (black arrows) and consensus sequence required for oxygenation product (underline). Genus and species used in this alignment are abbreviated as followed:−, Litopenaeus −,−, Homarus −,−,−,−, Equus −, Bos −and Homo −. P. monodon Penaeus P. monodon L. vannamei Crassostrea Crassostrea virginica H. americanus Pediculus Pediculus humanus corporis Culex Culex quinquefasciatus Tribolium Tribolium castaneum Equus caballus Bos taurus Homo sapiens 2
Mapping of essential residues in the predictedPGES2 enzyme. P. monodon Multiple sequence alignments ofPGES2 protein and their homologs were performed, revealing conserved Cys residues at the active site (black arrows) and the N-terminal sequence of the mature enzyme (underline). Genus and species used in this alignment are abbreviated as followed:−,−, Caligus −, Mus −and Homo −. P. monodon Penaeus P. monodon Pediculus P. humanus corporis Caligus rogercresseyi Mus musculus H. sapiens
Mapping of essential residues in the predictedPGES3 enzyme. P. monodon Multiple sequence alignments ofPGES3 protein and their homologs reveal one conserved serine residue for the CKII phosphorylation site (black arrow), while the other phosphorylation site was not conserved (gray arrow). Genus and species used in this alignment are abbreviated as followed:−, Litopenaeus −, Danio −,−,−,−, Drosophila −, Gallus −, Bos −and Homo −. P. monodon Penaeus P. monodon L. vannamei Danio rerio Pediculus P. humanus corporis Xenopus Xenopus laevis Caenorhabditis Caenorhabditis elegans Drosophila melanogaster Gallus gallus B. taurus H. sapiens
Mapping of essential residues in the predictedPGFS enzyme. P. monodon Multiple sequence alignments ofPGFS protein and their homologs were performed, revealing residues that are important for substrate (black arrows) and the NADPcofactor (white arrow head) binding. Genus and species used in this alignment are abbreviated as followed:−, Litopenaeus −, Canis −, Ovis −, Bos −, Equus −and Homo −. P. monodon Penaeus P. monodon L. vannamei Canis lupus familiaris Ovis aries B. taurus Equus caballus H. sapiens +
RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry analysis of PUFAs and prostaglandins in shrimp ovaries
Once the prostanoid biosynthesis genes had been identified, chemical analysis was performed to detect the presence of corresponding prostanoids in wild P. monodon. Stage IV shrimp ovaries from five broodstock were pooled, homogenized and subjected to solvent extraction. Subsequent RP-HPLC analysis led to the detection of PGF2α and PGE2 as two small peaks that eluted at 9.26 and 10.03 minutes, respectively (Figure 5A and 5B). The identities of these prostaglandins were later confirmed by mass analysis (Figure 5C and 5D). In addition, three prostanoid precursors EPA, DHA and AA were detected with elution times of 30.08, 31.74 and 32.56 minutes, respectively (Figure S2, A and B). Again, mass spectra confirmed the identities of these PUFAs (Figure S2, C-E). Other prostanoids i.e. 6-keto-PGF1α and PGD2 were not detected in P. monodon extracts from stage I-III shrimp ovaries, hepatopancreases, lymphoid organs or hemolymph.
HPLC analysis and mass spectra of the prostaglandins in shrimp ovary extract. Ovaries from 5 wild broodstock were homogenized in HBSS, pooled together and incubated at 28 °C, 200 rpm for 1 h. The homogenate was extracted and analyzed by RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry as described in Materials and Methods. RP-HPLC elution profiles at 200 nm wavelength of commercially available prostaglandin standards (A) and prostaglandins found in ovary homogenate (B). Subsequent mass spectrometry analysis of PG in ovary homogenate yielded mass spectra of PGE(C) and PGF(D). 2 2α
Prostaglandin synthase activity inovarian tissue P. monodon
The identification of PmPGES and PmPGFS genes and their corresponding products led us to speculate that prostaglandin synthase activity could be present in shrimp ovaries. To test this hypothesis, in vitro prostaglandin synthase activity assay was performed by incubating shrimp ovary homogenates with 25 µM AA at 28 °C, 200 rpm. The samples were subsequently collected at different time points to monitor prostaglandin production. Prior to the treatment, the basal concentration of PGE2 in shrimp ovary homogenates was 9.6 ng/g tissue. After 30 minutes of incubation with AA, the PGE2 concentration increased to 19.6 ng/g tissue and remained at this level before declining after 120 minutes of treatment (Figure 6A). Similarly, the concentration of PGF2α increased from the basal level of 10.9 ng/g tissue to 23.3 ng/g tissue after 60 minutes of incubation with AA and remained at the same level from 60 to 360 minutes after the treatment (Figure 6B). Together, these results suggest that the prostaglandin synthase activity is present in P. monodon ovary homogenates.
prostaglandin synthase activity assay using shrimp ovary homogenates. In vitro Shrimp ovary homogenates were incubated with 25 µM AA at 28 °C and collected at different time points (0, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 360 min). The homogenates were spun down and concentrations of PGE(A) and PGF(B) in the homogenate supernatant were estimated using EIA. The experiment was performed in triplicate and error bars indicate the standard deviation from the means. Asterisk indicates significant difference between the prostaglandin concentration at 0 h and the marked time point (<0.05). 2 2α P
Role of prostaglandin biosynthesis in shrimp ovarian development
The correlation between the amounts of prostaglandin and ovarian maturation in P. paeninsulanus [43], M. japonicus [10] and O. senex senex [20] led to the hypothesis that prostaglandins affect female reproductive development in crustaceans. To assess the possible role of prostaglandin biosynthesis in P. monodon ovarian maturation, we estimated the concentrations of PGE2 and PGF2α in different stages of shrimp ovaries. When compared with stage I ovaries, we observed that the PGE2 concentrations were lower in ovaries stage II and III and higher in ovaries stage IV (Figure 7A). On the other hand, the PGF2α concentrations were highest in stage I ovaries and steadily decreased as the ovaries matured (Figure 7B).
To correlate the mRNA expression levels of prostaglandin biosynthesis genes with different ovarian maturation stages, quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed on ovaries of 27 wild-caught broodstock from the Andaman Sea (Table 2). Four sets of primers for PmPGES1, PmPGES2, PmPGES3 and PmPGFS genes were used in this study (Table 3). To determine whether the gene was up- or down-regulated at a certain developmental stage, mRNA expression levels were compared with that of stage I ovaries, which was taken as a baseline. It was observed that all three PmPGES isoforms displayed different expression profiles during the development of ovaries. PmPGES1 was up-regulated 16-fold in stage II ovaries, then continued to decrease until it reached baseline in stage IV (Figure 8A). For PmPGES2, the change in expression from stage I to stage III ovaries was not significant. However, a significant 27-fold down-regulation of this transcript was observed in stage IV ovaries (Figure 8B). The PmPGES3 expression level did not change significantly throughout ovarian development (Figure 8C). Lastly, the amount of PmPGFS gene transcripts steadily decreased as the ovary maturation progressed from stage I to stage IV (Figure 8D).
PGEand PGFconcentrations in each ovary stage. 2 2α Shrimp ovaries from each stage were pooled together based on the GSI value (N = 3 for each ovary stage) and homogenized. The amounts of (A) PGEand (B) PGFwere determined using enzyme immunoassay. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from the means. These graphs are representatives of two independent experiments that yielded similar results. 2 2α
Relative expression levels ofandgenes in each ovary stage. PmPGES PmPGFS Wild broodstock from the Andaman Sea (N=27) were captured and dissected to obtain ovary samples used in the real-time PCR analysis. Each graph represents the average copy number of prostaglandin biosynthesis gene transcripts normalized againstin each ovary stage. (A), (B), (C)and (D). Error bars show standard deviations and asterisks indicate significant changes between stages (p < 0.05). EF1α PmPGES1 PmPGES2 PmPGES3 PmPGFS
| Ovary stages | N | Body Weight (g) | Body length (cm) | Ovary weight (g) | GSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 256.59±26.51 | 30.00±0.94 | 4.33±0.72 | 1.79±0.10 |
| 2 | 7 | 250.47±41.40 | 30.50±2.65 | 6.19±1.26 | 2.47±0.21 |
| 3 | 7 | 239.36±44.01 | 30.00±3.55 | 12.29±2.79 | 5.12±0.45 |
| 4 | 6 | 233.46±33.47 | 29.33±1.54 | 15.56±2.58 | 6.95±0.37 |
| Genes | Primers | Sequence |
|---|---|---|
| PGES1 | PGES1-RT-F | CAAGAAGGTATTCGCCAACC |
| PGES1-RT-R | CCGTTGCTCCTCAGGTACATA | |
| PGES2 | PGES2-RT-F | GGGAAGCATCCACCTGGACGTTCC |
| PGES2-RT-R | GGTGCCGTCTCTTCAGGTTCTTGCC | |
| PGES3 | PGES3-RT-F | GACTGCAAATCTCCCACCAT |
| PGES3-RT-R | ACTTTGAGCCAGTGCTGCTT | |
| PGFS | PGFS-RT-F | GGAGAAGTAATGCAGGCTGT |
| PGFS-RT-R | GCCAGGTCTCAATGTAATCC |
Discussion
In this study, the characterization of the P. monodon prostanoid pathway reveals that P. monodon contains the same types and number of prostaglandin synthase isoforms as those found in mammals (Fig, 1-4; Table 1). In addition to the three PmPGES isoforms shown in the Results section, P. monodon also encodes two isoforms of prostaglandin D synthase that matched the glutathione-dependent prostaglandin D synthase and hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase genes originally identified in mammals. Interestingly, the proposed prostanoid pathway in another crustacean Daphnia pulex contains only one isoform of each prostanoid biosynthesis gene [22], suggesting that the organization of the P. monodon prostanoid pathway is more conserved with those in mammals, or other divergent prostanoid biosynthetic genes are present in D. pulex that are not annotated. To compare if the P. monodon prostanoid protein sequence is more closely related to its homologs in D. pulex or mammals, phylogenetic analysis of PGES1 was performed, revealing that PmPGES1 is more closely related to its crustacean homologs, including D. pulex, than to its mammalian homologs (Figure S3).
PUFAs and PGE2 have previously been identified in domesticated P. monodon, although it was not clear whether these molecules were synthesized de novo as the animals had been fed with high-PUFA diets [13,21]. In this study, PGF2α was detected by RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry analysis in ovaries of wild-caught P. monodon, suggesting that these molecules occurred naturally in wild population consistent with de novo synthesis and were not the result of specific diets or rearing conditions. Although PmPGDS and PmTBXAS genes are present in P. monodon (Table 1), we were unable to detect the corresponding prostanoid products PGD2, PGF1α and TBX2 which have previously been identified in other arthropods [1,20,44,45]. Therefore, these prostanoids may be present in small amounts in P. monodon.
To provide further proof of a functioning prostanoid synthetic pathway, we assessed the prostaglandin synthase activity in penaeid shrimp using an in vitro activity assay to monitor PGE2 and PGF2α biosynthesis in P. monodon [46]. After shrimp ovary homogenates were incubated with AA, the PGE2 and PGF2α concentrations increased significantly when compared to the basal concentrations (Figure 6). In particular, the rise and fall of PGE2 concentrations observed in this study is similar to the study performed on A. americanum [47]. As the PGE2 biosynthesis activities have already been established in the Tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta [48], the blood sucking bug Triatoma infestans [49], the firebrat Thermobia domestica [50] and the cricket Teleogryllus commodus [51], we propose that the PGE2 biosynthesis is conserved among different arthropods.
Once the prostanoid pathway had been established in P. monodon, we examined whether there is a correlation between prostanoid biosynthesis and shrimp ovary development. In wild P. monodon broodstock, the concentrations of PGE2 decreased from stage I to stage III, but abruptly increased in stage IV ovaries (Figure 7A). This is inconsistent with the trend found in domesticated shrimp, in which the amounts of PGE2 gradually increased during ovary development [21]. The discrepancy between the two studies may be the result of different shrimp genetic background and/or dietary intake. Interestingly, the PGE2 concentrations were highest at stage IV ovaries in both wild and domesticated shrimp, but the significance of this observation has yet to be explored. When the gene expression of each PmPGES isoform was compared to the concentration of PGE2 found in each ovary stage, we observed no correlation between the two parameters. Furthermore, the lowest amount of PmPGES transcripts was found in stage IV ovaries, making it unlikely that the PGE2 biosynthesis is regulated at the transcriptional level in this organ.
Unlike PGE2, the amount of PGF2α steadily decreased with increasing ovary stages, which followed the same trend observed in M. japonicus [10]. Similarly, the PmPGFS gene expression also decreased as the ovaries matured, making PmPGFS gene expression and PGF2α concentration inversely correlated with shrimp ovarian development. Together, our findings suggest that lowered PGFS gene expression resulted in decreasing concentrations of PGF2α during shrimp ovarian maturation process. Therefore, we propose that the PGF2α biosynthesis may be involved in the P. monodon ovarian development.
In conclusion, a prostanoid pathway in P. monodon is proposed based on the identification of nine prostanoid biosynthesis genes, two prostaglandins and three prostanoid precursors (Figure 9). In addition, PGF2α biosynthesis may play an important role in P. monodon ovarian maturation because PGF2α concentration and PmPGFS gene expression declined as the ovarian development progressed. Collectively, our knowledge of the P. monodon prostanoid pathway may lead to future applications in the black tiger shrimp aquaculture industry. More importantly, the identification of the P. monodon prostanoid biosynthesis genes also suggests the conservation of the prostanoid pathway between marine crustaceans and mammals.
The proposed prostanoid biosynthesis pathway in. P. monodon PUFAs, prostaglandins and full-length prostanoid biosynthesis genes identified in this study (black) were used to outline theprostanoid pathway based on the previously published pathway in mammals. Prostanoids that have yet to be identified inare shown in gray. P. monodon P. monodon
Materials and Methods
Collection of shrimp samples
Wild female P. monodon broodstock (n = 25) were collected from the Andaman Sea, Thailand. The weight and length of broodstock were measured and recorded prior to dissection. Shrimp ovaries were dissected, weighed and either subjected to metabolite extraction or flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C for RNA extraction. The gonadosomatic index (GSI) of each shrimp was calculated using the following equation: ovarian weight/body weight x 100. Ovarian developmental stages were assigned according to GSI, separating the broodstock into stage I (GSI < 1.5), stage II (GSI = 2-4), stage III (GSI > 4-6) and stage IV (GSI > 6) [21].
Extraction of prostaglandins from shrimp tissues
Tissue homogenates underwent extraction twice with an equal volume of ethyl acetate. The solvent phases were then pooled together and dried under vacuum. Afterward, the dried crude extract was dissolved in 5% methanol. The solution was filtered to remove insoluble material before being loaded onto a 6-ml C18 SPE cartridge (VertiPakTM, Vertical Chromatography, Co., Ltd., Thailand), which was previously washed with 10 ml methanol and 10 ml water. Columns were then washed with 10 ml water, 4 ml hexane, and again with 10 ml water, before being eluted with 10 ml ethyl acetate. The eluate was then evaporated and dissolved in ethanol for subsequent HPLC analysis.
Identification of PUFAs and prostaglandins by RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry
Shrimp tissue extracts were separated by RP-HPLC using an Acclaim® 120 C18 column (3 µm, 4.6 mm x 150 mm; DIONEX Ltd., Surrey, UK) and a gradient mobile system consisting of acetonitrile (ACN): water: acetic acid (30:70:0.01) to 100% ACN in 35 min, with the flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. Resulting peaks were detected using the DIONEX Ultimate 3000 diode-array detector (DIONEX Ltd.). For RP-HPLC/MS analysis, samples were analyzed using the Agilent 1200 series LC system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with the micrOTOF mass spectrometer and operated with HyStar version 3.2 (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Billerica, MA, USA).
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Shrimp organs were homogenized and subjected to total RNA extraction using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, California, USA). mRNA was purified from total RNA using the Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Maryland, USA). First strand cDNA was synthesized using the RevertAidTM First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with oligo (dT)18 primer (Fermentas, Maryland, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Gene amplification
Initial PCR fragments were obtained using primers based on short gene sequences from The Black Tiger Shrimp EST Project at http://pmonodon.biotec.or.th↗ [26] and the Marine Genomics Project at http://www.marinegenomics.org↗ [24]. 5′- and 3′-RACE-PCR were performed using the AdvantageTM 2 PCR kit (Clontech, California, USA) and the SmartTM RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech). All PCR products were cloned into the pTZ57R/T vector (Fermentas), transformed into DH5α E. coli, and submitted for DNA sequencing (1st-BASE, Malaysia). Identities of the obtained cDNA sequences were verified by TBLASTX analysis [52]. Multiple sequence alignment of prostaglandin biosynthesis genes were performed using CLUSTALX [53]. Rooted phylogenetic tree with branch length were performed using CLUSTALW [53]. Protein domains were predicted using Conserved Domain Architecture Retrieval Tool (CDART - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/lexington/lexington.cgi) [54].
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed using the SsoFastTM EvaGreen® Supermix (Bio-Rad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amounts of prostanoid biosynthesis gene transcripts relative to that of the house-keeping gene elongation factor 1α (EF1α) were obtained using the standard curve method [55]. The specificity of the PCR product was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and melting curve analysis performed from 55 °C to 95 °C with a continuous fluorescent reading at 0.5 °C increments.
Identification of shrimp PGEand PGFby enzyme immunoassay (EIA) 2 2α
Stage IV shrimp ovaries were harvested and homogenized in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with an osmolarity of 720 mmol/kg (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Missouri, USA). For the in vitro PGE2 synthesis assay, ovary homogenates were incubated in a rotary shaker with 25 µM AA at 28 °C, 200 rpm and collected at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes post-incubation. The homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 2 min at 4 °C and the amounts of PGE2 and PGF2α in the supernatant were estimated using the prostaglandin E2 EIA kit – Monoclonal and prostaglandin F2α EIA kit (Cayman Chemical, Michigan, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical significant was assessed in this study using the T-test with two samples assuming equal variances (P<0.05).
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We would like to give our thanks to Dr. Sirawut Klinbunga for his valuable suggestion at the beginning of this project, Dr. Rungnapa Leelatanawit for her expertise in shrimp dissection, and Dr. Philip Shaw for his constructive comments on the manuscript.
Funding Statement
This work has been supported by the National Science and Technology Development Agency (Grant number BT-02-SG-BC-5105 and BT-02-SG-BO-5203). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.