Solid, Gel, and Liquid Carbohydrate Format Effects on Gut Comfort and Performance

Dec 21, 2016International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism

How Solid, Gel, and Liquid Carbohydrates Affect Digestion Comfort and Physical Performance

AI simplified

Circadian Biology on OpenScience ↗PubMed ↗DOI ↗

Abstract

Carbohydrate bars may reduce peak power by 3.9% compared to gels during intense cycling performance.

Well-trained male cyclists consumed carbohydrate in the form of drinks, gels, bars, or a mix during a 140-minute race simulation.
Performance peak power measurements showed variations among the different carbohydrate formats, with drinks and gels performing similarly.
Ingestion of carbohydrate bars was associated with small to moderate increases in nausea, stomach fullness, and abdominal cramps compared to gels and drinks.
The likelihood of experiencing harm from bars was significantly higher than from gels and drinks.
Overall, carbohydrate bars appeared to be a less favorable energy source for intense endurance performance compared to gels.

AI simplified

Carbohydrate sports drinks produce worthwhile benefits to endurance performance compared with noncaloric controls. However, athletes now consume carbohydrate in a range of formats, including gels and bars, but the comparable performance outcomes are unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish the relative effects of drink, gel, bar, and mixed carbohydrate formats on intense cycling performance. In a treatmentapparent randomized crossover design, 12 well-trained male cyclists completed 4 trials comprising a 140-min race simulation, followed by a double-blind slow-ramp to exhaustion (0.333 W·s). Carbohydrate comprising fructose and maltodextrin was ingested every 20 min via commercial drink, gel, bar, or mix of all 3, providing 80 g carbohydrate·h. Fluid ingestion was 705 ml·h. Exertion, fatigue, and gastrointestinal discomfort were measured with VAS. Performance peak power (SD) was 370 (41), 376 (37), 362 (51) and 368 W (54) for drink, gels, bars, and mix respectively. The reduction in power (-3.9%; 90%CI ±4.3) following bar ingestion vs. gel was likely substantial (likelihood harm 81.2%; benefit 0.8%), but no clear differences between drinks, gels, and the mix were evident. Bars also produced small-moderate standardized increases in nausea, stomach fullness, abdominal cramps, and perceived exertion, relative to gels (likelihood harm 95-99.5%; benefit <0.01%) and drink (75-95%; <0.01%); mix also increased nausea relative to gels (95%; <0.01%). Relative to a gel, carbohydrate bar ingestion reduced peak power, gut comfort, and ease of exertion; furthermore, no clear difference relative to drink suggests bars alone are the less favorable exogenous-carbohydrate energy source for intense endurance performance. -1 -1 -1

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

View full text (HTML) ↗View full text ↗

Solid, Gel, and Liquid Carbohydrate Format Effects on Gut Comfort and Performance

Abstract

Full Text

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief

Abstract

Full Text

Related papers

You found one interesting study. We’ll send the next 7.

what lands in your inbox each week:

Recent issues from the circadian biology brief