Validity of chronotype questionnaires in adolescents: Correlations with actigraphy

Mar 5, 2022Journal of sleep research

How well sleep timing questionnaires match sleep tracking in teenagers

AI simplified

Abstract

Fifty-five adolescents aged 13 to 16 completed three chronotype questionnaires alongside a 7-day actigraphy assessment.

  • All three chronotype questionnaires demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity.
  • Morning-oriented participants reported less daytime sleepiness and had earlier sleep times compared to evening-oriented participants.
  • Chronotype classification varied significantly between the questionnaires, with the Composite Scale of Morningness identifying more morning types than the reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents.
  • Age and sex did not significantly affect questionnaire scores.
  • The three questionnaires are valid tools for assessing circadian preference in adolescents, but their classification results are not interchangeable.

AI simplified

Full Text

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free