Examining the Agreement Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Sleep: A Comparison of Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and Fitbit‐Derived Sleep Metrics

Apr 10, 2025Journal of sleep research

Comparing Self-Reported Sleep Patterns with Fitbit Sleep Data Using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire

AI simplified

Abstract

Correlations between subjective sleep measures and Fitbit metrics ranged from 0.12 to 0.42 across different sleep metrics.

  • Fitbit classified 63.2% of participants as having insufficient sleep, while only 39.45% were identified as such by the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ).
  • Weak to moderate correlations were found for sleep duration (r = 0.15-0.21), sleep midpoint (r = 0.37-0.42), and social jetlag (r = 0.12-0.16).
  • Quadratic and LOESS models revealed nonlinear trends for sleep midpoint, with greater divergence between Fitbit and MCTQ at extreme morningness or eveningness.
  • Higher body mass index (BMI) was significantly linked to shorter sleep duration and greater variability in sleep metrics.
  • Household income and BMI moderated specific sleep measures, while age and sex did not show significant moderation.

AI simplified

Full Text

Full text is available at the source.

what lands in your inbox each week:

  • 📚7 fresh studies
  • 📝plain-language summaries
  • direct links to original studies
  • 🏅top journal indicators
  • 📅weekly delivery
  • 🧘‍♂️always free