Postgraduate medicine···
Expert Guidelines for Treating Urgent Behavioral Crises
Updated
Abstract
Consensus was reached on 83% of the options regarding management strategies for behavioral emergencies.
- 47% of experts indicated that emergency interventions were necessary for 1%-5% of patients, while 32% reported a need for such interventions in 6%-20% of cases.
- Control of aggressive behavior was identified as the highest priority during emergencies, with maintaining the physician-patient relationship rated second for long-term care.
- Oral medications, particularly concentrates, were preferred when feasible, with benzodiazepines rated highest in 6 of 12 scenarios.
- High-potency conventional antipsychotics received lower ratings than benzodiazepines when used alone, while a combination of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics was favored for specific conditions.
- Droperidol was noted as a preferred option in certain situations requiring injection.
Simplified
OBJECTIVES: Behavioral emergencies are a common and serious problem for consumers, their communities, and the healthcare settings on which they rely to contain, assess, and ultimately help the individual in a behavioral crisis. Partly because of the inherent dangers of this situation, there is little research to guide provider responses to this challenge. Key constructs such as agitation have not been adequately operationalized so that the criteria defining a behavioral emergency are vague. The significant progress that has been made for some disease states with better treatments and higher consumer acceptance has not penetrated this area of practice. A significant number of deaths of patients in restraint has focused government and regulators on these issues, but a consensus about key elements in the management of behavioral emergencies has not yet been articulated by the provider community. The authors assembled a panel of 50 experts to define the following elements: the threshold for emergency interventions, the scope of assessment for varying levels of urgency and cooperation, guiding principles in selecting interventions, and appropriate physical and medication strategies at different levels of diagnostic confidence and for a variety of etiologies and complicating conditions.
METHOD: In order to identify issues in this area on which there is consensus, a written survey with 808 decision points was developed. The survey was mailed to a panel of 52 experts, 50 of whom completed it. A modified version of the RAND Corporation 9-point scale for rating appropriateness of medical decisions was used to score options. Consensus on each option was defined as a non-random distribution of scores by chi-square "goodness-of-fit" test. We assigned a categorical rank (first line/preferred choice, second line/alternate choice, third line/usually inappropriate) to each option based on the 95% confidence interval around the mean rating. Guideline tables were constructed describing the preferred strategies in key clinical situations.
RESULTS: The expert panel reached consensus on 83% of the options. The relative appropriateness of emergency interventions was ascertained for a continuum of behaviors. When asked about the frequency with which emergency interventions (parenteral medication, restraints, seclusion) were required in their services, 47% of the experts reported that such interventions were necessary for 1%-5% of patients seen in their services and 32% for 6%-20%. In general, the consensus of this panel lends support to many elements of recent Health Care Financing Administration regulations, including the timing of clinician assessment and reassessment and the intensity of nursing care. However, the panel did not endorse the concept of "chemical restraint," instead favoring the idea that medications are treatments for target behaviors in behavioral emergencies even when the causes of these behaviors are not well understood. Control of aggressive behavior emerged as the highest priority during the emergency; however, preserving the physician-patient relationship was rated a close second and became the top priority in the long term. Oral medications, particularly concentrates, were clearly preferred if it is possible to use them. Benzodiazepines alone were top rated in 6 of 12 situations. High-potency conventional antipsychotics used alone never received higher ratings than benzodiazepines used alone. A combination of a benzodiazepine and an antipsychotic was preferred for patients with suspected schizophrenia, mania, or psychotic depression. There was equal support for high-potency conventional or atypical antipsychotics (particularly liquids) in oral combinations with benzodiazepines. Droperidol emerged in fourth place in some situations requiring an injection.
CONCLUSIONS: To evaluate many of the treatment options in this survey, the experts had to extrapolate beyond controlled data in comparing modalities with each other or in combination. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the expectation that future research data will take precedence, these guidelines provide some direction for addressing common clinical dilemmas in the management of psychiatric emergencies and can be used to inform clinicians in acute care settings regarding the relative merits of various strategies.
Related papers
Jun '05
Expert guidelines for treating sudden behavioral crises
cited by 65 papers
journal article
Dec '03
Guidelines for Improving Medication Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: Introduction, Methods, and Summary
cited by 112 papers
practice guideline
Mar '04
Use of Antipsychotic Medicines in Older Adults
cited by 108 papers
consensus statement
Jan '07
Guidelines for Treating Dementia and Its Behavioral Symptoms: Introduction, Methods, and Overview
top 30% journal
cited by 40 papers
research support, non-u.s. gov't
Jul '00
Expert guidelines for medication treatment of bipolar disorder (2000)
top 30% journal
cited by 87 papers
guideline
Dec '05
Expert Guidelines for Treating Urgent Behavioral Crises (2005)
cited by 172 papers
practice guideline
Jan '07
Medication Treatment Guidelines for Depression in Older Adults
top 30% journal
cited by 47 papers
practice guideline
Dec '07
Expert advice on treating epilepsy in children in Europe, 2007
top 30% journal
cited by 205 papers
research support, non-u.s. gov't
Aug '01
Guidelines for Treating Depression in Women
top 30% journal
cited by 31 papers
guideline
Jul '05
Expert guidelines for treating depression in women
cited by 42 papers
journal article